e10vk
Table of Contents

 
2009 10-K
 
U. S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010
 
Commission file number 1-7685
 
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Delaware
  95-1492269
(State of incorporation)
  (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
150 North Orange Grove Boulevard
Pasadena, California
 
91103
(Address of principal executive offices)
  (Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(626) 304-2000
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
     
Title of Each Class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
 
Common stock, $1 par value   New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Share Purchase Rights   New York Stock Exchange
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Not applicable.
 
Indicate by a check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by a check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No o
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the act).  Yes o     No þ
 
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates as of July 4, 2009, was $2,416,413,926.
 
Number of shares of common stock, $1 par value, outstanding as of January 30, 2010: 112,058,162.
 
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the Parts of this report below indicated:
 
     
Document
  Incorporated by reference into:
 
Portions of Annual Report to Shareholders for fiscal year ended January 2, 2010 (the “2009 Annual Report”)
  Parts I, II
Portions of Definitive Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 22, 2010 (the “2010 Proxy Statement”)
  Parts III, IV
 


 

 
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
 
FISCAL YEAR 2009 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
                 
        Page
 
      Business     1  
      Risk Factors     5  
      Unresolved Staff Comments     11  
      Properties     12  
      Legal Proceedings     12  
      Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     14  
        List of Executive Officers     15  
 
PART II
      Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities     16  
      Selected Financial Data     16  
      Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition     16  
      Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     16  
      Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     16  
      Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     16  
      Controls and Procedures     16  
      Other Information     17  
 
PART III
      Directors, Executive Officers of the Registrant and Corporate Governance     18  
      Executive Compensation     18  
      Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters     18  
      Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence     18  
      Principal Accounting Fees and Services     18  
 
PART IV
      Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules     19  
            20  
 EX-12
 EX-13
 EX-21
 EX-24
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2


Table of Contents

 
PART I
 
Item 1.   BUSINESS
 
Company Background
 
Avery Dennison Corporation (“Avery Dennison,” the “Company,” “Registrant,” “Issuer,” which may be referred to as “we” or “us”) was incorporated in 1977 in the state of Delaware as Avery International Corporation, the successor corporation to a California corporation of the same name, which was incorporated in 1946. In 1990, the Company merged one of its subsidiaries into Dennison Manufacturing Company (“Dennison”), as a result of which Dennison became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and in connection with which the Company’s name was changed to Avery Dennison Corporation. Our homepage on the internet is www.averydennison.com and you can learn more about us by visiting our Web site. Our Web site address provided in this annual report on Form 10-K is not intended to function as a hyperlink and the information on our Web site is not and should not be considered part of this report and is not incorporated by reference in this document.
 
Business Overview and Reporting Segments
 
Our businesses include the production of pressure-sensitive materials, office products and a variety of tickets, tags, labels and other converted products. Some pressure-sensitive materials are sold to label printers and converters that “convert” the materials into labels and other products through embossing, printing, stamping and die-cutting. Some are sold by us in converted form as printable media, tapes and reflective sheeting. We also manufacture and sell a variety of office products and other converted products and other items not involving pressure-sensitive components, such as binders, organizing systems, markers, fasteners, business forms, as well as tickets, tags, radio-frequency identification (“RFID”) inlays and labels, and imprinting equipment for retail and apparel manufacturers.
 
A pressure-sensitive, or self-adhesive, material is one that adheres to a surface by press-on contact. It generally consists of four elements: a face material, which may be paper, metal foil, plastic film or fabric; an adhesive, which may be permanent or removable; a release coating; and a backing material to protect the adhesive against premature contact with other surfaces, and which can also serve as the carrier for supporting and dispensing individual labels. When the products are to be used, the release coating and protective backing are removed, exposing the adhesive, and the label or other face material is pressed or rolled into place.
 
Because self-adhesive materials are easy to apply without the need for adhesive activation, the use of self-adhesive materials often provides cost savings compared with other materials that require heat- or moisture-activated adhesives. When used in package decoration applications, the visual appeal of self-adhesive materials often helps foster increased sales of the product on which the materials are applied. Self-adhesive materials provide consistent and versatile adhesion and are available in a large selection of materials in nearly any size, shape and color.
 
We are subject to certain risks referred to in “Risk Factors” (Part I, Item 1A) and “Legal Proceedings” (Part I, Item 3) below, including those normally attending international and domestic operations, such as changes in economic or political conditions, currency fluctuations, exchange control regulations and the effect of international relations and domestic affairs of foreign countries on the conduct of business, legal proceedings, and the availability and pricing of raw materials.
 
No single customer represented 10% or more of our net sales or trade receivables at year end 2009 and 2008. However, our ten largest customers at year end 2009 represented approximately 13% of trade accounts receivable and consisted of six customers of our Office and Consumer Products segment and four customers of our Pressure-sensitive Materials segment. The financial position and operations of these customers are monitored on an ongoing basis (see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” of Part I, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition”). United States export sales are not a significant part of our business. Backlogs are not considered material in the industries in which we compete.


1


Table of Contents

Our reporting segments are:
 
  •  Pressure-sensitive Materials
 
  •  Retail Information Services
 
  •  Office and Consumer Products
 
In addition to our reporting segments, we have other specialty converting businesses comprised of several businesses that produce specialty tapes and highly engineered labels including RFID inlays and labels, and other converted products.
 
In 2007, we completed the acquisition of Paxar Corporation (“Paxar”), a global leader in retail tag, ticketing, and branding systems. In 2008, we completed the acquisition of DM Label Group (“DM Label”), a manufacturer of labels, tags and tickets for retail and apparel applications, including woven labels. These operations are included in the Company’s Retail Information Services segment. See Retail Information Services Segment below for further information.
 
In 2009, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment contributed approximately 56% of our total sales, while the Retail Information Services and Office and Consumer Products segments contributed approximately 22% and 14%, respectively, of our total sales.
 
In 2009, international operations constituted a significant portion of our business and represented approximately 66% of our sales. We expanded our operations, focusing particularly on Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe. As of January 2, 2010, we operated approximately 200 manufacturing and distribution facilities and employed approximately 32,000 persons in over 60 countries, worldwide.
 
Pressure-sensitive Materials Segment
 
The Pressure-sensitive Materials segment manufactures and sells Fasson-, JAC-, and Avery Dennison-brand pressure-sensitive materials, Avery-brand graphics and graphic films, Avery Dennison-brand reflective products, and performance polymers. The business of this segment is generally not seasonal, except for certain outdoor graphics and reflective products and operations in Western Europe. Pressure-sensitive materials consist primarily of papers, plastic films, metal foils and fabrics, which are coated with Company-developed and purchased adhesives, and then laminated with specially coated backing papers and films. They are sold in roll or sheet form with either solid or patterned adhesive coatings, and are available in a wide range of face materials, sizes, thicknesses and adhesive properties. These materials are sold to label printers and converters for labeling, decorating, fastening, electronic data processing and special applications on a worldwide basis.
 
Graphic products consist of a variety of films and other products sold to the architectural, commercial sign, digital printing, and other related markets. We also sell durable cast and reflective films to the construction, automotive, and fleet transportation markets, scrim-reinforced vinyl material for banner sign applications, and reflective films for traffic and safety applications. Our graphic and reflective businesses are organized on a worldwide basis to serve the expanding commercial graphic arts market, including wide-format digital printing applications. We also manufacture and sell proprietary films that are used for outdoor, weather-resistant applications.
 
Performance polymer products include a range of solvent- and emulsion-based acrylic polymer adhesives, protective coatings and other polymer additives for internal use, as well as for sale to other companies.
 
In this segment, our larger competitors are Raflatac, a subsidiary of UPM-Kymmene; Morgan Adhesives (“MACtac”), a division of the Bemis Company; and 3M Company (for graphic and reflective products). Entry of competitors into the field of pressure-sensitive adhesives and materials may be limited by capital requirements and a need for technical knowledge. We believe that our relative size and scale of operations, our ability to serve our customers with a broad line of quality products and service programs, our distribution and brand strength, and the development and commercialization of new products are among the more significant factors in developing and maintaining our competitive position.


2


Table of Contents

Retail Information Services Segment
 
The Retail Information Services segment designs, manufactures and sells a wide variety of price marking and brand identification products for retailers, apparel manufacturers, distributors and industrial customers on a worldwide basis. The business of this segment is seasonal, with higher volume generally in advance of the fall (back-to-school), spring, and holiday shipping periods.
 
Our brand identification products include woven and printed labels, graphic tags and barcode tags. Our information management products include price tickets, carton labels, RFID tags and printing applications. Services include supply chain and security management, and retail store efficiency. Our solution enabling products include barcode printers, molded plastic fastening and application devices, and security management products.
 
As discussed above, we completed the acquisitions of Paxar and DM Label in 2007 and 2008, respectively. The combination of these businesses into this segment increases our presence in the retail information and brand identification market, broadens the range of our product and service capabilities, and improves our ability to meet customer demands for product innovation. The integration of these acquisitions into our operations has resulted in significant cost synergies.
 
In this segment, some of our competitors are SML Group, Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and Shore to Shore, Inc. We believe that our ability to serve our customers with product innovation, a comprehensive brand identification and information management product line, our global distribution network, service, quality, and geographic reach are the key advantages in developing and maintaining our competitive position.
 
Office and Consumer Products Segment
 
The Office and Consumer Products segment manufactures and sells a wide range of Avery-brand printable media and other products. The business of this segment is seasonal, with higher volume related to the back-to-school season.
 
This segment’s products are generally sold through office products superstores, mass market distributors, wholesalers and dealers. We manufacture and sell a wide range of Avery-brand products for office, school and home uses: printable media, such as copier, ink-jet and laser printer labels, related computer software, ink-jet and laser printer card and index products; and organization, filing and presentation products, such as binders, dividers and sheet protectors. We also offer a wide range of other stationery products, including writing instruments, markers, adhesives and specialty products under brand names such as Avery, Marks-A-Lot and HI-LITER. The extent of product offerings varies by geographic market.
 
In this segment, our larger competitors are Acco Brands Corporation, Esselte Corporation and manufacturers of private brands. We believe that our brand strength, a large installed base of software that facilitates the use of many of our products, our ability to serve our customers with a broad line of quality products, and the development and commercialization of new products are among the more significant factors in developing and maintaining our competitive position.
 
Other specialty converting businesses
 
Other specialty converting businesses include our specialty tape, industrial, performance films and automotive products, business media, RFID and security printing businesses. These businesses manufacture and sell specialty tapes, highly engineered films, RFID inlays, pressure-sensitive postage stamps and other converted products. These businesses are generally not seasonal, except for certain automotive products due to plant shutdowns by automotive manufacturers.
 
The specialty tape business manufactures and sells single- and double-coated tapes and adhesive transfer tapes for use in non-mechanical fastening, bonding and sealing systems in various industries, which are sold to industrial and medical original equipment manufacturers, converters, and disposable diaper producers worldwide. These products are sold in roll form and are available in a wide range of face materials, sizes, thicknesses and adhesive properties.


3


Table of Contents

Our industrial and automotive products businesses primarily consist of custom pressure-sensitive and heat-seal labels for the automotive and durable goods industries. These products are sold primarily to original equipment manufacturers.
 
Our performance films business produces a variety of decorative and functional films, primarily for the automotive industry, that are designed for injection mold applications.
 
Our business media business designs and markets customized products for printing and information workflow applications.
 
Our RFID business manufactures RFID inlays and labels and makes use of our existing distribution by marketing to our label converting customers.
 
Our security printing business manufactures and sells self-adhesive battery labels to a battery manufacturer, and self-adhesive stamps to the U.S. Postal Service.
 
In addition, we sell specialty print-receptive films to the industrial label market, metallic dispersion products to the packaging industry, and proprietary wood grain and other patterns of film laminates for housing exteriors, and interior and exterior automotive applications.
 
We compete with a number of diverse businesses. Our largest competitor for this group of businesses is 3M Company in the specialty tape business. Entry of competitors into these specialty converting businesses may be limited by capital and technical requirements. We believe that our ability to serve our customers with quality, cost effective products and the development and commercialization of new products are among the more significant factors in developing and maintaining our competitive position.
 
Financial Information about Segments
 
Certain financial information on our reporting segments and other specialty converting businesses for the three years ended January 2, 2010, which appear in Note 12, “Segment Information,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, are incorporated herein by reference.
 
Foreign Operations
 
Certain financial information about our geographic areas for the three years ended January 2, 2010, which appear in Note 12, “Segment Information,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, are incorporated herein by reference.
 
Research and Development
 
Many of our current products are the result of our research and development efforts. Our expenses for research, design and testing of new products and applications by our operating units and the Avery Research Center (the “Research Center”) located in Pasadena, California were $90.7 million in 2009, $94 million in 2008, and $95.5 million in 2007. A significant number of our research and development activities are conducted at the Research Center, which supports each of our operating segments.
 
Our operating units’ research efforts are directed primarily toward developing new products and operating techniques and improving product performance, often in close association with customers. The Research Center supports our operating units’ patent and product development work, and focuses on improving adhesives, materials and coating processes, as well as related product applications and ventures. These efforts often focus on projects relating to printing and coating technologies, as well as adhesive, release and ink chemistries.
 
Patents, Trademarks and Licenses
 
The loss of individual patents or licenses would not be material to us taken as a whole, nor to our operating segments individually. Our principal trademarks are Avery, Fasson, Avery Dennison and the Company’s symbol. These trademarks are significant in the markets in which our products compete.


4


Table of Contents

Other Matters
 
We use various raw materials, primarily paper, plastic films and resins, as well as specialty chemicals purchased from various commercial and industrial sources, which are subject to price fluctuations. Although shortages could occur from time to time, these raw materials are generally available.
 
We produce a majority of our self-adhesive materials using water-based emulsion and hot-melt adhesive technologies. Emissions from these operations contain small amounts of volatile organic compounds, which can be regulated by agencies of federal, state, local and foreign governments. We continue to evaluate the use of alternative materials and technologies to minimize these emissions.
 
A portion of our manufacturing process for self-adhesive materials utilizes certain organic solvents which, unless controlled, would be emitted into the atmosphere. Emissions of these substances are regulated by agencies of federal, state, local and foreign governments. In connection with the maintenance and acquisition of certain manufacturing equipment, we invest in solvent capture and control units to assist in regulating these emissions.
 
We have developed adhesives and adhesive processing systems that minimize the use of solvents. Emulsion adhesives, hot-melt adhesives or solventless silicone systems have been installed in our facilities in Peachtree City, Georgia; Fort Wayne and Greenfield, Indiana; Painesville, Ohio; and Quakertown, Pennsylvania; as well as in other plants in the United States, Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, China, Colombia, France, Germany, India, Korea, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Thailand and the United Kingdom.
 
Based on current information, we do not believe that the cost of complying with applicable laws regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, will have a material effect upon our capital expenditures, consolidated financial position or results of operations.
 
For information regarding our potential responsibility for cleanup costs at certain hazardous waste sites, see “Legal Proceedings” (Part I, Item 3) and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition” (Part II, Item 7).
 
Available Information
 
Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge by way of a third-party hyperlink service through our Web site, www.averydennison.com (in the “Investors” section), as soon as reasonably practical after electronic filing with or furnishing of such material to the SEC. We make available at the Web site our (i) Corporate Governance Guidelines, (ii) Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which applies to our directors and employees, (iii) Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, (iv) the charters of the Audit, Compensation and Executive Personnel, and Nominating and Governance Committees of our Board of Directors, and (v) Audit Committee Complaint Handling Procedures. These materials are also available free of charge in print to stockholders who request them by writing to: Secretary, Avery Dennison Corporation, 150 North Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91103.
 
Item 1A.   RISK FACTORS
 
Our ability to attain our goals and objectives is materially dependent on numerous factors and risks, including but not limited to, the following:
 
Adverse conditions in the global economy have negatively impacted our customers, suppliers and our business.
 
The United States, Europe and Asia have experienced significant declines in economic activity, including, among other things, reduced consumer spending, inflation, declines in asset valuations, diminished liquidity and credit availability, significant volatility in securities prices, rating downgrades, and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. These economic developments have adversely affected our customers, suppliers and businesses similar to ours and have resulted in a variety of negative effects, such as reduction in revenues, increased costs, lower gross margin percentages, increased allowances for doubtful accounts and/or write-offs of accounts


5


Table of Contents

receivable, required recognition of impairments of capitalized assets, including goodwill and other intangibles, and such developments could have other material adverse effects on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. We are not able to predict the duration and severity of adverse economic conditions in the U.S. and other countries, and there can be no assurance that there will not be further declines in economic activity.
 
The demand for our products is impacted by the effects of, and changes in, worldwide conditions, which could have an adverse effect on our sales and profitability.
 
We have operations in over 60 countries and our domestic and international operations are strongly influenced by matters beyond our control, including changes in political, social, economic and labor conditions, tax laws (including U.S. taxes on foreign subsidiaries), and international trade regulations (including tariffs), as well as the impact of these changes on the underlying demand for our products.
 
We are affected by competitive conditions and customer preferences. If we do not compete effectively, we could lose market share and experience falling prices, adversely affecting our financial results.
 
We are at risk that our competitors will expand in our key markets and implement new technologies making them more competitive. Competitors also may be able to offer additional products, services, lower prices, or other incentives that we cannot or will not offer or that will make our products less profitable. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors.
 
We also are at risk with regard to changes in customer order patterns, such as changes in the levels of inventory maintained by customers and the timing of customer purchases, which may be affected by announced price changes, changes in the Company’s incentive programs, or changes in the customer’s ability to achieve incentive goals. Changes in customers’ preferences for our products can also affect the demand for our products. Our business could be negatively impacted by a decline in demand for our products.
 
As a manufacturer, our sales and profitability are dependent upon the cost and availability of raw materials and energy, which are subject to price fluctuations, and our ability to control or pass on costs of raw materials and labor.
 
Inflationary and other increases in the costs of raw materials, labor and energy have occurred in the past and are expected to recur, and our performance depends in part on our ability to pass on these cost increases to customers through our selling prices for products and to effect improvements in productivity. Also, it is important for us to obtain timely delivery of materials, equipment, and other resources from suppliers, and to make timely delivery to customers. A disruption to our supply chain could adversely affect our sales and profitability.
 
Foreign currency exchange rates, and fluctuations in those rates, may affect our sales and profitability.
 
Approximately 66% of our sales are from international operations. Fluctuations in currencies can cause transaction, translation and other losses to us, which can negatively impact our sales and profitability. Margins on sales of our products in foreign countries could be materially and adversely affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
 
We monitor our foreign currency exposures and may, from time to time, use hedging instruments to mitigate exposure to changes in foreign currencies. Hedging activities may only offset a portion of the adverse financial effects of unfavorable movements in foreign exchange rates over the limited time the hedges are in place.
 
Our future results may be affected if we generate less productivity improvement than projected.
 
We intend to continue efforts to reduce costs in many of our operations through facility closures, headcount reductions, organizational restructuring, process standardization, and manufacturing relocation, by using a variety of tools, such as Lean Sigma and Kaizen events, to increase productivity. However, the success of these efforts is not assured and lower levels of productivity could reduce profitability. In addition, cost reduction actions could expose us to additional production risk and loss of sales.


6


Table of Contents

We have acquired companies and may continue to acquire other companies. Acquisitions come with significant risks and uncertainties, including those related to integration, technology and personnel.
 
To grow our product lines and expand into new markets, we have made acquisitions and may do so in the future. For example, we acquired DM Label and Paxar in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Various risks, uncertainties, and costs are associated with the acquisitions. Effective integration of systems, controls, objectives, personnel, product lines, markets, customers, suppliers, and production facilities and cost savings can be difficult to achieve, and the results of integration actions are uncertain, particularly given our geographically dispersed organization. In addition, we may not be able to retain key personnel of an acquired company and we may not be able to successfully execute integration strategies or achieve projected performance targets for the business segment into which an acquired company is integrated. Both prior to and after the closing of a transaction, our business and those of the acquired company or companies may suffer due to uncertainty or diversion of management attention.
 
There can be no assurance that any acquisitions will be successful and contribute to our profitability and we may not be able to identify new acquisition opportunities in the future.
 
Declines or slower growth in key markets could adversely affect our profitability.
 
Our business could be negatively impacted by declines or slower growth in key end-use markets. Our overall performance will be influenced by these markets.
 
Our customer base is diversified, but in certain portions of our business, industry concentration has increased the importance, and decreased the number of, significant customers.
 
Sales of our office and consumer products in the United States are concentrated in a few major customers, principally office product superstores, mass market distributors and wholesalers. The business risk associated with this concentration, including increased credit risks for these and other customers, and the possibility of related bad debt write-offs, could negatively affect our margins and profits.
 
Possible increased difficulty in the collection of receivables as a result of economic conditions or other market factors could have a material effect on our results from operations and anticipated cash from operating activities.
 
Although we have processes to administer credit granted to customers and believe our allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate, we have experienced, and in the future may experience, losses as a result of our inability to collect our accounts receivable. The financial difficulties of a customer could result in reduced business with that customer. We may also assume higher credit risk relating to receivables of a customer experiencing financial difficulty. If these developments occur, our inability to shift sales to other customers or to collect on our trade accounts receivable from major customers could substantially reduce our income and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows from operating activities.
 
Our ability to develop and successfully market new products and applications is important for our business.
 
The timely introduction of new products and improvements in current products helps determine our success. Research and development for each of our operating segments is complex and uncertain and requires innovation and anticipation of market trends. We could focus on products that ultimately are not accepted by customers or we could suffer delays in production or launch of new products that could compromise our competitive position in such product markets.
 
For us to remain competitive, it is important to recruit and retain highly-skilled employees. We also utilize various outsourcing arrangements for certain services.
 
There is significant competition to recruit and retain skilled employees. Due to expansion in certain markets and the ongoing productivity efforts and recent employee reductions, it may be difficult for us to recruit and retain sufficient numbers of highly-skilled employees.


7


Table of Contents

We have outsourced certain services to multiple third-party service providers, and may outsource other services in the future to achieve cost savings and efficiencies. Service provider delays, resource availability, business issues or errors may lead to disruption in our businesses and/or increased costs. If we do not effectively develop, implement and manage outsourcing strategies, if third-party providers do not perform effectively and in a timely manner, or if we experience problems with a transition, we may not be able to achieve our expected cost savings, and may have to experience delays or incur additional costs to correct errors made by such service providers.
 
Significant disruption to our information technology infrastructure could adversely impact our operations, sales, customer relations, and financial results.
 
We rely on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of a large and complex information technology infrastructure to link our worldwide divisions. Like other information technology systems, ours is susceptible to a number of factors including, but not limited to, damage or interruptions resulting from a variety of causes such as obsolescence, natural disasters, power failures, human error, viruses and data security breaches. We upgrade and install new systems, which, if installed or programmed incorrectly or on a delayed timeframe, could cause delays or cancellations of customer orders, impede the manufacture or shipment of products, or disrupt the processing of transactions. We have implemented certain measures to reduce our risk related to system and network disruptions, but if a disruption occurs, we could incur significant losses and remediation costs.
 
Additionally, we rely on services provided by third-party vendors for a significant portion of our information technology support, development and implementation, which may make our operations vulnerable to such third parties’ failure to perform adequately.
 
Miscalculation of our infrastructure needs could adversely impact our financial results.
 
Projected requirements of our infrastructure investments may differ from actual levels if our volume growth is not as we anticipate. Our infrastructure investments generally are long-term in nature, and it is possible that these investments may not generate our expected return due to changes in the marketplace, failures to complete implementation, or other factors. Significant changes from our expected need for and/or returns on infrastructure investments could adversely affect our financial results.
 
Our reputation, sales, and earnings could be affected adversely if the quality of our products and services does not meet customer expectations.
 
There are occasions when we manufacture products with quality issues resulting from defective materials, manufacturing, packaging or design. Many of these issues are discovered before shipping, thus causing delays in shipping, delays in the manufacturing process, and occasionally cancelled orders. When issues are discovered after shipment, it can result in additional shipping costs, discounts, refunds, and loss of future sales. Both pre-shipping and post-shipping quality issues can result in adverse financial consequences and a negative impact on our reputation.
 
Some of our products are sold by third parties.
 
Our products are not sold only by us, but by third-party distributors and retailers as well. Some of our distributors also market products that compete with our products. Changes in the financial or business conditions or the purchasing decisions of these third parties or their customers could affect our sales and profitability.
 
We outsource some of our manufacturing. If there are significant changes in the quality control or financial or business condition of these outsourced manufacturers, our business could be negatively impacted.
 
We manufacture most of our products, but we also use third-party manufacturers, for example, for specialty jobs or capacity overflow. Outsourced manufacturers reduce our ability to prevent product quality issues, late deliveries, customer dissatisfaction and compliance with customer requirements for labor standards. Because of possible quality issues and customer dissatisfaction, outsourced manufacturers could have an adverse effect on our business or financial results.


8


Table of Contents

Changes in our business strategies may increase our costs and could affect the profitability of our businesses.
 
As changes in our business environment occur, we may need to adjust our business strategies to meet these changes or we may find it otherwise necessary to restructure our operations or particular businesses. When these changes occur, we may incur costs to change our business strategy and may need to write down the value of selected assets. We also may need to invest in new businesses that have short-term returns that are negative or low and whose ultimate business prospects are uncertain. In any of these events, our costs may increase, our assets may be impaired, or our returns on new investments may be lower than prior to the change in strategy.
 
Our substantial indebtedness could limit our ability to incur additional debt to fund business needs over the medium term.
 
As a result of the acquisitions in 2008 and 2007, our debt levels had significantly increased. Although we have reduced debt since the time of these acquisitions and we anticipate further debt reduction over the medium term from the generation of cash flow in our underlying businesses, circumstances both within and beyond our control could cause debt levels to remain elevated for a longer timeframe than anticipated. These higher debt levels could negatively impact our ability to meet other business needs or opportunities and could result in higher financing costs.
 
If our credit ratings are downgraded, we may have difficulty obtaining acceptable short- and long-term financing from the capital markets.
 
Credit ratings are a significant factor in our ability to raise short-term and long-term financing. The credit ratings assigned to us also impact the interest rates on our commercial paper and other borrowings. If our credit ratings are downgraded, our financial flexibility could decrease and the cost to borrow would increase.
 
The level of returns on pension and postretirement plan assets and the actuarial assumptions used for valuation purposes could affect our earnings and cash flows in future periods. Changes in accounting standards and government regulations could also affect our pension and postretirement plan expense and funding requirements.
 
Assumptions used in determining projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets for our pension plan and other postretirement benefit plans are evaluated by us in consultation with outside actuaries. In the event that we determine that changes are warranted in the assumptions used, such as the discount rate, expected long term rate of return, or health care costs, our future pension and projected postretirement benefit expenses and funding requirements could increase or decrease. Because of changing market conditions or changes in the participant population, the actuarial assumptions that we use may differ from actual results, which could have a significant impact on our pension and postretirement liability and related costs. Funding obligations are determined based on the value of assets and liabilities on a specific date as required under relevant government regulations for each plan. Future pension funding requirements, and the timing of funding payments, could be affected by legislation enacted by the relevant governmental authorities.
 
Our share price may be volatile.
 
Changes in our stock price may affect our access to or cost of financing from capital markets and may affect our stock-based compensation arrangements, among other things. Our stock price, which has at times experienced substantial volatility, is influenced by changes in the overall stock market and demand for equity securities in general. Other factors, including current performance and market expectations for our future performance, the level of perceived growth of our industries, and other company-specific events, can also impact our share price. There can be no assurance that our stock price will be less volatile in the future.
 
An impairment in the carrying value of goodwill could negatively impact our consolidated results of operations and net worth.
 
Goodwill is initially recorded at fair value and is not amortized, but is reviewed for impairment at least annually (or more frequently, if impairment indicators are present). In assessing the carrying value of goodwill, we


9


Table of Contents

make estimates and assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates, and discount rates based on our business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and management’s judgment in applying these factors. Goodwill valuations have been calculated using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows of each reporting unit. We could be required to evaluate the carrying value of goodwill prior to the annual assessment if we experience disruptions to the business, unexpected significant declines in operating results, divestiture of a significant component of our business or sustained market capitalization declines. These types of events and the resulting analyses could result in goodwill impairment charges in the future. Impairment charges could substantially affect our financial results in the periods of such charges.
 
Potential adverse developments in legal proceedings, investigations and other legal, compliance and regulatory matters, including those involving product and trade compliance, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act issues and other matters, could impact us materially.
 
Our financial results could be materially adversely impacted by an unfavorable outcome to pending or future litigation and investigations, including but not limited to, proceedings or lawsuits related to class actions seeking treble damages for alleged unlawful competitive practices, the impact of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), and other legal, compliance and regulatory matters, including, but not limited to, product, customs and trade compliance matters. See “Legal Proceedings” (Part  I, Item 3). There can be no assurance that any investigation or litigation outcome will be favorable.
 
Infringing intellectual property rights of third parties or inadequately acquiring or protecting our intellectual property and patents could harm our ability to compete or grow.
 
Because our products involve complex technology and chemistry, we are involved, from time to time, in litigation involving patents and other intellectual property. Parties have filed, and in the future may file, claims against us alleging that we have infringed their intellectual property rights. If we are held liable for infringement, we could be required to pay damages, obtain licenses or cease making or selling certain products. There can be no assurance that licenses will be available on commercially reasonable terms or will be available at all. The defense of these claims, whether or not meritorious, and the development of new technology could cause us to incur significant costs and could divert the attention of management.
 
We also could have our intellectual property infringed. We attempt to protect and restrict access to our intellectual property and proprietary information, by relying on the patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws of the U.S. and other countries, as well as on nondisclosure agreements. However, it may be possible for a third party to obtain our information without our authorization, to independently develop similar technologies, or to breach a non-disclosure agreement entered into with us. In addition, many of the countries in which we operate do not have intellectual property laws that protect proprietary rights as fully as in the U.S. The use of our intellectual property by someone else without our authorization could reduce or eliminate certain competitive advantages we have, cause us to lose sales or otherwise harm our business. Further, the costs associated with protecting our intellectual property rights could adversely impact our profitability.
 
We have obtained and applied for some U.S. and foreign trademark registrations and patents, and will continue to evaluate whether to register additional trademarks and seek patents as appropriate. We cannot guarantee that any of the pending applications will be approved by the applicable government authorities. Further, we cannot assure that the validity of our patents or our trademarks will not be challenged. In addition, third parties may be able to develop competing products using technology that avoids our patents.
 
We need to comply with numerous environmental, health, and safety laws.
 
Due to the nature of our business, we are subject to environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations, including those related to the disposal of hazardous waste from our manufacturing processes. Compliance with existing and future environmental, health and safety laws could subject us to future costs or liabilities; impact our production capabilities; constrict our ability to sell, expand or acquire facilities; and generally impact our financial performance. We have accrued liabilities for environmental clean-up sites, including sites for which governmental


10


Table of Contents

agencies have designated us as a potentially responsible party, where it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, because of the uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future expense to remediate currently identified sites and other sites, which could be identified in the future for cleanup, could be higher than the liability currently accrued.
 
We are subject to risks associated with the availability and coverage of various types of insurance.
 
We have various types of insurance including property, workers compensation and general liability. Insurance costs can be unpredictable and may adversely impact our financial results. We retain some portion of our insurable risks, and therefore, unforeseen or catastrophic losses in excess of insured limits could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
 
Proposed changes in U.S. tax legislation could materially impact our results.
 
Currently, the majority of our revenue is generated from customers located outside of the U.S., and a substantial portion of our assets and our employees, are located outside of the U.S. We have not accrued income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on undistributed earnings for most non-U.S. subsidiaries, because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested in the operations of those subsidiaries. Certain proposals could substantially increase our tax expense, which would substantially reduce our income and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows from operating activities.
 
Changes in our tax rates could affect our future results.
 
Our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, expirations of tax holidays, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, or changes in tax laws and regulations or their interpretation. We are subject to the regular examination of our income tax returns by various tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these examinations will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
 
The amount of various taxes we pay is subject to ongoing compliance requirements and audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities.
 
Our estimate of the potential outcome of uncertain tax issues is subject to our assessment of relevant risks, facts, and circumstances existing at that time. We use these assessments to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and other tax-related accounts. Our future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are made or resolved, which may impact our effective tax rate and/or our financial results.
 
We have deferred tax assets that we may not be able to use under certain circumstances.
 
If we are unable to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain jurisdictions, or if there is a significant change in the time period within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable or deductible, we could be required to increase our valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets. This would result in an increase in our effective tax rate, and would have an adverse effect on our future operating results. In addition, changes in statutory tax rates may change our deferred tax assets or liability balances, with either favorable or unfavorable impact on our effective tax rate. Our deferred tax assets may also be impacted by new legislation or regulation.
 
The risks described above are not exclusive. If any of the above risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition could suffer, which might cause the value of our securities to decline.
 
Item 1B.   UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
 
None.


11


Table of Contents

Item 2.   PROPERTIES
 
As of January 2, 2010, we operated approximately forty principal manufacturing facilities in excess of 100,000 square feet. The locations of such principal facilities and the operating segments for which they presently are used are as follows:
 
Pressure-sensitive Materials Segment
 
     
Domestic
  Peachtree City, Georgia; Fort Wayne, Greenfield and Lowell, Indiana; Fairport Harbor, Mentor and Painesville, Ohio; and Quakertown, Pennsylvania
     
Foreign
  Vinhedo, Brazil; Kunshan, China; Champ-sur-Drac, France; Gotha and Schwelm, Germany; Rodange, Luxembourg; Alphen and Hazerswoude, the Netherlands; and Cramlington, United Kingdom
 
Retail Information Services Segment
 
     
Domestic
  Greensboro and Lenoir, North Carolina; Miamisburg, Ohio
     
Foreign
  Kunshan, Nansha, Panyu, and Suzhou, China; Loehne and Sprockhovel, Germany; and Ancarano, Italy
 
Office and Consumer Products Segment
 
     
Domestic
  Chicopee, Massachusetts; and Meridian, Mississippi
     
Foreign
  Oberlaindern, Germany; and Juarez and Tijuana, Mexico
 
Other specialty converting businesses
 
     
Domestic
  Schererville, Indiana; Painesville, Ohio; and Clinton, South Carolina
     
Foreign
  Turnhout, Belgium; and Kunshan, China
 
In addition to our principal manufacturing facilities described above, our other principal facilities include our corporate headquarters facility and research center in Pasadena, California, and our divisional offices located in Brea, California; Framingham, Massachusetts; Mentor, Ohio; Hong Kong and Kunshan, China; Leiden, the Netherlands; and Zug, Switzerland.
 
We own all of our principal properties identified above, except for certain facilities in Brea, California; Hong Kong and Panyu, China; Loehne, Oberlaindern, and Sprockhovel, Germany; Juarez, Mexico; Greensboro, North Carolina; Mentor, Ohio; and Zug, Switzerland, which are leased.
 
All buildings owned or leased are considered suitable and generally adequate for our present needs. We generally expand production capacity and provide facilities as needed to meet increased demand. Owned buildings and plant equipment are insured against major losses from fire and other usual business risks, subject to deductibles. We are not aware of any material defects in title to, or significant encumbrances on, our properties except for certain mortgage liens.
 
Item 3.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
As of January 2, 2010, the Company has been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and/or other responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) at fourteen waste disposal or waste recycling sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or proceedings concerning alleged soil and/or groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of the Company’s liability has been agreed. The Company is participating with other PRPs at such sites, and anticipates that its share of cleanup costs will be determined pursuant to remedial agreements entered into in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other governmental authorities.
 
The Company has accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites, including sites in which governmental agencies have designated the Company as a PRP, where it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the cost or


12


Table of Contents

amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, because of the uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future expense to remediate the currently identified sites and any sites that could be identified in the future for cleanup could be higher than the liability currently accrued.
 
As of January 2, 2010, the Company’s estimated accrued liability associated with compliance and remediation costs was approximately $60 million. See also Note 8, “Contingencies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
 
On April 24, 2003, Sentry Business Products, Inc. filed a purported class action on behalf of direct purchasers of label stock in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the Company, UPM-Kymmene Corporation (“UPM”), Bemis Company Inc. (“Bemis”), and certain of their subsidiaries seeking treble damages and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, with allegations including that the defendants attempted to limit competition among themselves through anticompetitive understandings. Ten similar complaints were filed in various federal district courts. In November 2003, the cases were transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and consolidated for pretrial purposes. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on February 16, 2004, which the Company answered on March 31, 2004. On April 14, 2004, the court separated the proceedings as to class certification and merits discovery, and limited the initial phase of discovery to the issue of the appropriateness of class certification. On January 4, 2006, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On January 20, 2006, the Company filed an answer to the amended complaint. On August 14, 2006, the plaintiffs moved to certify a proposed class. The court substantively granted class certification on November 19, 2007. On July 22, 2008, the court held a hearing to set a schedule for merits discovery. On May 12, 2009, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with plaintiffs. Without admitting liability, the Company agreed to pay plaintiffs $36.5 million, plus up to $.5 million related to notice and administration expenses, in two equal installments of $18.5 million, which were paid on May 27, 2009 and July 15, 2009. On June 10, 2009, the district court entered an order preliminarily approving the settlement, and on September 17, 2009, the district court issued an order of final approval and judgment, dismissing all claims against the Company with prejudice. The Company recorded an accrual of $37 million for this settlement in the first quarter of 2009.
 
On May 21, 2003, The Harman Press filed in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, California, a purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers of label stock against the Company, UPM and UPM’s subsidiary Raflatac (“Raflatac”), seeking treble damages and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, with allegations including that the defendants attempted to limit competition among themselves through anticompetitive understandings. Three similar complaints were filed in various California courts. In November 2003, on petition from the parties, the California Judicial Council ordered the cases be coordinated for pretrial purposes. The cases were assigned to a coordination trial judge in the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco on March 30, 2004. On September 30, 2004, the Harman Press amended its complaint to add Bemis’ subsidiary Morgan Adhesives Company (“MACtac”) as a defendant. On January 21, 2005, American International Distribution Corporation filed a purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Superior Court for Chittenden County, Vermont. Similar actions were filed by Richard Wrobel, on February 16, 2005, in the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas; and by Chad and Terry Muzzey, on February 16, 2005, in the District Court of Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska. On February 17, 2005, Judy Benson filed a purported multi-state class action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Circuit Court for Cocke County, Tennessee. Without admitting liability, the Company has agreed to pay plaintiffs $2 million to resolve all claims related to the purported state class actions in the states of Kansas, Nebraska, Tennessee and Vermont, which was paid on December 28, 2009. These settlements remain subject to court approval, and a hearing in their regard is set for March 10, 2010. The Company recorded $2 million in the third quarter of 2009 in respect of the settlement of these claims. The Company intends to defend the purported California class action vigorously.
 
The Board of Directors created an ad hoc committee comprised of certain independent directors to oversee the foregoing matters.
 
The Company is unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect could be adverse and material.
 
In 2005, the Company contacted relevant authorities in the U.S. and reported on the results of an internal investigation of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The transactions at issue were carried


13


Table of Contents

out by a small number of employees of the Company’s reflective business in China, and involved, among other things, impermissible payments or attempted impermissible payments. The payments or attempted payments and the contracts associated with them appear to have been minor in amount and of limited duration. Sales of the Company’s reflective business in China in 2005 were approximately $7 million. In addition, on or about October 10, 2008, the Company notified relevant authorities that it had discovered questionable payments to certain foreign customs and other regulatory officials by some employees of its acquired companies. These payments were not made for the purpose of obtaining business from any governmental entity. Corrective and disciplinary actions have been taken with respect to both internal investigations and the Company has taken remedial measures to comply with the provisions of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. On July 28, 2009, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the SEC regarding the foregoing actions. Without admitting or denying liability, the Company agreed to disgorge approximately $.3 million and pay a $.2 million civil penalty. On August 10, 2009, the Company was advised by the U.S. Department of Justice that it has declined to take action against the Company in connection with the China reflective matters, which were voluntarily disclosed by the Company.
 
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits, claims, inquiries, and other regulatory and compliance matters, most of which are routine to the nature of the Company’s business. Based upon current information, management believes that the impact of the resolution of these other matters is not material to the Company’s financial position, or is not estimable.
 
Item 4.   SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
 
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.


14


Table of Contents

 
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF AVERY DENNISON(1)
 
                     
          Served as
   
          Executive Officer
  Former Positions and Offices
Name   Age     since   with Avery Dennison
 
Dean A. Scarborough(2)
President and Chief Executive Officer (also Director of Avery Dennison)
    54     August 1997   2000-2005   President and Chief Operating Officer
Daniel R. O’Bryant
Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
    52     January 2001   2001-2005   Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Diane B. Dixon
Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications and Advertising
    58     December 1985   1997-2000   Vice President, Worldwide Communications and Advertising
Anne Hill
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
    50     May 2007   2004-2006   Vice President, Global Human Resources, Chiron Corporation(3)
Robert M. Malchione
Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Technology
    52     August 2000   2000-2001   Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy
Susan C. Miller
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
    50     March 2008   2008

2007
1998-2006
  Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Vice President and General Counsel
Assistant General Counsel
Mitchell R. Butier
Corporate Vice President, Global Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
    38     March 2007   2007

2004-2006
  Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Vice President, Finance, Retail Information Services
Karyn E. Rodriguez
Vice President and Treasurer
    50     June 2001   1999-2001   Assistant Treasurer, Corporate Finance and Investments
Timothy G. Bond
Group Vice President, Office Products
    52     March 2008   2007

2003-2006
  Vice President and General Manager, Office Products Group
Vice President and General Manager, Office Products North America
Timothy S. Clyde
Group Vice President, Specialty Materials and Converting
    47     February 2001   2001-2007   Group Vice President, Office Products
R. Shawn Neville
Group Vice President, Retail Information Services
    47     June 2009   2008-2009

2004-2008
  Chief Executive Officer, Boathouse Sports(3)
President, Keds Division, Collective Brands, Inc.(3)
Donald A. Nolan
Group Vice President, Roll Materials
    49     March 2008   2005-2007   Senior Vice President, Global Packaging and Automotive Coatings
Valspar Corporation(3)
John M. Sallay
Senior Vice President, New Growth Platforms
    53     March 2009   2008

2004-2007
  Senior Vice President, Strategy, Staples, Inc.(3)
Chief Executive Officer, Manifold Products(3)
 
 
(1) All officers are elected to serve a one-year term and until their successors are elected and qualify.
 
(2) Mr. Scarborough was initially elected President and Chief Executive Officer effective May 1, 2005.
 
(3) Business experience during past 5 years prior to service with the Company.


15


Table of Contents

 
PART II
 
Item 5.   MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The information called for by subsections (a) and (b) for Item 5 appears in “Stockholder Return Performance” and “Corporate Information — Stock and Dividend Data” of our 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, and are incorporated herein by reference.
 
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
On October 26, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional 5 million shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock. This authorization increased the total shares authorized for repurchase to approximately 7.4 million. Repurchased shares may be reissued under the Company’s stock option and incentive plans or used for other corporate purposes.
 
Neither the Company nor any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) purchase any registered equity securities in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2009.
 
Item 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
Selected financial data for each of the Company’s last five fiscal years appears in “Five-year Summary” of our 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 7.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
 
The information called for by this Item is contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition” of the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 7A.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
The information called for by this Item is contained in “Market-Sensitive Instruments and Risk Management” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition” of the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 8.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
The information called for by this Item is contained in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders (including the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto, Statement of Management Responsibility for Financial Statements and Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm) and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Item 9.   CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
 
None.
 
Item 9A.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure


16


Table of Contents

controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based upon the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 2, 2010. (See Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders.)
 
Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2010, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
 
Item 9B.   OTHER INFORMATION
 
None.


17


Table of Contents

 
PART III
 
Item 10.   DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
The information concerning directors and corporate governance called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the 2010 Proxy Statement, filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report. Information concerning executive officers called for by this Item appears in Part I of this report. The information concerning any late filings under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is incorporated by reference from the 2010 Proxy Statement.
 
We have adopted a Code of Ethics (the “Code”). The Code applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Vice President, Global Finance, and Corporate Controller. Our Code is available on the Company’s Web site, www.averydennison.com, in the “Investors” section. We will satisfy disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or waiver from, any provision of the Code that applies to these officers disclosing the nature of such amendment or waiver on our Web site or in a current report on Form 8-K. Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which applies to our directors and employees, is also available on our Web site in the “Investors” section. The Company’s Web site address provided above is not intended to function as a hyperlink, and the contents of the Web site are not a part of this Form 10-K, nor are they incorporated herein by reference.
 
The information concerning the Company’s Audit Committee called for by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 2010 Proxy Statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.
 
Item 11.   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
The information called for by the Item is incorporated by reference from the 2010 Proxy Statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.
 
Item 12.   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
 
The information called for by the Item is incorporated by reference from the 2010 Proxy Statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.
 
Item 13.   CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
 
The information called for by the Item is incorporated by reference from the 2010 Proxy Statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.
 
Item 14.   PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
 
The information called for by the Item is incorporated by reference from the 2010 Proxy Statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.


18


Table of Contents

 
PART IV
 
Item 15.   EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
(a) Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedule and Exhibits
 
(1) (2) Financial statements and financial statement schedule filed as part of this report are listed in the accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule.
 
(3) Exhibits filed as a part of this report are listed in the Exhibit Index, which follows the financial statements and schedules referred to above. Each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15(c) is identified in the Exhibit Index.
 
(b) Those Exhibits and the Index thereto, required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K, are attached hereto.
 
(c) Those financial statement schedules required by Regulation S-X, which are excluded from the Company’s 2009 Annual Report by Rule 14a-3(b)(1) and which are required to be filed as a financial statement schedule to this report, are indicated in the accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule.


19


Table of Contents

 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
Avery Dennison Corporation
 
  By 
/s/             Daniel R. O’Bryant
Daniel R. O’Bryant
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
 
Dated: February 26, 2010
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and as of the dates indicated.
 
             
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
         
/s/  Dean A. Scarborough

Dean A. Scarborough
  President and Chief Executive Officer, Director   February 26, 2010
         
/s/  Daniel R. O’Bryant

Daniel R. O’Bryant
  Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
  February 26, 2010
         
/s/  Mitchell R. Butier

Mitchell R. Butier
  Corporate Vice President, Global Finance, and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
  February 26, 2010
         
/s/  Peter K. Barker

Peter K. Barker
  Director   February 26, 2010
         
/s/  Rolf Börjesson

Rolf Börjesson
  Director   February 26, 2010
         
/s/  John T. Cardis

John T. Cardis
  Director   February 26, 2010
         
/s/  Richard M. Ferry

Richard M. Ferry
  Director   February 26, 2010
         
/s/  Ken C. Hicks

Ken C. Hicks
  Director   February 26, 2010
         
/s/  Kent Kresa

Kent Kresa
  Chairman, Director   February 26, 2010
         
/s/  Peter W. Mullin

Peter W. Mullin
  Director   February 26, 2010


20


Table of Contents

             
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
         
/s/  David E. I. Pyott

David E. I. Pyott
  Director   February 26, 2010
         
/s/  Debra L. Reed

Debra L. Reed
  Director   February 26, 2010
         
/s/  Patrick T. Siewert

Patrick T. Siewert
  Director   February 26, 2010
         
/s/  Julia A. Stewart

Julia A. Stewart
  Director   February 26, 2010


21


Table of Contents

AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
 
 
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL
 
STATEMENT SCHEDULE
 
                 
Data incorporated by reference from the attached portions of the 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders of Avery Dennison Corporation:
               
Consolidated Financial Statements:
               
Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008
               
Consolidated Statement of Operations for 2009, 2008 and 2007
               
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for 2009, 2008 and 2007
               
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for 2009, 2008 and 2007
               
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
               
Statement of Management Responsibility for Financial Statements and Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
               
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
               
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of majority-owned subsidiaries. Investments in certain affiliates (20 percent to 50 percent) are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. Investments representing less than 20 percent are accounted for using the cost method of accounting.
 
With the exception of the Consolidated Financial Statements, Statement of Management Responsibility for Financial Statements and Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon listed above, and certain information referred to in Items 1, 5, 6, 7, and 7A, the information for which is included in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference, the Company’s 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders is not to be deemed “filed” as part of this report.
 
                 
Data submitted herewith:
               
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statement Schedule
    S-2          
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
    S-3          
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
    S-4          
 
All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.


S-1


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
 
To the Board of Directors
of Avery Dennison Corporation:
 
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements and of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting referred to in our report dated February 26, 2010 appearing in the 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders of Avery Dennison Corporation (which report and consolidated financial statements are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) also included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.
 
/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
February 26, 2010


S-2


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
 
(In millions)
 
                                         
          Additions              
    Balance at
    Charged to
                Balance
 
    Beginning
    Costs and
    From
    Deductions
    at End
 
    of Year     Expenses     Acquisitions     From Reserves(a)     of Year  
 
2009
                                       
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 41.8     $ 11.5     $ .4     $ (12.4 )   $ 41.3  
Allowance for sales returns
    15.5       7.8       .3       (8.7 )     14.9  
Inventory reserve
    64.6       23.1       2.3       (24.6 )     65.4  
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
    109.2       4.0             2.2       115.4  
2008
                                       
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 45.8     $ 10.1     $ .4     $ (14.5 )   $ 41.8  
Allowance for sales returns
    18.4       7.6       1.3       (11.8 )     15.5  
Inventory reserve
    77.3       21.2       4.0       (37.9 )     64.6  
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
    147.6       (45.3 )     9.6       (2.7 )     109.2  
2007
                                       
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 36.4     $ 1.6     $ 11.5     $ (3.7 )   $ 45.8  
Allowance for sales returns
    22.5       17.1             (21.2 )     18.4  
Inventory reserve
    44.4       19.5       36.0       (22.6 )     77.3  
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
    55.9       59.9       34.9       (3.1 )     147.6  
 
 
(a) Deductions from reserves include currency translation adjustments.


S-3


Table of Contents

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-38905, 333-64558, 333-103204, 333-120239 and 333-147369) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-54411, 33-58921, 33-63979, 333-38707, 333-38709, 333-107370, 33-107371, 333-107372, 333-109814, 333-124495, 333-143897 and 333-152508) of Avery Dennison Corporation of our report dated February 26, 2010 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 26, 2010 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.
 
/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
February 26, 2010


S-4


Table of Contents

AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
 
 
EXHIBIT INDEX
For the Year Ended January 2, 2010
 
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
 
                     
        Originally
   
Exhibit
      Filed as
   
No.
 
Item
 
Exhibit No.
 
Document(1)
 
                     
  (2 .1)   Agreement and Plan of Merger (with Paxar Corporation), dated March 22, 2007     2 .1   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 23, 2007
                     
  (3 .1)   Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed August 2, 2002 with the Office of Delaware Secretary of State     3 (i)   Third Quarterly Report for 2002 on Form 10-Q, filed November 12, 2002
                     
  (3 .2)   By-laws, as amended and restated October 22, 2009     3 .2.1   Third Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed November 12, 2009
                     
  (4 .2)   Indenture, dated as of March 15, 1991, between Registrant and Security Pacific National Bank, as Trustee (the “Indenture”)           Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-39491), filed March 19, 1991
                     
  (4 .2.2)   First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 16, 1993, between Registrant and BankAmerica National Trust Company, as successor Trustee (the “Supplemental Indenture”)     4 .4   Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-59642), filed March 17, 1993
                     
  (4 .2.5)   Officers’ Certificate establishing a series of Securities entitled “Medium-Term Notes, Series C” under the Indenture, as amended by the Supplemental Indenture     4 .7   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 12, 1995
                     
  (4 .2.6)   Officers’ Certificate establishing a series of Securities entitled “Medium-Term Notes, Series D” under the Indenture, as amended by the Supplemental Indenture     4 .8   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 16, 1996
                     
  (4 .3)   Indenture, dated July 3, 2001, between Registrant and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (successor to Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National Association), as trustee (“2001 Indenture”)     4 .1   Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-64558), filed July 3, 2001
                     
  (4 .3.1)   Officers’ Certificate establishing two series of Securities entitled “4.875% Notes due 2013” and “6.000% Notes due 2033,” respectively, each under the 2001 Indenture     4 .2   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 16, 2003
                     
  (4 .3.2)   4.875% Notes Due 2013     4 .3   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 16, 2003
                     
  (4 .3.3)   6.000% Notes Due 2033     4 .4   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 16, 2003


i


Table of Contents

                     
        Originally
   
Exhibit
      Filed as
   
No.
 
Item
 
Exhibit No.
 
Document(1)
 
                     
  (4 .5)   Indenture, dated as of September 25, 2007, between Registrant and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (“Bank of NY”)     99 .1   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 1, 2007
                     
  (4 .5.1)   6.625% Subsidiary Notes due 2017     99 .1   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 1, 2007
                     
  (4 .6)   Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2007, between Registrant and Bank of NY     4 .3   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2008
                     
  (4 .7)   Purchase Contract and Pledge Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2007, between Avery Dennison and Bank of New York, as Purchase Contract Agent, and Bank of New York as Collateral Agent, Custodial Agent and Securities Intermediary     4 .1   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
                     
  (4 .8)   Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2007, between Avery Dennison and Bank of New York     4 .2   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
                     
  (4 .9)   First Supplemental Indenture between Avery Dennison and Bank of New York, as Trustee, dated as of November 20, 2007     4 .3   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
                     
  (4 .10)   Form of Remarketing Agreement     4 .4   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
                     
  (4 .11)   Form of Corporate HiMEDS Unit Certificate     4 .5   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
                     
  (4 .12)   Form of Treasury HiMEDS Unit Certificate     4 .6   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
                     
  (4 .13)   Form of 5.350% Senior Notes due 2020     4 .7   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
                     
  (10 .1)   Avery Dennison Office Products Company (“ADOPC”) Credit Agreement, amended and restated, dated August 7, 2008     10 .2   Second Quarterly Report for 2008 on Form 10-Q, filed August 7, 2008
                     
  (10 .1.1)   ADOPC Second Amendment to Credit Agreement     99 .3   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 27, 2009
                     
  (10 .2)   Revolving Credit Agreement (“RCA”), amended and restated, August 10, 2007     10 .2.2   Third Quarterly Report for 2007 on Form 10-Q, filed November 7, 2007
                     
  (10 .2.1)   Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated RCA     99 .4   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 27, 2009
                     
  (10 .3)   *Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors     10 .3   1981 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 29, 1982
                     
  (10 .4)   *Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary     10 .4   2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2007
                     
  (10 .5)   *Executive Medical and Dental Plan (description)     10 .5   1981 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 29, 1982

ii


Table of Contents

                     
        Originally
   
Exhibit
      Filed as
   
No.
 
Item
 
Exhibit No.
 
Document(1)
 
                     
  (10 .8)   *Employment Agreement with D.A. Scarborough     10 .8.5   First Quarterly Report for 2005 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2005
                     
  (10 .8.3)   *Form of Employment Agreement     10 .8.4   First Quarterly Report for 2004 on Form 10-Q, filed May 6, 2004
                     
  (10 .8.3.1)   *Forms of Employment Agreement     10 .8.3.1   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
                     
  (10 .8.3.2)   *Forms of Amendment to Employment Agreement     10 .8.3.2   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
                     
  (10 .8.3.2a)   *Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement     10 .8.3.2   Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12, 2009
                     
  (10 .8.3.3)   *Form of Second Amendment to Employment Agreement     10 .8.3.3   Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12, 2009
                     
  (10 .8.4)   *Retention Agreement with D.R. O’Bryant     10 .8.6   First Quarterly Report for 2005 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2005
                     
  (10 .8.4.1)   *Amendment to Retention Agreement     10 .8.4.1   Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12, 2009
                     
  (10 .9)   *Executive Group Life Insurance Plan     10 .9   1982 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 25, 1983
                     
  (10 .10)   *Form of Indemnity Agreement between Registrant and certain directors and officers     10 .10   1986 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 27, 1987
                     
  (10 .10.1)   *Form of Indemnity Agreement between Registrant and certain directors and officers     10 .10.1   1993 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 18, 1994
                     
  (10 .11)   *Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, amended and restated (“SERP”)     10 .11.1   Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12, 2009
                     
  (10 .11.2)   *Letter of Grant to D.A. Scarborough under SERP     10 .11.2.1   Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12, 2009
                     
  (10 .11.4)   *Letter of Grant to D.R. O’Bryant under SERP     10 .11.4.1   Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12, 2009
                     
  (10 .12)   *Complete Restatement and Amendment of Executive Deferred Compensation Plan     10 .12   1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
                     
  (10 .13)   *Retirement Plan for Directors, amended and restated     10 .13.1   2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 28, 2003
                     
  (10 .15)   *Director Equity Plan, amended and restated (“Director Plan”)     10 .15.1   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
                     
  (10 .15.1)   *Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement under Director Plan     10 .15.1   2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004
                     
  (10 .16)   *Complete Restatement and Amendment of Executive Variable Deferred Compensation Plan (“EVDCP”)     10 .16   1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
                     
  (10 .16.1)   *Amendment No. 1 to EVDCP     10 .16.1   1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000

iii


Table of Contents

                     
        Originally
   
Exhibit
      Filed as
   
No.
 
Item
 
Exhibit No.
 
Document(1)
 
                     
  (10 .17)   *Complete Restatement and Amendment of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan     10 .17   1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
                     
  (10 .18)   *Complete Restatement and Amendment of Directors Variable Deferred Compensation Plan (“DVDCP”)     10 .18   1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
                     
  (10 .18.1)   *Amendment No. 1 to DVDCP     10 .18.1   1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
                     
  (10 .18.2)   *2005 Directors Variable Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated (“2005 DVDCP”)     10 .18.2   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
                     
  (10 .19)   *Stock Option and Incentive Plan, amended and restated (“Stock Plan”)     10 .19.8   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
                     
  (10 .19.1)   *Forms of NQSO Agreement under Stock Plan     10 .19.5   2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 27, 2008
                     
  (10 .19.2)   *Forms of Restricted Stock Agreement under Stock Plan     10 .19.8   First Quarterly Report for 2005 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2005
                     
  (10 .19.3)   *Forms of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Stock Plan     10 .19.2   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 13, 2006
                     
  (10 .19.4)   *Forms of Equity Awards under Stock Plan     10 .19.6   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 30, 2008
                     
  (10 .19.5)   *Forms of Equity Awards under Stock Plan     10 .19.6   Second Quarterly Report for 2008 on Form 10-Q, filed May 8, 2008
                     
  (10 .19.6)   *Forms of Equity Agreements under Stock Plan     10 .19.9   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
                     
  (10 .19.7)   *Additional Forms of Equity Agreements under Stock Plan     10 .19.10   Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed December 11, 2008
                     
  (10 .19.8)   *Form of Performance Unit Agreement     10 .19.8   2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 25, 2009
                     
  (10 .27)   *Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan, amended and restated (“LTIP”)     10 .27.1   2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004
                     
  (10 .28)   *Complete Restatement and Amendment of Executive Deferred Retirement Plan (“EDRP”)     10 .28   1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
                     
  (10 .28.1)   *Amendment No. 1 to EDRP     10 .28.1   1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
                     
  (10 .28.2)   *Amendment No. 2 to EDRP     10 .28.2   2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 4, 2002
                     
  (10 .29)   *Executive Leadership Compensation Plan, (“ELCP”)     10 .29.1   2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 17, 2005
                     
  (10 .30)   *Senior Executive Leadership Compensation Plan, amended and restated (“SELCP”)     10 .30.2   2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004

iv


Table of Contents

                     
        Originally
   
Exhibit
      Filed as
   
No.
 
Item
 
Exhibit No.
 
Document(1)
 
                     
  (10 .31)   *Executive Variable Deferred Retirement Plan, amended and restated (“EVDRP”)     10 .31.5   2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004
                     
  (10 .31.1)   *2004 EVDRP     4 .1   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-109814), filed October 20, 2003
                     
  (10 .31.2)   *2005 EVDRP, amended and restated     10 .31.2   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
                     
  (10 .32)   *Benefits Restoration Plan, amended and restated (“BRP”)     10 .32.1   Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed December 11, 2008
                     
  (10 .33)   *Restated Trust Agreement for Employee Stock Benefit Trust     10 .33.1   1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 26, 1998
                     
  (10 .33.1)   *Common Stock Purchase Agreement     10 .2   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 25, 1996
                     
  (10 .33.2)   *Restated Promissory Note     10 .33.3   1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 26, 1998
                     
  (10 .34)   *Amended and Restated Capital Accumulation Plan (“CAP”)     10 .34   1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
                     
  (10 .34.1)   *Trust under CAP     4 .2   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-38707), filed October 24, 1997
                     
  (10 .34.2)   *Amendment No. 1 to CAP     10 .34.2   1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
                     
  (10 .35)   *Key Executive Change of Control Severance Plan     10 .35   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 9, 2009
                     
  (10 .36)   *Executive Severance Plan     10 .36   Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 9, 2009
                     
  (23 .1)   Consent of Ernst & Young     23 .1   Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed August 29, 2007
                     
  (23 .2)   Consent of Ernst & Young     23 .3   Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-147369), filed November 14, 2007
                     
  (99 .2)   Stock Ownership Policy     99 .2   2007 Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed March 15, 2007
 
 
(1) Unless otherwise noted, the File Number for all documents is File No. 1-7685.
 
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an Exhibit to this Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15.

v


Table of Contents

 
SUBMITTED HEREWITH:
 
         
Exhibit No.
 
Item
  3 .1   Restated Certification of Incorporation, filed August 2, 2002 with the Office of Delaware Secretary of State, is incorporated by reference to the Third Quarterly Report for 2002 on Form 10-Q, filed November 12, 2002
  3 .2   By-laws, as amended and restated, is incorporated by reference to the Third Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed November 12, 2009
  10 .1   Avery Dennison Office Products Company (“ADOPC”) Credit Agreement, amended and restated, is incorporated by reference to the Second Quarterly Report for 2008 on Form 10-Q, filed August 7, 2008
  10 .1.1   ADOPC Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, is incorporated by reference to the current report on Form 8-K, filed January 27, 2009
  10 .2   Revolving Credit Agreement (“RCA”), amended and restated, is incorporated by reference to the Third Quarterly Report for 2007 on Form 10-Q, filed November 7, 2007
  10 .2.1   Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated RCA, is incorporated by reference to the current report on Form 8-K, filed January 27, 2009
  12     Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Changes
  13     Portions of Annual Report to Shareholders for fiscal year ended January 2, 2010
  21     List of Subsidiaries
  23     Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (see page S-4)
  24     Power of Attorney
  31 .1   D. A. Scarborough Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  31 .2   D. R. O’Bryant Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  32 .1   D. A. Scarborough Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  32 .2   D. R. O’Bryant Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an Exhibit to this Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15.
 
STATEMENT AND AGREEMENT REGARDING
LONG-TERM DEBT OF REGISTRANT
 
Unless indicated above, Registrant has no instrument with respect to long-term debt under which securities authorized thereunder equal or exceed 10% of the total assets of Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Registrant agrees to furnish a copy of its long-term debt instruments to the Commission upon request.


vi

exv12
Exhibit 12
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Dollars in millions)
                         
    2009     2008     2007(3)  
Earnings:
                       
Income (loss) before taxes
  $ (790.9 )   $ 270.6     $ 375.3  
Add: Fixed charges (1)
    124.5       158.9       142.6  
Amortization of capitalized interest
    3.3       3.2       3.0  
Less: Capitalized interest
    (4.2 )     (6.2 )     (5.9 )
 
                 
 
  $ (667.3 )   $ 426.5     $ 515.0  
 
                 
 
                       
Fixed charges: (1)
                       
Interest expense
  $ 85.3     $ 115.9     $ 105.2  
Capitalized interest
    4.2       6.2       5.9  
Interest portion of leases
    35.0       36.8       31.5  
 
                 
 
  $ 124.5     $ 158.9     $ 142.6  
 
                 
 
                       
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (2)
          2.7       3.6  
 
                 
(1)   The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing earnings by fixed charges. For this purpose, “earnings” consist of income before taxes plus fixed charges and amortization of capitalized interest, less capitalized interest. “Fixed charges” consist of interest expense, capitalized interest and the portion of rent expense (estimated to be 35%) on operating leases deemed representative of interest.
 
(2)   For the year ended January 2, 2010, the Company’s earnings were not sufficient to cover fixed charges by $791.8. The loss primarily reflected the non-cash goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $832 and loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $21 recorded in the first quarter of 2009, and legal settlement costs of $41 recorded in 2009.
 
(3)   2007 included results for Paxar Corporation from June 15, 2007 (acquisition date) to December 29, 2007, as well as the incremental interest expense related to the Company’s increased borrowings to fund the acquisition.

exv13
2009 Annual Report — Businesses at a Glance
                 
 
SEGMENT   Pressure-sensitive Materials   Retail Information Services   Office and Consumer Products   Other specialty converting businesses
 
BUSINESSES
  Roll Materials
Graphics and Reflective Products
  Information and Brand Management
Printer Systems
Fastener
  Office Products   Specialty Tape
Radio Frequency
Identification (RFID)
Industrial and Automotive Products
Performance Films
Business Media
 
SALES
(in millions)
  $3,300    $1,323    $849  $480 
 
PERCENT OF TOTAL SALES
  56%    22%    14%    8% 
 
GLOBAL BRANDS
  Fasson, Avery Graphics,
Avery Dennison
  Avery Dennison, Monarch   Avery   Avery Dennison
 
PRODUCTS
  Pressure-sensitive roll materials, flexible packaging, roll-fed shrink film, water and solvent-based performance polymer adhesives and engineered films, graphic imaging media and reflective materials   Solution sets throughout the retail supply chain, including manufacturing, supply chain, in-store information, permanent branding and point-of-sale branding products   Self-adhesive labels, binders, sheet protectors, dividers, online templates and printing, writing instruments, T-shirt transfers and do-it-yourself card products   Specialty tapes, industrial adhesives, architectural and engineered films, automotive exterior films and labels, functional packaging labels, point-of-purchase and display tags, metallized pigments, self-adhesive postage stamps, RFID inlays and durable tags
 
MARKETS
  Home and personal care, food, beverages, wine and spirits, beer, pharmaceutical and healthcare, durables, variable information, fleets, architecture, traffic, safety and transportation original equipment   Retail brand owners and manufacturers, apparel and hard goods retail stores and supply chains, food service stores and supply chains, logistics, pharmaceuticals, automotive and other manufacturers   Professional, personal and on-the-go organization and identification, education   Architectural, apparel, automotive, building and construction, consumer, durables, electronics, graphic arts, industrial, logistics, medical and healthcare, retail point-of-purchase, and security printing
 
CUSTOMERS
  Global label converters, brand owners, consumer products package designers, packaging engineers and manufacturers, industrial manufacturers, printers, designers, government agencies, sign manufacturers and graphic vendors   Global retailers and brand owners, apparel and consumer goods manufacturers, restaurant and food service chains, grocery and drug store chains, and a variety of other industries   Office products superstores, major retailers, office professionals, school administrators, small business owners and consumers   Industrial and original equipment manufacturers, medical products and device manufacturers, converters, packagers and consumer products companies
 


 

 
Five-year Summary

 
                                                                                         
          2009(1)            2008           2007           2006           2005        
             
(Dollars in millions, except %
  5-Year Compound
                                                             
and per share amounts)   Growth Rate     Dollars     %     Dollars     %     Dollars     %     Dollars     %     Dollars     %  
   
 
For the Year
                                                                                       
Net sales
    2.3 %   $ 5,952.7       100.0     $ 6,710.4       100.0     $ 6,307.8       100.0     $ 5,575.9       100.0     $ 5,473.5       100.0  
Gross profit
    2.2       1,586.5       26.7       1,727.0       25.7       1,722.4       27.3       1,538.0       27.6       1,476.9       27.0  
Marketing, general and administrative expense
    5.8       1,268.8       21.3       1,304.3       19.4       1,182.5       18.7       1,011.1       18.1       987.9       18.0  
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges
    N/A       832.0       14.0                                                  
Interest expense
    7.8       85.3       1.4       115.9       1.7       105.2       1.7       55.5       1.0       57.9       1.1  
Other expense, net(2)
    40.3       191.3       3.2       36.2       0.5       59.4       0.9       36.2       0.6       63.6       1.2  
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes
    (216.1 )     (790.9 )     (13.3 )     270.6       4.0       375.3       5.9       435.2       7.8       367.5       6.7  
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
    (186.0 )     (44.2 )     (0.7 )     4.5       0.1       71.8       1.1       76.7       1.4       75.3       1.4  
Income (loss) from continuing operations
    (221.6 )     (746.7 )     (12.5 )     266.1       4.0       303.5       4.8       358.5       6.4       292.2       5.3  
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(3)
    N/A             N/A             N/A             N/A       14.7       N/A       (65.4 )     N/A  
Net income (loss)
    (221.8 )     (746.7 )     (12.5 )     266.1       4.0       303.5       4.8       373.2       6.7       226.8       4.1  
 
 
                                                                                         
          2009           2008           2007           2006           2005        
   
 
Per Share Information
                                                                                       
Income (loss) per common share from continuing operations
    (220.7 )%   $ (7.21 )           $ 2.70             $ 3.09             $ 3.59             $ 2.92          
Income (loss) per common share from continuing operations, assuming dilution
    (220.9 )     (7.21 )             2.70               3.07               3.57               2.91          
Net income (loss) per common share
    (220.9 )     (7.21 )             2.70               3.09               3.74               2.27          
Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution
    (221.0 )     (7.21 )             2.70               3.07               3.72               2.26          
Dividends per common share
    (3.9 )     1.22               1.64               1.61               1.57               1.53          
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (in millions)
    0.7       103.6               98.4               98.1               99.8               100.1          
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution (in millions)
    0.6       103.6               98.7               98.9               100.4               100.5          
                                                                                         
Book value per share at fiscal year end
    (3.6 )   $ 12.94             $ 17.78             $ 20.22             $ 17.26             $ 15.26          
Market price per share at fiscal year end
    (9.5 )     36.49               31.53               53.41               67.93               55.27          
Market price per share range
            17.26 to               25.02 to               49.69 to               55.09 to               50.30 to          
              40.02               53.14               69.67               69.11               62.53          
 
 
At End of Year
                                                                                       
Working capital (deficit)
          $ (134.5 )           $ (127.6 )           $ (419.3 )           $ (12.1 )           $ 56.0          
Property, plant and equipment, net
            1,354.7               1,493.0               1,591.4               1,309.4               1,295.7          
Total assets
            5,002.8               6,035.7               6,244.8               4,324.9               4,228.9          
Long-term debt
            1,088.7               1,544.8               1,145.0               501.6               723.0          
Total debt
            1,624.3               2,209.8               2,255.8               968.0               1,087.7          
Shareholders’ equity
            1,362.6               1,750.0               1,989.4               1,696.2               1,521.6          
                                                                                         
Number of employees
            31,300               35,700               37,300               22,700               22,600          
 
 
Other Information
                                                                                       
Depreciation expense(4)
          $ 187.6             $ 204.6             $ 184.1             $ 153.8             $ 154.2          
Research and development expense(4)
            90.7               94.0               95.5               87.9               85.4          
                                                                                         
Effective tax rate(4)
            5.6 %             1.7 %             19.1 %             17.6 %             20.5 %        
Return on average shareholders’ equity (percent)
            (55.7 )             13.1               16.5               22.7               14.5          
Return on average total capital (percent)
            (20.6 )             8.8               10.6               15.7               10.0          
 
 
(1) Results for 2009 reflect a 53-week period.
 
(2) 2009 includes pretax charges of $191.3 for restructuring costs, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges and other items.
2008 includes net pretax charges of $36.2 for restructuring costs, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges and other items.
2007 includes net pretax charges of $59.4 for asset impairment charges, restructuring costs, lease cancellation charges and other items.
2006 includes net pretax charges of $36.2 for restructuring costs, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges, environmental remediation and other items, partially offset by gain on sale of investment and assets.
2005 includes net pretax charge of $63.6 for restructuring costs, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges and legal accrual related to a lawsuit, partially offset by gain on sale of assets.
 
(3) Results for 2006 include a tax benefit of $14.9 due to capital losses arising from the sale of discontinued operations and a pretax gain on the sale of discontinued operations of $1.3.
Results for 2005 include impairment charges for goodwill and finite-lived intangible assets of $74.4 associated with the expected divestiture of a business.
 
(4) 2005 and 2006 amounts related to continuing operations.

18 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

Stockholder Return Performance
The following graph compares the Company’s cumulative stockholder return on its common stock, including the reinvestment of dividends, with the return on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (the “S&P 500 Index”) and the average return, weighted by market capitalization, of the peer group set forth below (“Peer Group”) for the five-year period ending December 31, 2009. The Company has also included the median return of the Peer Group in the graph as an additional comparison. The Peer Group consists of 50 publicly-traded U.S. companies selected on the basis of market diversity, international focus and investment, market volatility, and product line mix.
The Peer Group is comprised of Air Products & Chemicals Inc., ArvinMeritor Inc., Baker-Hughes Incorporated, Ball Corporation, Bemis Company, Inc., Black & Decker Corporation, Cabot Corporation, Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., Crane Company, Crown Holdings Inc., Cummins Inc., Dana Holding Corporation, Danaher Corporation, Dover Corporation, Eaton Corporation, Ecolab Incorporated, Ferro Corporation, FMC Corporation, Fuller (H. B.) Company, Goodrich Corporation, Grace (W R) & Company, Harley-Davidson Inc., Harris Corporation, Harsco Corporation, Illinois Tool Works Incorporated, Ingersoll-Rand Company, MASCO Corporation, MeadWestvaco Corporation, NACCO Industries, Newell Rubbermaid Incorporated, Olin Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., PACCAR Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Pentair Inc., Pitney Bowes Incorporated, PolyOne Corporation, Potlatch Corporation, P.P.G. Industries Incorporated, The Sherwin-Williams Company, Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, Snap-On Incorporated, Sonoco Products Company, Stanley Works, Tecumseh Products Company, Temple-Inland Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Thomas & Betts Corporation, Timken Company and Trinity Industries.
 
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
As of December 31, 2009
 
 
 
Total Return Analysis(1)
                                                 
    12/31/04     12/31/05     12/31/06     12/31/07     12/31/08     12/31/09  
   
 
Avery Dennison Corp
  $ 100.00     $ 94.75     $ 119.47     $ 95.97     $ 61.43     $ 71.70  
S&P 500 Index
    100.00       104.91       121.46       128.13       80.73       102.11  
Market Basket (Weighted Average)(2)
    100.00       102.48       124.24       154.38       91.59       127.55  
Market Basket (Median)
    100.00       99.05       121.69       122.97       77.88       115.22  
 
 
(1) Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2004, and the reinvestment of dividends; chart reflects performance on a calendar year basis.
 
(2) Weighted average is weighted by market capitalization.
 
Stock price performance reflected in the above graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.

We identify your world 19


 

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial Condition

 
ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis provides a narrative concerning our financial performance and condition that should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements. It includes the following sections:
 
         
Definition of Terms
    20  
Forward-looking Statements
    20  
Overview and Outlook
    20  
Analysis of Results of Operations
    22  
Results of Operations by Segment
    24  
Financial Condition
    26  
Uses and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures
    32  
Transactions with Related Persons
    32  
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
    32  
Recent Accounting Requirements
    35  
Safe Harbor Statement
    35  
Market-Sensitive Instruments and Risk Management
    36  
 
DEFINITION OF TERMS
 
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. Our discussion of financial results includes several non-GAAP measures to provide additional information concerning Avery Dennison Corporation’s (the “Company’s”) performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, nor are they a substitute for, GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are intended to supplement the presentation of our financial results that are prepared in accordance with GAAP. Refer to “Uses and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures.”
 
We use the following terms:
  o  Organic sales growth (decline) refers to the change in sales excluding the estimated impact of currency translation, acquisitions and divestitures, and the estimated impact of the extra week in fiscal year 2009;
  o  Segment operating income (loss) refers to income (loss) before interest and taxes;
  o  Free cash flow refers to cash flow from operations and net (purchases) proceeds from sale of investments, less payments for capital expenditures, software and other deferred charges; and
  o  Operational working capital refers to trade accounts receivable and inventories, net of accounts payable.
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
Certain statements contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis are “forward-looking statements” and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Refer to our “Safe Harbor Statement” contained elsewhere in this report.
 
OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK
 
Overview
Sales
Our sales from operations declined 11% in 2009 compared to a growth of 6% in 2008, reflecting weakness in market conditions.
 
                         
Estimated change in sales due to:   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Organic sales growth (decline)
    (9 )%     (3 )%     1 %
Extra week in fiscal year(1)
    1              
Foreign currency translation
    (4 )     3       5  
Acquisitions, net of divestitures
          7       8  
 
 
Reported sales growth (decline)(2)
    (11 )%     6 %     13 %
 
 
(1) Our 2009 fiscal year consisted of a 53-week period, with the extra week reflected in the first quarter. Normally, each fiscal year consists of 52 weeks, but every fifth or sixth year consists of 53 weeks.
 
(2) Totals may not sum due to rounding.
 
Net Income
In 2009, we had a net loss of approximately $747 million, compared to a net income of approximately $266 million in 2008.
 
Negative factors affecting the change in net income included:
  o  Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets
  o  Lower net sales
  o  Higher restructuring and asset impairment charges related to cost reduction actions
  o  Higher employee-related costs
  o  Higher legal settlement costs
  o  Investment in growth initiatives
  o  Loss on debt extinguishment
 
Positive factors affecting the change in net income included:
  o  Cost savings from productivity improvement initiatives, including savings from restructuring actions, and cost reductions consistent with a recessionary environment
  o  Changes in pricing to offset the cumulative impact of inflation experienced in 2008
  o  Lower transition costs related to acquisition integrations
  o  Lower raw material and energy costs
 
Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
We perform our annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets (“goodwill impairment”) during the fourth quarter. However, certain factors may result in the need to perform a goodwill impairment test prior to the fourth quarter, including significant underperformance of our business relative to expected operating results, significant adverse economic and industry trends, significant decline in our market capitalization for an extended period of time relative to net book value, or a decision to divest an individual business within a reporting unit. Based upon our assessment of these factors in connection with the preparation of our first quarter financial statements, we determined that there was a need to initiate an interim goodwill impairment test. The factors considered included both a sustained decline in our stock price and a decline in our 2009 revenue projections for the retail information services reporting unit, following lower than expected revenues in March 2009, which continued in April 2009. The peak season for the retail information

20 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

services reporting unit has traditionally been March through the end of the second quarter.
Our interim impairment analysis indicated that the fair value of each of our reporting units exceeded its carrying value, except for our retail information services reporting unit, which had a fair value less than its carrying value.
In performing the required goodwill impairment test, we primarily apply a present value (discounted cash flow) method to determine the fair value of the reporting units with goodwill. Our reporting units, which are composed of either a discrete business or an aggregation of businesses with similar economic characteristics, consist of roll materials; retail information services; office and consumer products; graphics and reflective products; industrial products; and business media.
In the first quarter of 2009, we recorded non-cash impairment charges of $832 million for the retail information services reporting unit, of which $820 million is related to goodwill and $12 million is related to indefinite-lived intangible assets. We completed our interim goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of 2009, with no additional impairment charge recorded thereafter. Results from our annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of 2009 indicated that no impairment had occurred.
Refer to Note 3, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
 
Acquisitions
We completed the acquisition of Paxar Corporation (“Paxar”) on June 15, 2007. The combination of the Paxar business into our Retail Information Services segment increases our presence in the retail information and brand identification market, combines complementary strengths and broadens the range of our product and service capabilities, improves our ability to meet customer demands for product innovation and improved quality of service, and facilitates expansion into new product and geographic segments. See “Paxar Acquisition-related Actions” below for information on costs incurred and cost synergies achieved during integration.
We completed the acquisition of DM Label Group (“DM Label”) on April 1, 2008. DM Label operations are included in our Retail Information Services segment.
See Note 2, “Acquisitions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
 
Paxar Acquisition-related Actions
From June 2007 through 2008, actions to integrate Paxar resulted in pretax charges of $99.7 million, including severance and employee-related costs, asset impairment charges, and lease cancellation costs in our Retail Information Services segment.
Incremental cost synergies resulting from the integration were approximately $12 million in 2009, approximately $88 million in 2008, and approximately $20 million in 2007.
 
Cost Reduction Actions
Q4 2008 — 2010 Actions
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we initiated restructuring actions that are now expected to generate approximately $180 million in annualized savings by the middle of 2010, of which $75 million, net of transition costs, was realized in 2009. We expect to incur approximately $160 million of total restructuring charges associated with these actions, of which approximately $110 million represents cash charges. At the end of 2009, we achieved run-rate savings representing approximately 75% of our target.
From the fourth quarter of 2008 through the end of 2009, we recorded approximately $141 million in pretax charges related to these restructuring actions, consisting of severance and related employee costs, asset impairment charges, and lease cancellation costs. Severance and employee-related costs related to approximately 4,035 positions, impacting all of our segments and geographic regions.
The remainder of the costs associated with this action is expected to be incurred in the first half of 2010.
 
Q1 2008 — Q3 2008 Actions
During the first three quarters of 2008, we implemented cost reduction actions resulting in pretax charges of $22.8 million, including severance and employee-related costs for approximately 645 positions, asset impairment charges, and lease cancellation costs. We achieved annualized savings of approximately $20 million (most of which benefited 2009) as a result of these actions.
 
Q4 2006 — 2007 Actions
We incurred $31.4 million in pretax charges related to cost reduction actions initiated from late 2006 through the end of 2007, including severance and employee related costs for approximately 555 positions, asset impairment charges, and lease cancellation costs. Savings from these restructuring actions, net of transition costs, were approximately $8 million in 2009, $32 million in 2008 and $5 million in 2007.
Refer to Note 10, “Cost Reduction Actions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
 
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow, which is a non-GAAP measure, refers to cash flow from operating activities and net (purchases) proceeds from sale of investments, less payments for capital expenditures, software and other deferred charges. We use free cash flow as a measure of funds available for other corporate purposes, such as dividends, debt reduction, acquisitions, and repurchases of common stock. Management believes that this measure provides meaningful supplemental information to our investors to assist them in their financial analysis of the Company. This measure is not intended to represent the residual cash available for discretionary purposes. Refer to the discussion under “Uses and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures” elsewhere in this report for further information regarding limitations of this measure.
 

We identify your world 21


 

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
(continued)

                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 569.0     $ 539.7     $ 499.4  
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
    (72.2 )     (128.5 )     (190.5 )
Purchase of software and other deferred charges
    (30.6 )     (63.1 )     (64.3 )
(Purchases) proceeds from sale of investments, net(1)
    (.5 )     17.2        
 
 
Free cash flow
  $ 465.7     $ 365.3     $ 244.6  
 
 
(1) Net (purchases) proceeds from sale of investments relate to net purchasing/sales activities of securities held by our captive insurance company in 2009 and 2008, and sales of other investments in 2008.
 
The increase in free cash flow in 2009 of $100.4 million is primarily due to operational working capital productivity in inventory and collection of trade accounts receivables, as well as lower spending on capital expenditures, software and other deferred charges, partially offset by lower income from operations.
The increase in free cash flow in 2008 of $120.7 million is primarily due to increased cash flow provided by operating activities and reduced capital spending, partially offset by lower income from operations.
See “Analysis of Results of Operations” and “Liquidity” in “Financial Condition” below for more information.
 
Dividend
On July 30, 2009 and October 22, 2009, we declared a dividend of $.20 per share, a reduction from our previous dividend of $.41 per share in the same periods in 2008. This action was taken in response to the possibility of continued poor market conditions beyond 2009, to focus on reducing debt, and to meet increased pension funding requirements.
 
Legal Proceedings
We are a named defendant in purported class actions in the U.S. seeking treble damages and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices.
The Board of Directors created an ad hoc committee comprised of certain independent directors to oversee the foregoing matters.
As previously disclosed and reported to authorities in the U.S., we have discovered instances of conduct by certain employees that potentially violate the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. We reported that conduct to authorities in the U.S. and have entered into a settlement agreement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in this regard. Refer to Note 8, “Contingencies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
We are unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect could be adverse and material. These and other matters are reported in Note 8, “Contingencies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Outlook
Certain factors that we believe may contribute to 2010 results are listed below.
The effect of the fiscal calendar change (extra week in 2009) is anticipated to reduce sales in 2010 by approximately $50 million compared to 2009.
We expect incremental pension expense of approximately $10 million in 2010. At year end 2009, actuarial projections indicate that we will be required to make total pension contributions in the range of $200 million to $300 million from 2009 through 2013.
We anticipate restructuring charges of approximately $15 million to $20 million in 2010. We expect to realize an incremental $70 million of restructuring savings, net of transition costs, in 2010.
We anticipate lower interest expense in 2010 due primarily to retirements and repayments of certain indebtedness. Our assumptions on interest expense are subject to changes in market rates throughout the year.
The annual effective tax rate will be impacted by future events including changes in tax laws, geographic income mix, tax audits, closure of tax years, legal entity restructuring, and release of, or accrual for, valuation allowances on deferred tax assets. The effective tax rate can potentially have wide variances from quarter to quarter, resulting from interim reporting requirements and the recognition of discrete events.
We anticipate increased investment in new growth opportunities and infrastructure.
We anticipate our capital and software expenditures to be in the range of $125 million to $150 million in 2010.
We are targeting a reduction of debt of at least $350 million from the end of the second quarter of 2009 through the end of 2010. In the second half of 2009, we reduced debt by approximately $300 million.
 
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Income Before Taxes:
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Net sales
  $ 5,952.7     $ 6,710.4     $ 6,307.8  
Cost of products sold
    4,366.2       4,983.4       4,585.4  
 
 
Gross profit
    1,586.5       1,727.0       1,722.4  
Marketing, general and administrative expense
    1,268.8       1,304.3       1,182.5  
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges
    832.0              
Interest expense
    85.3       115.9       105.2  
Other expense, net
    191.3       36.2       59.4  
 
 
Income (loss) before taxes
  $ (790.9 )   $ 270.6     $ 375.3  
 
 
                         
                         
As a Percent of Sales:   %     %     %  
   
 
Gross profit (margin)
    26.7       25.7       27.3  
Marketing, general and administrative expense
    21.3       19.4       18.7  
Income (loss) before taxes
    (13.3 )     4.0       5.9  
 
 
 
Sales
Sales decreased 11% in 2009 and increased 6% in 2008.
The decrease in 2009 reflected lower sales on an organic basis, partially offset by incremental sales from the DM Label acquisition (approximately $9 million) and the estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter of 2009. In addition, foreign currency translation had an unfavorable impact on the change in sales of approximately $269 million. On an

22 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

organic basis, sales declined 9% in 2009, as continued deterioration in market conditions contributed to volume declines, partially offset by the effect of changes in pricing to offset the cumulative impact of inflation experienced in 2008.
The increase in 2008 was driven primarily by acquisitions and the effect of currency translation. The acquisitions of Paxar and DM Label increased sales by an estimated $450 million in 2008. Foreign currency translation had a favorable impact on the change in sales of approximately $167 million. On an organic basis, sales declined 3% in 2008, which reflected worsening global economic conditions in 2008, which were experienced first in the U.S., then in Western Europe, and then in our emerging markets.
Organic sales growth or decline by our major regions of operation was as follows:
 
                         
    2009     2008     2007  
   
 
U.S. 
    (9 )%     (7 )%     (4 )%
Europe
    (12 )%     (1 )%     3 %
Asia
    (3 )%     1 %     9 %
Latin America
    (2 )%     1 %     4 %
 
 
 
Refer to “Results of Operations by Segment” for information on segments.
 
Gross Profit Margin
Gross profit margin in 2009 increased from 2008, primarily due to benefits from restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives, the effect of changes in pricing to offset the cumulative impact of inflation experienced in 2008, and lower raw material and energy costs. These benefits were partially offset by reduced fixed-cost leverage due to lower volume, unfavorable segment mix, and higher employee costs.
Gross profit margin in 2008 decreased from 2007 as higher gross profit margin associated with sales from the Paxar business and savings from restructuring actions and other sources of productivity were more than offset by the carryover effect of prior year price competition in the roll materials business, higher raw material and other cost inflation, negative product mix shifts (lower sales of higher gross profit margin products), as well as reduced fixed-cost leverage on an organic basis.
 
Marketing, General and Administrative Expense
Marketing, general and administrative expense in 2009 decreased from 2008, as cost reductions consistent with a recessionary environment, benefits from restructuring and productivity initiatives, and the impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $40 million) were partially offset by:
  o  Higher employee costs
  o  Investment in growth initiatives
  o  Estimated costs associated with the extra week
 
Marketing, general and administrative expense in 2008 increased from 2007, as benefits from productivity improvement initiatives and lower net transition costs related to the Paxar and DM Label acquisitions were more than offset by:
  o  Costs associated with the acquired businesses (totaling approximately $123 million, including $15 million in incremental amortization of intangibles)
  o  The negative impact of fluctuations in foreign currency (approximately $13 million)
  o  Higher employee costs
 
Interest Expense
In 2009, interest expense decreased 26%, or approximately $31 million, due to retirements and repayments of certain indebtedness and lower interest rates on short-term borrowings.
In 2008, interest expense increased 10%, or approximately $11 million, due to an increase in borrowings to fund the Paxar and DM Label acquisitions, partially offset by the benefit of lower interest rates.
 
Other Expense, net
                         
(In millions, pretax)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Restructuring costs
  $ 86.8     $ 29.8     $ 21.6  
Asset impairment and lease cancellation charges
    42.3       10.9       17.5  
Asset impairment — integration related
                18.4  
Other items
    62.2       (4.5 )     1.9  
 
 
Other expense, net
  $ 191.3     $ 36.2     $ 59.4  
 
 
 
For all three years presented, “Other expense, net” consisted of charges for restructuring, including severance and other employee-related costs, asset impairment charges, and lease cancellation costs, as described above in “Cost Reduction Actions.” Refer also to Note 10, “Cost Reduction Actions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
 
In 2009, other items included in “Other expense, net” included:
  o  Legal settlement costs ($41 million)
  o  A loss from debt extinguishment ($21.2 million)
For more information regarding the debt extinguishment, refer to “Financial Condition” in this report and Note 4, “Debt,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For more information regarding the legal settlement costs, refer to Note 8, “Contingencies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2008, other items included in “Other expense, net” consisted of a gain on sale of investments ($4.5 million).
 
In 2007, other items included in “Other expense, net” included:
  o  Cash flow hedge loss ($4.8 million)
  o  Expenses related to a divestiture ($.3 million)
  o  Reversal of accrual related to a lawsuit ($3.2 million)
 
Net Income and Earnings per Share:
                         
(In millions, except per share amounts)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Income (loss) before taxes
  $ (790.9 )   $ 270.6     $ 375.3  
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
    (44.2 )     4.5       71.8  
 
 
Net income (loss)
  $ (746.7 )   $ 266.1     $ 303.5  
 
 
Net income (loss) per common share
  $ (7.21 )   $ 2.70     $ 3.09  
Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution
  $ (7.21 )   $ 2.70     $ 3.07  
 
 
Net income (loss) as a percent of sales
    (12.5 )%     4.0 %     4.8 %
 
 
Effective tax rate
    5.6 %     1.7 %     19.1 %
 
 

We identify your world 23


 

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
(continued)

 
(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate was approximately 6% for 2009 compared with approximately 2% for 2008. The 2009 effective tax rate is most significantly influenced by the non-cash goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges, as these expenses are largely not tax deductible, and from one-time benefits from tax planning actions, partially offset by increases to our tax reserves.
The effective tax rate was approximately 2% for 2008 compared with approximately 19% for 2007. Our 2008 effective tax rate reflects $45.3 million of benefit from changes in the valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets, favorable geographic income mix, and a $24.8 million detriment from accruals for uncertain tax positions.
Refer to Note 11, “Taxes on Income,” for more information.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY SEGMENT
 
Pressure-sensitive Materials Segment
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Net sales including intersegment sales
  $ 3,448.9     $ 3,816.2     $ 3,662.6  
Less intersegment sales
    (148.9 )     (172.4 )     (164.9 )
 
 
Net sales
  $ 3,300.0     $ 3,643.8     $ 3,497.7  
Operating income(1)
    184.7       257.2       322.3  
 
 
(1) Includes restructuring costs, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges for all years presented, and other items in 2009 and 2007
  $ 75.3     $ 12.6     $ 14.3  
 
 
 
Net Sales
Sales in our Pressure-sensitive Materials segment decreased 9% in 2009 and increased 4% in 2008.
In 2009, the decrease in reported sales reflected lower sales on an organic basis and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $186 million), partially offset by the estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter of 2009. On an organic basis, sales declined 6% in 2009 primarily due to declines in volume, partially offset by the effect of changes in pricing to offset the cumulative impact of inflation experienced in 2008.
On an organic basis, sales in our roll materials business in 2009 declined at a high single-digit rate in Europe, a mid single-digit rate (excluding intercompany sales) in North America, and a low single-digit rate in Latin America, reflecting continued weakness in end markets. These declines were partially offset by mid-single digit growth in Asia. On an organic basis, sales in our emerging markets (Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe) remained flat in 2009 compared to 2008.
On an organic basis, sales in our graphics and reflective business in 2009 declined at a mid-teen rate, reflecting lower promotional spending by businesses in response to weak market conditions.
In 2008, the increase in reported sales included a favorable impact of foreign currency translation of approximately $132 million in 2008. On an organic basis, sales grew 1% in 2008.
The organic sales growth in 2008 reflected growth in our roll materials business in Asia, Latin America and Europe, partially offset by declines in our North American roll materials businesses. On an organic basis, sales in our roll materials business in 2008 experienced high single-digit growth in Asia and low single-digit growth in Europe and Latin America. In our North American roll materials business, slow market conditions in 2008 resulted in a low single-digit decline in sales on an organic basis.
In our graphics and reflective business, sales declined on an organic basis at a mid single-digit rate in 2008, as growth in Asia and Latin America was more than offset by declines in the U.S. and Europe. The decline primarily reflected lower promotional spending on graphic products by businesses in response to weak market conditions.
 
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in 2009 reflected legal settlement costs, and higher restructuring costs, asset impairment charges, and lease cancellation costs. In addition, lower volume, the unfavorable impact of currency translation, and higher employee costs more than offset the effect of changes in pricing to offset the cumulative impact of inflation experienced in 2008, lower raw material and energy costs, and cost savings from restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives.
Decreased operating income in 2008 reflected the negative effects of raw material and other cost inflation, prior year price reductions (which more than offset the benefits of price increases in 2008), and negative product mix. In addition, operating income in 2007 included the reversal of an accrual related to a lawsuit. These negative factors were partially offset by higher volume and cost savings from restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives.
 
Retail Information Services Segment
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Net sales including intersegment sales
  $ 1,324.8     $ 1,550.8     $ 1,177.5  
Less intersegment sales
    (1.6 )     (2.1 )     (2.1 )
 
 
Net sales
  $ 1,323.2     $ 1,548.7     $ 1,175.4  
Operating income (loss)(1)(2)
    (900.4 )     11.3       (4.6 )
 
 
(1) Includes restructuring costs, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges for all years presented
  $ 51.6     $ 12.2     $ 31.3  
 
 
(2) Includes goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges in 2009 and transition costs associated with acquisition integrations in 2008 and 2007
  $ 832.0     $ 24.1     $ 43.0  
 
 
 
Net Sales
Sales in our Retail Information Services segment decreased 15% in 2009, and increased 32% in 2008.
In 2009, the decrease in reported sales reflected lower sales on an organic basis and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $46 million), partially offset by the estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter of 2009 and incremental sales from the DM Label acquisition (approximately $9 million). On an organic basis, sales declined 14% in 2009 due primarily to lower volume from continued weakness in the apparel markets in the U.S. and Europe, and tighter inventory controls by retailers and brand owners.
In 2008, the increase in reported sales reflected an estimated $450 million in sales from the Paxar and DM Label acquisitions and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $7 million). On an organic basis, sales declined 6% in 2008 reflecting continued weakness in the domestic retail apparel markets and weakness experienced in the European retail markets.

24 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

Operating Income (Loss)
Operating loss in 2009 reflected goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges and higher restructuring, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges, partially offset by reduced transition costs related to acquisition integrations in 2009. In addition, incremental savings from integration actions and the benefit of restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives were more than offset by lower volume, changes in pricing, and higher employee costs.
Increased operating income in 2008 reflected higher sales, lower restructuring, asset impairment and lease cancellation charges, incremental synergies and lower transition costs related to the Paxar integration, and savings from restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives, partially offset by raw material and other cost inflation, and incremental amortization of acquisition intangibles.
 
Office and Consumer Products Segment
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Net sales including intersegment sales
  $ 850.0     $ 937.0     $ 1,017.8  
Less intersegment sales
    (.7 )     (1.2 )     (1.6 )
 
 
Net sales
  $ 849.3     $ 935.8     $ 1,016.2  
Operating income(1)
    118.1       145.7       174.6  
 
 
(1) Includes restructuring costs for all years, asset impairment charges in 2009 and 2008, lease cancellation costs and other items in 2007
  $ 14.0     $ 12.7     $ 4.8  
 
 
 
Net Sales
Sales in our Office and Consumer Products segment decreased 9% in 2009 and 8% in 2008.
In 2009, the decrease in reported sales reflected lower sales on an organic basis and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $22 million), partially offset by the estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter of 2009. On an organic basis, sales declined 8% in 2009 due primarily to lower volume from weak end market demand led by slower corporate purchasing activity, partially offset by strong back-to-school sales and the effect of changes in pricing to offset the cumulative impact of inflation experienced in 2008.
In 2008, the decrease in reported sales reflected lower sales on an organic basis, partially offset by the favorable impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $12 million). On an organic basis, sales declined approximately 9% in 2008 due primarily to a combination of weak end market demand and tighter inventory controls by customers.
 
Operating Income
Decreased operating income in 2009 reflected the impact of lower volume, higher employee costs, and increased marketing and product development spending, partially offset by cost savings from restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives and the effect of changes in pricing to offset the cumulative impact of inflation experienced in 2008.
Decreased operating income in 2008 reflected lower sales and cost inflation, partially offset by price increases and savings from restructuring actions and other productivity improvement initiatives.
Restructuring costs were incurred in all three years and asset impairment charges were incurred in 2009 and 2008. Operating income in 2007 included lease cancellation costs and expense related to a divestiture.
 
Other specialty converting businesses
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Net sales including intersegment sales
  $ 496.4     $ 608.5     $ 638.4  
Less intersegment sales
    (16.2 )     (26.4 )     (19.9 )
 
 
Net sales
  $ 480.2     $ 582.1     $ 618.5  
Operating income (loss)(1)
    (42.7 )     7.4       27.7  
 
 
(1) Includes restructuring and asset impairment charges for all years presented
  $ 29.2     $ 3.2     $ 4.2  
 
 
 
Net Sales
Sales in our other specialty converting businesses decreased 18% in 2009 and 6% in 2008.
In 2009, the decrease in reported sales reflected lower sales on an organic basis and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $15 million), partially offset by the estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter of 2009. On an organic basis, sales declined 16% in 2009, primarily reflecting lower volume in products sold to the automotive, housing, and construction industries.
In 2008, the decrease in reported sales reflected lower sales on an organic basis, partially offset by the favorable impact of foreign currency translation (approximately $17 million). On an organic basis, sales declined 8% in 2008, reflecting lower volume in products sold to the automotive, housing, and construction industries, and the negative effect of exiting certain low-margin products in our specialty tape business, partially offset by growth in our radio-frequency identification (“RFID”) division.
 
Operating Income (Loss)
Operating loss for these businesses in 2009 reflected lower volume and higher restructuring and asset impairment charges, partially offset by the benefit of restructuring and productivity improvement initiatives.
Decreased operating income for these businesses in 2008 reflected lower sales and cost inflation, partially offset by the benefit of productivity improvement initiatives, lower restructuring and asset impairment charges, and a reduction in operating loss in our RFID division.

We identify your world 25


 

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
(continued)

 
FINANCIAL CONDITION
 
Liquidity
Cash Flow from Operating Activities:
 
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Net income (loss)
  $ (746.7 )   $ 266.1     $ 303.5  
Depreciation and amortization
    267.3       278.4       237.3  
Provision for doubtful accounts
    19.3       17.7       18.7  
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges
    832.0              
Asset impairment and net loss on sale and disposal of assets
    48.0       16.8       44.0  
Loss from debt extinguishment
    21.2              
Stock-based compensation
    25.8       29.0       21.6  
Other non-cash expense and loss
    22.0       11.3        
Other non-cash income and gain
    (8.7 )     (12.4 )     (1.0 )
Trade accounts receivable
    95.7       57.7       (17.7 )
Inventories
    133.3       16.5       (5.3 )
Other current assets
    40.6       (30.0 )     18.8  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    (52.4 )     (15.8 )     (87.1 )
Income taxes (deferred and accrued)
    (90.7 )     (79.9 )     (31.4 )
Other assets
    2.3       20.8       (17.1 )
Long-term retirement benefits and other liabilities
    (40.0 )     (36.5 )     15.1  
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 569.0     $ 539.7     $ 499.4  
 
 
 
For cash flow purposes, changes in assets and liabilities and other adjustments, net of the effect of business acquisitions, exclude the impact of foreign currency translation (discussed below in “Analysis of Selected Balance Sheet Accounts”).
In 2009, cash flow provided by operating activities improved compared to 2008 due to operational working capital productivity in inventory and collection of trade accounts receivables, partially offset by lower income from operations.
In 2008, cash flow provided by operating activities improved compared to 2007 due to improved collection of trade accounts receivable; extended payment terms on accounts payable; decreased purchases and better management of inventory; lower rebate payments; and lower income tax payments, net of refunds. These positive factors were partially offset by higher payments for interest and higher material costs.
 
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
 
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
  $ (72.2 )   $ (128.5 )   $ (190.5 )
Purchase of software and other deferred charges
    (30.6 )     (63.1 )     (64.3 )
Payments for acquisitions
          (131.2 )     (1,291.9 )
(Purchases) proceeds from sale of investments, net
    (.5 )     17.2        
Other
    (2.5 )     12.1       3.5  
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities
  $ (105.8 )   $ (293.5 )   $ (1,543.2 )
 
 
 
Capital and Software Spending
In 2009, we invested in various small capital projects, including projects associated with an expansion in Japan. Significant capital projects in 2008 included investments for expansion in China and India serving both our materials and retail information services businesses.
Significant information technology projects in 2009 and 2008 included customer service and standardization initiatives.
 
Payments for acquisitions
On April 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of DM Label.
On June 15, 2007, we completed the acquisition of Paxar.
Refer to Note 2, “Acquisitions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
Payments for acquisitions during 2007 also included buy-outs of minority interest shareholders associated with certain subsidiaries of RVL Packaging, Inc. and Paxar of approximately $4 million.
 
Proceeds from Sale of Investments
In 2008, net proceeds from sale of investments consist of the sale of securities primarily held by our captive insurance company.
 
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
 
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Net change in borrowings and payments of debt
  $ (300.6 )   $ (40.7 )   $ 1,259.0  
Dividends paid
    (134.9 )     (175.0 )     (171.8 )
Purchase of treasury stock
          (9.8 )     (63.2 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net
    .6       2.7       38.1  
Other
    2.2       14.3       (6.7 )
 
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
  $ (432.7 )   $ (208.5 )   $ 1,055.4  
 
 
 
Borrowings and Repayment of Debt
At year end 2009, our borrowings outstanding under foreign short-term lines of credit were approximately $60 million (weighted-average interest rate of 12.8%), compared to approximately $106 million at year end 2008 (weighted-average interest rate of 6.9%).
Short-term variable rate domestic borrowings were $415 million at January 2, 2010 (weighted-average interest rate of 0.2%), compared to $558 million at December 27, 2008 (weighted-average interest rate of 0.9%). At January 2, 2010, short-term variable rate domestic borrowings were from commercial paper issuance.
The change in outstanding commercial paper reflects positive cash flow from improved operational working capital, as well as reduced capital spending and a reduced quarterly dividend from $.41 per share to $.20 per share during the second half of the year. During 2007, we increased our short-term borrowings to initially fund the Paxar acquisition, as well as to support share repurchases.
We had medium-term notes of $50 million outstanding at both year end 2009 and 2008. In 2008, medium-term notes of $50 million were paid on maturity.
In March 2009, we completed an exchange of approximately 6.6 million of our Corporate HiMEDS units, or approximately 75.15% of the outstanding Corporate HiMEDS units. In aggregate, the exchange

26 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

resulted in the extinguishment of approximately $331 million of senior notes that are part of the Corporate HiMEDS units.
In February 2008, one of our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement for a term loan credit facility with fifteen domestic and foreign banks for a total commitment of $400 million, which we guaranteed, maturing February 8, 2011. In 2009, we reduced the outstanding balance of this term loan by approximately $60 million.
Refer to “Capital Resources” below for further information on the 2009 and 2008 borrowings and repayment of debt.
 
Dividend Payments
Our annual dividend per share decreased to $1.22 in 2009 from $1.64 in 2008. Refer to “Dividend” in the Overview and Outlook section above for further information.
 
Share Repurchases
On October 26, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase an additional 5 million shares of the Company’s stock under our existing stock repurchase program, resulting in a total authorization of approximately 7.4 million shares of the Company’s stock at that date. In 2008, we repurchased approximately .2 million shares totaling approximately $10 million. As of January 2, 2010, approximately 3.9 million shares were available for repurchase under the Board of Directors’ authorization.
 
Analysis of Selected Balance Sheet Accounts
Long-lived Assets
Goodwill decreased approximately $766 million during 2009, which reflected a non-cash impairment charge associated with our retail information services reporting unit ($820 million), partially offset by net purchase price adjustments associated with the DM Label and the Paxar acquisitions ($31 million) and the impact of foreign currency translation ($23 million).
Other intangibles resulting from business acquisitions, net decreased approximately $41 million during 2009, which reflected normal amortization expense ($33 million) and a non-cash impairment charge associated with our retail information services reporting unit ($12 million), partially offset by the impact of foreign currency translation ($3 million) and a reclassification of trade names from “Other assets” ($1 million).
Refer to Note 3, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
Other assets increased approximately $42 million during 2009, which reflected an increase in long-term pension assets ($43 million), an increase in software and other deferred charges ($41 million), an increase in third-party loan receivable ($5 million), and the impact of foreign currency translation ($3 million). These increases were partially offset by normal amortization and impairment of software and other deferred charges ($44 million), the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the exchange of the HiMEDS units, net of additional financing costs, related to the covenant amendments discussed below in “Capital Resources” ($5 million), and a reclassification of trade names to “Other intangibles resulting from business acquisitions, net” ($1 million).
 
Other Shareholders’ Equity Accounts
Our shareholders’ equity was approximately $1.36 billion at year end 2009, compared to approximately $1.75 billion at year end 2008. The decrease in our shareholders’ equity was primarily due to the non-cash impairment charges of $832 million in the first quarter of 2009, partially offset by the issuance of common stock shares associated with the extinguishment of senior notes related to the Corporate HiMEDS units, as well as the impact of foreign currency translation. Refer to Note 3, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Capital Resources” below for more information.
The value of our employee stock benefit trust decreased $4 million in 2009 due to a transfer of common shares from “Employee stock benefit trust” to “Treasury stock at cost” ($25 million) and the issuance of shares under our employee stock option and incentive plans ($15 million), partially offset by an increase in the market value of shares held in the trust ($36 million).
Accumulated other comprehensive loss decreased by $137 million during 2009 due primarily to an increase in the value of pension assets, partially offset by current year recognition and amortization of net pension transition obligation, prior service cost, and net actuarial losses in our U.S. and international pension and other postretirement plans ($29 million), change in foreign currency translation ($103 million), as well as a net gain on derivative instruments designated as cash flow and firm commitment hedges ($5 million).
 
Impact of Foreign Currency Translation:
 
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Change in net sales
  $ (269 )   $ 168     $ 232  
Change in net income
    (6 )     8       13  
 
 
 
In 2009, international operations generated approximately 66% of our net sales. Our future results are subject to changes in political and economic conditions and the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates.
The effect of currency translation on sales in 2009 primarily reflected a negative impact from sales in the currencies of Great Britain, Mexico, South Korea and Turkey, partially offset by a positive impact from sales denominated in Euros.
Translation gains and losses for operations in hyperinflationary economies, if any, are included in net income in the period incurred. Operations are treated as being in a hyperinflationary economy based on the cumulative inflation rate over the past three years. In 2009, 2008 and 2007, we had no operations in hyperinflationary economies.
 
Effect of Foreign Currency Transactions
The impact on net income from transactions denominated in foreign currencies may be mitigated because the costs of our products are generally denominated in the same currencies in which they are sold. In addition, to reduce our income and cash flow exposure to transactions in foreign currencies, we may enter into foreign exchange forward, option and swap contracts, where available and appropriate.
 
Analysis of Selected Financial Ratios
We utilize certain financial ratios to assess our financial condition and operating performance, as discussed below.

We identify your world 27


 

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
(continued)

 
Operational Working Capital Ratio
Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) as a percent of net sales decreased in 2009 primarily due to a decrease in inventories and net trade accounts receivables, partially offset by a decrease in short-term debt.
Operational working capital, as a percent of net sales, is a non-GAAP measure and is shown below. We use this non-GAAP measure as a tool to assess our working capital requirements because it excludes the impact of fluctuations due to our financing and other activities (that affect cash and cash equivalents, deferred taxes, and other current assets and other current liabilities) that tend to be disparate in amount and timing and therefore, may increase the volatility of the working capital ratio from period to period. Additionally, the items excluded from this measure are not necessarily indicative of the underlying trends of our operations and are not significantly influenced by the day-to-day activities that are managed at the operating level. Refer to “Uses and Limitations of Non-GAAP Measures.” Our objective is to minimize our investment in operational working capital as a percentage of sales by reducing this ratio to maximize cash flow and return on investment.
 
Operational Working Capital:
 
                 
(In millions)   2009     2008  
   
 
(A) Working capital deficit (current assets minus current liabilities)
  $ (134.5 )   $ (127.6 )
Reconciling items:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
    (138.1 )     (105.5 )
Current deferred and refundable income taxes and other current assets
    (199.2 )     (252.4 )
Short-term and current portion of long-term debt
    535.6       665.0  
Current deferred and payable income taxes and other current liabilities
    642.3       720.1  
 
 
(B) Operational working capital
  $ 706.1     $ 899.6  
 
 
(C) Net sales
  $ 5,850.8 (1)   $ 6,710.4  
 
 
Working capital deficit, as a percent of net sales (A) ¸ (C)
    (2.3 )%     (1.9 )%
 
 
Operational working capital, as a percent of net sales (B) ¸ (C)
    12.1 %     13.4 %
 
 
(1) Adjusted for the estimated impact of the extra week in the first quarter of 2009
 
As a percent of net sales, operational working capital in 2009 decreased compared to 2008. This measure reflects the effects of the following ratios, including the impact of foreign currency translation, and is discussed below.
 
Accounts Receivable Ratio
The average number of days sales outstanding was 59 days in 2009 compared to 61 days in 2008, calculated using a four-quarter average accounts receivable balance divided by the average daily sales for the year. The current year average number of days sales outstanding was primarily impacted by the timing of sales in relation to collections, as well as improvement in collection.
 
Inventory Ratio
Average inventory turnover was 8.4 in 2009 compared to 7.8 in 2008, calculated using the annual cost of sales divided by a four-quarter average inventory balance. The current year average inventory turnover reflected greater focus on inventory management.
 
Accounts Payable Ratio
The average number of days payable outstanding was 53 days in 2009 compared to 54 days in 2008, calculated using a four-quarter average accounts payable balance divided by the average daily cost of products sold for the year. The current year average number of days payable outstanding was primarily due to lower inventory purchases and the timing of purchases in the fourth quarter of 2009 compared to the fourth quarter of 2008, partially offset by improved payment terms with our suppliers.
 
Financial Covenants
Our various loan agreements in effect at year end require that we maintain specified financial covenant ratios on total debt and interest expense in relation to certain measures of income. As of January 2, 2010, we were in compliance with these financial covenants. The non-cash goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges recognized in the first quarter of 2009 had no adverse impact on our financial covenants. Refer to Note 4, “Debt,” and Note 3, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the financial covenant ratios and impairment charges, respectively. In January 2009, we amended the covenants included in the revolving credit agreement and term loan agreement to exclude certain restructuring charges and to adjust covenant levels. The adjusted covenant levels change quarterly and revert back to the pre-amendment levels during 2010. The amendments also reflect increased pricing levels for borrowings under both agreements, consistent with the then current pricing environment. Refer to Note 4, “Debt,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
The fair value of our debt is estimated based on the discounted amount of future cash flows using the current rates offered to us for debt of the same remaining maturities. At year end, the fair value of our total debt, including short-term borrowings, was $1.66 billion in 2009 and $1.94 billion in 2008. Fair value amounts were determined primarily based on Level 2 inputs, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable. Refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
 
Shareholders’ Equity Ratios
                         
    2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Return on average shareholders’ equity
    (55.7 )%     13.1 %     16.5 %
Return on average total capital
    (20.6 )     8.8       10.6  
 
 
 
Decreases in these ratios in 2009 compared to 2008 were primarily due to current year operating loss, partially offset by lower yearly average of total debt outstanding and shareholders’ equity. These ratios include in the numerator an actual net income (loss) and a five-quarter average of equity and total debt accounts in the denominator.

28 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

Capital Resources
Capital resources include cash flows from operations, cash and cash equivalents and debt financing. At year end 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of $138.1 million held in accounts at third-party financial institutions. To date, we have experienced no loss or lack of access to our invested cash or cash equivalents; however, there is no assurance that access to our cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.
Our $1 billion revolving credit facility, which supports our commercial paper programs in the U.S. and Europe, matures in 2012. Based upon our current outlook for our business and market conditions, we believe that this facility, in addition to the uncommitted bank lines of credit maintained in the countries in which we operate, provide the liquidity to fund our operations. During the turmoil in the financial markets, we did not experience interruptions in our access to funding.
We have $60.5 million of debt maturities due in 2010.
We are exposed to financial market risk resulting from changes in interest and foreign currency rates, and to possible liquidity and credit risks of our counterparties.
Our total debt decreased by approximately $586 million in 2009 to $1.62 billion compared to $2.21 billion at year end 2008, reflecting decreases in long-term and short-term borrowings. Refer to “Borrowings and Repayment of Debt” in the “Cash Flow from Financing Activities” above for more information.
In March 2009, we completed an exchange of approximately 6.6 million of our Corporate HiMEDS units, or approximately 75.15% of the outstanding Corporate HiMEDS units. In aggregate, the exchange resulted in the extinguishment of approximately $331 million of senior notes that are part of the Corporate HiMEDS units, the issuance of approximately 6.5 million shares of Avery Dennison’s common stock (par value $1.00 per share), and the payment of approximately $43 million in cash to participating holders who validly tendered their Corporate HiMEDS units. As a result of this exchange, we recorded a debt extinguishment loss of approximately $21 million, which included a write-off of $9.6 million related to unamortized debt issuance costs. The net proceeds from the offering completed in the fourth quarter of 2007 were approximately $427 million, which were used to reduce commercial paper borrowings initially used to finance the Paxar acquisition. As of January 2, 2010, approximately two million HiMEDS units with a carrying value of approximately $109 million remained outstanding. The purchase contracts related to these units obligate the holders to purchase from us a certain number of common shares in November 2010 (depending on the stock price at the time).
In August 2007, we amended our existing revolving credit agreement, increasing commitments from $525 million to $1 billion and extending the maturity to August 2012. Commitments were provided by twelve domestic and foreign banks. Financing available under the agreement will be used as a commercial paper back-up facility and is also available to finance other corporate requirements. In January 2009, we amended the covenants related to this issuance as described above. Refer to Note 4, “Debt,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
In September 2007, one of our subsidiaries issued $250 million 10-year senior notes, which we guaranteed, bearing interest at a rate of 6.625% per year, due October 2017. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $247 million and were used to pay down current long-term debt maturities of $150 million and reduce commercial paper borrowings of $97 million initially used to finance the Paxar acquisition.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, we filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC to permit the issuance of debt and equity securities. Proceeds from the shelf offering may be used for general corporate purposes, including repaying, redeeming or repurchasing existing debt, and for working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions. This shelf registration replaced the shelf registration statement filed in 2004.
In February 2008, one of our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement for a term loan credit facility with fifteen domestic and foreign banks for a total commitment of $400 million, which we guaranteed, maturing February 8, 2011. We used the term loan credit facility to reduce commercial paper borrowings previously issued to fund the Paxar acquisition. The term loan credit facility is subject to financial covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio, which were amended in January 2009. Refer to Note 4, “Debt,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
In February 2008, we terminated our bridge revolving credit agreement, dated June 13, 2007, with five domestic and foreign banks.
In addition, we had a 364-day revolving credit facility in which a foreign bank provided us up to Euro 30 million ($42.2 million) in borrowings through March 5, 2009. Included in the balance at December 27, 2008 was $42.2 million of debt outstanding under this agreement.
We had standby letters of credit outstanding of $52.5 million at the end of 2009. The aggregate contract amount of outstanding standby letters of credit approximated fair value.
Our uncommitted lines of credit were approximately $357 million at year end 2009. Our uncommitted lines of credit have no commitment expiration date and may be cancelled by the banks or us at any time.
Credit ratings are a significant factor in our ability to raise short-term and long-term financing. The credit ratings assigned to us also impact the interest rates paid and our access to commercial paper and other borrowings. A downgrade of our short-term credit ratings below the current “A-2” and “P2” levels would impact our ability to access the commercial paper markets. If our access to commercial paper markets is limited, our revolving credit facility and other credit facilities are available to meet our short-term funding requirements, if necessary. When determining a credit rating, the rating agencies place significant weight on our competitive position, business outlook, consistency of cash flows, debt level and liquidity, geographic dispersion and management team. We remain committed to retaining an investment grade rating.
 
Our Credit Ratings as of Year End 2009:
 
                 
    Short-term   Long-term     Outlook
 
 
Standard & Poor’s Rating Service (“S&P”)
  A-2     BBB     Stable
Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”)
  P2     Baa2     Negative
 
 

We identify your world 29


 

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
(continued)

 
Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
Contractual Obligations at End of Year 2009:
                                                         
   
    Payments Due by Period
 
(In millions)   Total     2010     2011     2012     2013     2014     Thereafter  
   
 
Short-term lines of credit
  $ 475.1     $ 475.1     $     $     $     $     $  
Long-term debt and capital leases
    1,149.2       60.5       280.2             250.0             558.5  
Interest on long-term debt(1)
    513.9       49.8       49.8       49.8       38.0       37.5       289.0  
Operating leases
    239.7       66.0       53.0       39.4       27.0       21.1       33.2  
Pension and postretirement benefit contributions
    23.9       23.9                                
 
 
Total contractual obligations
  $ 2,401.8     $ 675.3     $ 383.0     $ 89.2     $ 315.0     $ 58.6     $ 880.7  
 
 
(1) Interest on floating rate debt was estimated using the index rate in effect as of January 2, 2010.
 
We enter into operating leases primarily for office and warehouse space and equipment for electronic data processing and transportation. The terms of our leases do not impose significant restrictions or unusual obligations, except for the facility in Mentor, Ohio as noted below. The table above includes minimum annual rental commitments on operating leases having initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms of one year or more.
On September 9, 2005, we completed the lease financing for a commercial facility (the “Facility”) located in Mentor, Ohio, used primarily for the new headquarters and research center for our roll materials division. The Facility consists generally of land, buildings, equipment and office furnishings. We have leased the Facility under an operating lease arrangement, which contains a residual value guarantee of $33.4 million.
We did not include purchase obligations or open purchase orders at year end 2009 in the table of contractual obligations above, because it is impracticable for us to either obtain such information or provide a reasonable estimate due to the decentralized nature of our purchasing systems.
The table above does not reflect unrecognized tax benefit reserves of approximately $182 million, of which $16 million may become payable during 2010. The resolution of the balance, including the timing of payments, is contingent upon various unknown factors, and cannot be reasonably estimated. Refer to Note 11, “Taxes Based on Income,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on unrecognized tax benefits.
 
Legal Proceedings
We are a named defendant in purported class actions in the U.S. seeking treble damages and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices.
On April 24, 2003, Sentry Business Products, Inc. filed a purported class action on behalf of direct purchasers of label stock in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against us, UPM-Kymmene Corporation (“UPM”), Bemis Company, Inc. (“Bemis”), and certain of their subsidiaries seeking treble damages and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, with allegations including that the defendants attempted to limit competition among themselves through anticompetitive understandings. Ten similar complaints were filed in various federal district courts. In November 2003, the cases were transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and consolidated for pretrial purposes. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on February 16, 2004, which we answered on March 31, 2004. On April 14, 2004, the court separated the proceedings as to class certification and merits discovery, and limited the initial phase of discovery to the issue of the appropriateness of class certification. On January 4, 2006, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On January 20, 2006, we filed an answer to the amended complaint. On August 14, 2006, the plaintiffs moved to certify a proposed class. The court substantively granted class certification on November 19, 2007. On July 22, 2008, the court held a hearing to set a schedule for merits discovery. On May 12, 2009, we entered into a settlement agreement with plaintiffs. Without admitting liability, we agreed to pay plaintiffs $36.5 million, plus up to $.5 million related to notice and administration expenses, in two equal installments of $18.5 million, which were paid on May 27, 2009 and July 15, 2009. On June 10, 2009, the district court entered an order preliminarily approving the settlement, and on September 17, 2009, the district court issued an order of final approval and judgment, dismissing all claims against us with prejudice. We recorded an accrual of $37 million for this settlement in the first quarter of 2009.
On May 21, 2003, The Harman Press filed in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, California, a purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers of label stock against us, UPM and UPM’s subsidiary Raflatac (“Raflatac”), seeking treble damages and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, with allegations including that the defendants attempted to limit competition between themselves through anticompetitive understandings. Three similar complaints were filed in various California courts. In November 2003, on petition from the parties, the California Judicial Council ordered the cases be coordinated for pretrial purposes. The cases were assigned to a coordination trial judge in the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco on March 30, 2004. On September 30, 2004, the Harman Press amended its complaint to add Bemis’ subsidiary Morgan Adhesives Company (“MACtac”) as a defendant. On January 21, 2005, American International Distribution Corporation filed a purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Superior Court for Chittenden County, Vermont. Similar actions were filed by Richard Wrobel, on February 16, 2005, in the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas; and by Chad and Terry Muzzey, on February 16, 2005 in the District Court of Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska. On February 17, 2005, Judy Benson filed a purported multi-state class action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Circuit Court for Cocke County, Tennessee. Without admitting liability, we have agreed to pay plaintiffs $2 million to resolve all claims related to the purported state class actions in the states of Kansas, Nebraska, Tennessee and Vermont, which was paid on December 28, 2009. These settlements remain subject to court approval, and a hearing in their regard is set for March 10, 2010. We recorded $2 million in the third quarter of 2009 in respect of the settlement of these claims. We intend to defend the purported California class action vigorously.
The Board of Directors created an ad hoc committee comprised of certain independent directors to oversee the foregoing matters.

30 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

We are unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect could be adverse and material. These and other matters are reported in Note 8, “Contingencies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Environmental
As of January 2, 2010, we have been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and/or other responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) at fourteen waste disposal or waste recycling sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or proceedings concerning alleged soil and/or groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of our liability has been agreed upon. We are participating with other PRPs at such sites, and anticipate that our share of cleanup costs will be determined pursuant to remedial agreements to be entered into in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other governmental authorities.
We have accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites, including sites in which governmental agencies have designated us as a PRP, where it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, because of the uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future expense to remediate the currently identified sites and any sites that could be identified in the future for cleanup could be higher than the liability currently accrued.
The activity in 2009 and 2008 related to environmental liabilities, which includes costs associated with compliance and remediation, was as follows:
 
                 
    January 2,
    December 27,
 
(In millions)   2010     2008  
   
 
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 58.5     $ 37.8  
Purchase price adjustments related to acquisitions
    2.1       24.6  
Accruals
    1.0       .9  
Payments
    (5.1 )     (4.8 )
 
 
Balance at end of year
  $ 56.5     $ 58.5  
 
 
 
As of January 2, 2010, approximately $11 million of the total balance was classified as short-term.
These estimates could change depending on various factors, such as modification of currently planned remedial actions, changes in remediation technologies, changes in site conditions, a change in the estimated time to complete remediation, changes in laws and regulations affecting remediation requirements and other factors.
 
Asset Retirement Obligations
We have recognized a liability for the fair value of conditional asset retirement obligations based on estimates determined through present value techniques. An asset retirement is ‘conditional’ when the timing and (or) method of settlement of the retirement obligation is conditional upon a future event that may or may not be within our control. Our asset retirement obligations primarily relate to lease restoration costs. Certain potential obligations have not been included in our estimate, because the range of time over which we may settle the obligation or the method of settlement is unknown or cannot be reasonably estimated. Our estimated liability associated with asset retirement obligations was $7.9 million and $1.6 million at year end 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Product Warranty
We provide for an estimate of costs that may be incurred under our basic limited warranty at the time product revenue is recognized. These costs primarily include materials and labor associated with the service or sale of products. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of units installed or sold, historical and anticipated rate of warranty claims on those units, cost per claim to satisfy our warranty obligation and availability of insurance coverage. Because these factors are impacted by actual experience and future expectations, we assess the adequacy of the recorded warranty liability and adjust the amounts as necessary. Our product warranty liabilities were $2 million and $1.9 million at year end 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Other
In 2005, we contacted relevant authorities in the U.S. and reported the results of an internal investigation of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The transactions at issue were carried out by a small number of employees of our reflective business in China, and involved, among other things, impermissible payments or attempted impermissible payments. The payments or attempted payments and the contracts associated with them appear to have been minor in amount and of limited duration. Sales of our reflective business in China in 2005 were approximately $7 million. In addition, on or about October 10, 2008, we notified relevant authorities that we had discovered questionable payments to certain foreign customs and other regulatory officials by some employees of our acquired companies. These payments were not made for the purpose of obtaining business from any governmental entity. Corrective and disciplinary actions have been taken with respect to both internal investigations and we have taken remedial measures to comply with the provisions of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. On July 28, 2009, we entered into a settlement agreement with the SEC regarding the foregoing actions. Without admitting or denying liability, we agreed to disgorge approximately $.3 million and pay a $.2 million civil penalty. On August 10, 2009, we were advised by the U.S. Department of Justice that it has declined to take action against us in connection with the China reflective matters, which were voluntarily disclosed by us.
We and our subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits, claims, inquiries, and other regulatory and compliance matters, most of which are routine to the nature of our business. Based upon current information, we believe that the impact of the resolution of these other matters is not expected to be material, or is not estimable.
We participate in international receivable financing programs with several financial institutions whereby advances may be requested from these financial institutions. Such advances are guaranteed by us. At January 2, 2010, we had guaranteed approximately $16 million.
As of January 2, 2010, we guaranteed up to approximately $17 million of certain of our foreign subsidiaries’ obligations to their suppliers, as well as approximately $442 million of certain of our subsidiaries’ lines of credit with various financial institutions.
As of January 2, 2010, approximately two million HiMEDS units with a carrying value of approximately $109 million remained outstanding. The purchase contracts related to these units obligate the holders to purchase from us a certain number of common shares in November 2010

We identify your world 31


 

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
(continued)

(depending on the stock price at the time). Refer to “Capital Resources” above for further information.
 
USES AND LIMITATIONS OF NON-GAAP MEASURES
 
We use certain non-GAAP financial measures that exclude the impact of certain events, activities or strategic decisions. The accounting effects of these events, activities or decisions, which are included in the GAAP measures, may make it difficult to assess the underlying performance of the Company in a single period. By excluding certain accounting effects, both positive and negative (e.g. restructuring charges, asset impairments, legal settlement costs, certain effects of acquisitions and related integration costs, loss from debt extinguishment, gains on sales of assets, etc.), from certain of our GAAP measures, management believes that it is providing meaningful supplemental information to facilitate an understanding of the Company’s “core” or “underlying” operating results. These non-GAAP measures are used internally to evaluate trends in our underlying business, as well as to facilitate comparison to the results of competitors for a single period.
Limitations associated with the use of our non-GAAP measures include (1) the exclusion of foreign currency translation and the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, and the estimated impact of the extra week in fiscal year 2009 from the calculation of organic sales growth; (2) the exclusion of mandatory debt service requirements, as well as the exclusion of other uses of the cash generated by operating activities that do not directly or immediately support the underlying business (such as discretionary debt reductions, dividends, share repurchases, acquisitions, etc.) for calculation of free cash flow; and (3) the exclusion of cash and cash equivalents, short-term debt, deferred taxes, and other current assets and other current liabilities, as well as current assets and current liabilities of held-for-sale businesses, for the calculation of operational working capital. While some of the items the Company excludes from GAAP measures recur, these items tend to be disparate in amount and timing. Based upon feedback from investors and financial analysts, we believe that supplemental non-GAAP measures provide information that is useful to the assessment of the Company’s performance and operating trends.
 
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
 
From time to time, we enter into transactions in the normal course of business with related persons. We believe that such transactions are at arm’s length and for terms that would have been obtained from unaffiliated third persons.
One of our directors, Peter W. Mullin, is the chairman, chief executive officer and majority stockholder in various entities (collectively referred to as the “Mullin Companies”), which previously provided executive compensation, benefit consulting and insurance agency services. In October 2008, the above described operations of the Mullin Companies were sold to a subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc. (“Prudential”). During 2009, we paid premiums to insurance carriers for life insurance originally placed by the Mullin Companies in connection with our various employee benefit plans (however, the interests of the Mullin Companies in this insurance were sold to Prudential in October 2008). Prudential has advised us that it earned commissions from such insurance carriers in an aggregate amount of approximately $.4 million, $.6 million, and $.4 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, for the placement and renewal of this insurance, in which Mr. Mullin had an interest of approximately $.09 million, $.3 million, and $.3 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Mr. Mullin’s interest in the 2009 commissions was determined in accordance with the terms of a commission sharing agreement entered into between Mr. Mullin and Prudential at the time of the sale.
The Mullin Companies own a minority interest in M Financial Holdings, Inc. (“MFH”). Substantially all of the life insurance policies, which we originally placed through the Mullin Companies, are issued by insurance carriers that participate in reinsurance agreements entered into between these insurance carriers and M Life Insurance Company (“M Life”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFH. Reinsurance returns earned by M Life are determined annually by the insurance carriers and can be negative or positive, depending upon the results of M Life’s aggregate reinsurance pool, which consists of the insured lives reinsured by M Life. The Mullin Companies have advised that in 2009, they did not receive any distributions of net reinsurance gains (either in the form of gains subject to or without risk of forfeiture) ascribed by M Life to our life insurance policies referred to above. Such gains in 2008 and 2007 were not material.
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions for the reporting period and as of the financial statement date. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expense. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Critical accounting policies are those that are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and which require us to make difficult, subjective and/or complex judgments. Critical accounting policies cover accounting matters that are inherently uncertain because the future resolution of such matters is unknown. We believe that critical accounting policies include accounting for revenue recognition, sales returns and allowances, accounts receivable allowances, inventory and inventory reserves, long-lived asset impairments, goodwill, fair value measurements, pension and postretirement benefits, income taxes, stock-based compensation, restructuring and severance costs, litigation and environmental matters, and business combinations.
 
Revenue Recognition
Sales are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is determinable, delivery has occurred based on applicable sales terms, and collection is reasonably assured. Sales terms are generally f.o.b. (free on board) shipping point or f.o.b. destination, depending upon local business customs. For most regions in which we operate, f.o.b. shipping point terms are utilized and sales are recorded at the time of shipment, because this is when title and risk of loss are transferred. In certain regions, notably in Europe, f.o.b. destination terms are generally utilized and sales are recorded when the products are delivered to the customer’s delivery site, because this is when title and risk of loss are transferred. Furthermore, sales, provisions for estimated returns, and the cost of products sold are recorded at the time title transfers to customers and when the customers assume the risks and rewards of ownership.

32 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

Actual product returns are charged against estimated sales return allowances.
Sales rebates and discounts are common practice in the industries in which we operate. Volume, promotional, price, cash and other discounts and customer incentives are accounted for as a reduction to gross sales. Rebates and discounts are recorded based upon estimates at the time products are sold. These estimates are based upon historical experience for similar programs and products. We review such rebates and discounts on an ongoing basis and accruals for rebates and discounts are adjusted, if necessary, as additional information becomes available.
 
Sales Returns and Allowances
Sales returns and allowances represent credits we grant to our customers (both affiliated and non-affiliated) for the return of unsatisfactory product or a negotiated allowance in lieu of return. We accrue for returns and allowances based upon the gross price of the products sold and historical experience for such products. We record these allowances based on the following factors: (i) customer specific allowances; and (ii) an estimated amount, based on our historical experience, for issues not yet identified.
 
Accounts Receivable Allowances
We are required to make judgments as to the collectibility of accounts receivable based on established aging policy, historical experience and future expectations. The allowances for doubtful accounts represent allowances for customer trade accounts receivable that are estimated to be partially or entirely uncollectible. These allowances are used to reduce gross trade receivables to their net realizable value. We record these allowances based on estimates related to the following factors: (i) customer specific allowances; (ii) amounts based upon an aging schedule; and (iii) an estimated amount, based on our historical experience, for issues not yet identified. No single customer represented 10% or more of our net sales or trade receivables at year end 2009 and 2008. However, our ten largest customers at year end 2009 represented approximately 13% of trade accounts receivable, and consisted of six customers of our Office and Consumer Products segment and four customers of our Pressure-sensitive Materials segment. The financial position and operations of these customers are monitored on an ongoing basis.
 
Inventory and Inventory Reserves
Inventories are stated at the lower-of-cost-or-market value and are categorized as raw materials, work-in-progress or finished goods. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Inventory reserves are recorded for matters such as damaged, obsolete, excess and slow-moving inventory. We use estimates to record these reserves. Slow-moving inventory is reviewed by category and may be partially or fully reserved for depending on the type of product and the length of time the product has been included in inventory.
 
Long-lived Asset Impairments
We record impairment charges when the carrying amounts of long-lived assets are determined not to be recoverable. Impairment is measured by assessing the usefulness of an asset or by comparing the carrying value of an asset to its fair value. Fair value is typically determined using quoted market prices, if available, or an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. The key estimates applied when preparing cash flow projections relate to revenues, gross margins, economic life of assets, overheads, taxation and discount rates. The amount of impairment loss is calculated as the excess of the carrying value over the fair value. Changes in market conditions and management strategy have historically caused us to reassess the carrying amount of our long-lived assets.
 
Goodwill
Our reporting units for the purpose of performing the impairment tests for goodwill consist of roll materials; retail information services; office and consumer products; graphics and reflective products; industrial products; and business media. For the purpose of performing the required impairment tests, we primarily apply a present value (discounted cash flow) method to determine the fair value of the reporting units with goodwill. We perform our annual impairment test of goodwill during the fourth quarter.
Our reporting units are composed of either a discrete business or an aggregation of businesses with similar economic characteristics. Certain factors may result in the need to perform an impairment test prior to the fourth quarter, including significant underperformance of our business relative to expected operating results, significant adverse economic and industry trends, significant decline in our market capitalization for an extended period of time relative to net book value, or decision to divest an individual business within a reporting unit.
Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step is to identify if a potential impairment exists by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to have a potential impairment and the second step of the impairment is not necessary. However, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of impairment loss to recognize, if any.
The second step, if necessary, compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying amount, then goodwill is not considered impaired. However, if the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
We estimate the fair value of our reporting units, using various valuation techniques, with the primary technique being a discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various judgmental assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates. Assumptions about discount rates are based on a weighted-average cost of capital for comparable companies. Assumptions about sales, operating margins, and growth rates are based on our forecasts, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data. Assumptions are also made for varying perpetual growth rates for periods beyond the long-term business plan period.
 
Fair Value Measurements
We define fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities which are required to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and the market-based risk measurements or

We identify your world 33


 

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
(continued)

assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
We determine fair value based on a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which we use to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions to determine the best estimate of fair value.
 
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
Assumptions used in determining projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets for our pension plan and other postretirement benefit plans are evaluated by management in consultation with outside actuaries. In the event we determine that changes are warranted in the assumptions used, such as the discount rate, expected long-term rate of return, or health care costs, future pension and postretirement benefit expenses could increase or decrease. Due to changing market conditions or changes in the participant population, the actuarial assumptions we use may differ from actual results, which could have a significant impact on our pension and postretirement liability and related cost.
 
Discount Rate
We, in consultation with our actuaries, annually review and determine the discount rates to be used in connection with our postretirement obligations. The assumed discount rate for each pension plan reflects market rates for high quality corporate bonds currently available. In the U.S., our discount rate is determined by evaluating several yield curves consisting of large populations of high quality corporate bonds. The projected pension benefit payment streams are then matched with the bond portfolios to determine a rate that reflects the liability duration unique to our plans.
 
Long-term Return on Assets
We determine the long-term rate of return assumption for plan assets by reviewing the historical and expected returns of both the equity and fixed income markets, taking into consideration that assets with higher volatility typically generate a greater return over the long run. Additionally, current market conditions, such as interest rates, are evaluated and peer data is reviewed to check for reasonability and appropriateness.
 
Healthcare Cost Trend Rate
Our practice is to fund the cost of postretirement benefits on a cash basis. For measurement purposes, a 9% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2010. This rate is expected to decrease to approximately 5% by 2014.
 
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting purposes. Such amounts are adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect changes in tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Changes in tax laws or accounting standards and methods may affect recorded deferred taxes in future periods.
Income taxes have not been provided on certain undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries because such earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested.
When establishing a valuation allowance, we consider future sources of taxable income such as “future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards” and “tax planning strategies.” A tax planning strategy as “an action that: is prudent and feasible; an enterprise ordinarily might not take, but would take to prevent an operating loss or tax credit carryforward from expiring unused; and would result in realization of deferred tax assets.” In the event we determine the deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future, the valuation adjustment to the deferred tax assets will be charged to earnings in the period in which we make such a determination. We have also acquired certain net deferred tax assets with existing valuation allowances. If it is later determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized, we will release the valuation allowance to current earnings or adjust the purchase price allocation.
We calculate our current and deferred tax provision based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed in subsequent years. Adjustments based on filed returns are recorded when identified.
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. Our estimate of the potential outcome of any uncertain tax issue is subject to management’s assessment of relevant risks, facts, and circumstances existing at that time. We use a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We record a liability for the difference between the benefit recognized and measured and tax position taken or expected to be taken on our tax return. To the extent that our assessment of such tax positions changes, the change in estimate is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. We report tax-related interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense.
We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the tax related balances or valuation allowance balances. However, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may be materially different from the current estimate.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
Valuation of Stock Options
Our stock-based compensation expense is the estimated fair value of options granted, amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The fair value of each of our stock option awards is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires input assumptions for our expected dividend yield, expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and the expected option term.
Risk-free interest rate was based on the 52-week average of the Treasury-Bond rate that has a term corresponding to the expected option term.
Expected stock price volatility for options was determined based on an average of implied and historical volatility.
Expected dividend yield was based on the current annual dividend divided by the 12-month average of our monthly stock price prior to grant.
Expected option term was determined based on historical experience under our stock option plans.

34 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

Forfeiture rate assumption was determined based on historical data of our stock option forfeitures.
Certain of the assumptions used above are based on management’s estimates. As such, if factors change and such factors require us to change our assumptions and estimates, our stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different in the future.
The fair value of certain stock-based awards that are subject to performance metrics based on market conditions is determined using the Monte-Carlo simulation model, which utilizes multiple input variables, including expected volatility assumptions and other assumptions appropriate for determining fair value to estimate the probability of satisfying the market condition target stipulated in the award.
We have not capitalized costs associated with stock-based compensation.
 
Accounting for Income Taxes for Stock-based Compensation
We elected to use the short-cut method to calculate the historical pool of windfall tax benefits related to employee stock-based compensation awards. In addition, we elected to follow the tax ordering laws to determine the sequence in which deductions and net operating loss carryforwards are utilized, as well as the direct-only approach to calculating the amount of windfall or shortfall tax benefits.
 
Restructuring and Severance Costs
In the U.S., we have a severance pay plan (“Pay Plan”), which provides eligible employees with severance payments in the event of an involuntary termination due to qualifying cost reduction actions. We calculate severance pay using the severance benefit formula under the Pay Plan. Accordingly, we record provisions for such amounts and other related exit costs when they are probable and estimable. In the absence of a Pay Plan or established local practices for overseas jurisdictions, liability for severance and other employee-related costs is recognized when the liability is incurred.
 
Litigation and Environmental Matters
We are currently involved in various lawsuits, claims, inquiries and other regulatory and compliance matters, most of which are routine to the nature of our business. When it is probable that obligations have been incurred and where a range of the cost of compliance or remediation can be estimated, the best estimate within the range, or if the most likely amount cannot be determined, the low end of the range is accrued. The ultimate resolution of these claims could affect future results of operations should our exposure be materially different from our earlier estimates or should liabilities be incurred that were not previously accrued.
Environmental expenditures are generally expensed. However, environmental expenditures for newly acquired assets and those which extend or improve the economic useful life of existing assets are capitalized and amortized over the remaining asset life. During each annual reporting period, we review our estimates of costs of compliance with environmental laws related to remediation and cleanup of various sites, including sites in which governmental agencies have designated us a potentially responsible party. When it is probable that obligations have been incurred and where a range of the cost of compliance or remediation can be estimated, the best estimate within the range is accrued. When the best estimate within the range cannot be determined, the low end of the range is accrued. Potential insurance reimbursements are not offset against potential liabilities, and such liabilities are not discounted.
 
Business Combinations
We record the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquired businesses at fair value, and we make estimates and assumptions to determine such fair values.
We utilize a variety of assumptions and estimates that are believed to be reasonable in determining fair value for assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These assumptions and estimates include discounted cash flow analysis, growth rates, discount rates, current replacement cost for similar capacity for certain assets, market rate assumptions for certain obligations and certain potential costs of compliance with environmental laws related to remediation and cleanup of acquired properties. We also utilize information obtained from management of the acquired businesses and our own historical experience from previous acquisitions.
We apply significant assumptions and estimates in determining certain intangible assets resulting from the acquisitions (such as customer relationships, patents and other acquired technology, and trademarks and trade names and related applicable useful lives), property, plant and equipment, receivables, inventories, investments, tax accounts, environmental liabilities, stock option awards, lease commitments and restructuring and integration costs. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur, which may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results. As such, increases to estimates are recorded as an adjustment to goodwill during the purchase price allocation period (generally within one year of the acquisition date) and as operating expenses thereafter.
 
RECENT ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS
 
During 2009, we adopted certain accounting and financial disclosure requirements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), none of which had a significant impact on our financial results of operations and financial position. Refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
 
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
 
The matters discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Annual Report contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, which are not statements of historical fact, may contain estimates, assumptions, projections and/or expectations regarding future events, which may or may not occur. Words such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “guidance,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “objective,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “seek,” “shall,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” or variations thereof and other expressions, which refer to future events and trends, identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements, and financial or other business targets, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results, performance or achievements of the Company expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

We identify your world 35


 

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
(continued)

Certain of such risks and uncertainties are discussed in more detail in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010, and include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties relating to investment in development activities and new production facilities; fluctuations in cost and availability of raw materials; ability of the Company to achieve and sustain targeted cost reductions; ability of the Company to generate sustained productivity improvement; successful integration of acquisitions; successful implementation of new manufacturing technologies and installation of manufacturing equipment; the financial condition and inventory strategies of customers; customer and supplier concentrations; changes in customer order patterns; loss of significant contract(s) or customer(s); timely development and market acceptance of new products; fluctuations in demand affecting sales to customers; collection of receivables from customers; impact of competitive products and pricing; selling prices; business mix shift; volatility of capital and credit markets; impairment of capitalized assets, including goodwill and other intangibles; credit risks; ability of the Company to obtain adequate financing arrangements and to maintain access to capital; fluctuations in interest and tax rates; fluctuations in pension, insurance and employee benefit costs; impact of legal proceedings, including a previous government investigation into industry competitive practices, and any related proceedings or lawsuits pertaining thereto or to the subject matter thereof related to the concluded investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) (including purported class actions seeking treble damages for alleged unlawful competitive practices, which were filed after the announcement of the DOJ investigation), as well as the impact of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; changes in tax laws and regulations; changes in governmental regulations; changes in political conditions; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and other risks associated with foreign operations; worldwide and local economic conditions; impact of epidemiological events on the economy and the Company’s customers and suppliers; acts of war, terrorism, and natural disasters; and other factors.
The Company believes that the most significant risk factors that could affect its financial performance in the near-term include (1) the impact of economic conditions on underlying demand for the Company’s products and on the carrying value of its assets; (2) the impact of competitors’ actions, including pricing, expansion in key markets, and product offerings; and (3) the degree to which higher costs can be offset with productivity measures and/or passed on to customers through selling price increases, without a significant loss of volume.
The Company’s forward-looking statements represent judgment only on the dates such statements were made. By making such forward-looking statements, the Company assumes no duty to update them to reflect new, changed or unanticipated events or circumstances, other than as may be required by law.
 
MARKET-SENSITIVE INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
 
Risk Management
We are exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
Our policy is not to purchase or hold foreign currency, interest rate or commodity contracts for trading purposes.
Our objective in managing the exposure to foreign currency changes is to reduce the risk to our earnings and cash flow associated with foreign exchange rate changes. As a result, we enter into foreign exchange forward, option and swap contracts to reduce risks associated with the value of our existing foreign currency assets, liabilities, firm commitments and anticipated foreign revenues and costs, when available and appropriate. The gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset changes in the related exposures. We do not hedge our foreign currency exposure in a manner that would entirely eliminate the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates on our consolidated net income.
Our objective in managing our exposure to interest rate changes is to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. To achieve our objectives, we may periodically use interest rate contracts to manage the exposure to interest rate changes related to our borrowings.
Additionally, we enter into certain natural gas futures contracts to reduce the risks associated with anticipated domestic natural gas used in manufacturing and operations. These amounts are not material to our financial statements.
In the normal course of operations, we also face other risks that are either nonfinancial or nonquantifiable. Such risks principally include changes in economic or political conditions, other risks associated with foreign operations, commodity price risk and litigation risk, which are not represented in the analyses that follow.
 
Foreign Exchange Value-At-Risk
We use a Value-At-Risk (“VAR”) model to determine the estimated maximum potential one-day loss in earnings associated with both our foreign exchange positions and contracts. This approach assumes that market rates or prices for foreign exchange positions and contracts are normally distributed. The VAR model estimates were made assuming normal market conditions. Firm commitments, accounts receivable and accounts payable denominated in foreign currencies, which certain of these instruments are intended to hedge, were included in the model. Forecasted transactions, which certain of these instruments are intended to hedge, were excluded from the model. The VAR was estimated using a variance-covariance methodology based on historical volatility for each currency. The volatility and correlation used in the calculation were based on two-year historical data obtained from one of our domestic banks. A 95% confidence level was used for a one-day time horizon.
The VAR model is a risk analysis tool and does not purport to represent actual losses in fair value that could be incurred by us, nor does it consider the potential effect of favorable changes in market factors.
The estimated maximum potential one-day loss in earnings for our foreign exchange positions and contracts was approximately $1 million and $1.7 million at year end 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Interest Rate Sensitivity
An assumed 25 basis point move in interest rates (10% of our weighted-average interest rate on floating rate debt) affecting our variable-rate borrowings would have had an estimated $3 million effect on our 2009 earnings.
An assumed 30 basis point move in interest rates (10% of our weighted-average interest rate on floating rate debt) affecting our variable-rate borrowings would have had an estimated $4 million effect on our 2008 earnings.

36 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

                 
(Dollars in millions)   2009     2008  
   
 
Assets
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 138.1     $ 105.5  
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $56.2 and $57.3 at end of year 2009 and 2008, respectively
    918.6       988.9  
Inventories, net
    477.3       583.6  
Current deferred and refundable income taxes
    103.5       115.6  
Other current assets
    95.7       136.8  
 
 
Total current assets
    1,733.2       1,930.4  
Property, plant and equipment, net
    1,354.7       1,493.0  
Goodwill
    950.8       1,716.7  
Other intangibles resulting from business acquisitions, net
    262.2       303.6  
Non-current deferred and refundable income taxes
    236.6       168.9  
Other assets
    465.3       423.1  
 
 
    $ 5,002.8     $ 6,035.7  
 
 
                 
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
               
Current liabilities:
               
Short-term and current portion of long-term debt
  $ 535.6     $ 665.0  
Accounts payable
    689.8       672.9  
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
    223.0       205.7  
Accrued trade rebates
    115.1       122.6  
Current deferred and payable income taxes
    40.8       59.6  
Other accrued liabilities
    263.4       332.2  
 
 
Total current liabilities
    1,867.7       2,058.0  
Long-term debt
    1,088.7       1,544.8  
Long-term retirement benefits and other liabilities
    556.0       566.5  
Non-current deferred and payable income taxes
    127.8       116.4  
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 7 and 8)
               
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized — 400,000,000 shares at end of year 2009 and 2008;
issued — 124,126,624 shares at end of year 2009 and 2008; outstanding — 105,298,317 shares
and 98,366,621 shares at end of year 2009 and 2008, respectively
    124.1       124.1  
Capital in excess of par value
    722.9       642.9  
Retained earnings
    1,499.7       2,381.3  
Cost of unallocated ESOP shares
          (1.2 )
Employee stock benefit trust, 6,744,845 shares and 7,888,953 shares
at end of year 2009 and 2008, respectively
    (243.1 )     (246.9 )
Treasury stock at cost, 12,068,462 shares and 17,841,050 shares
at end of year 2009 and 2008, respectively
    (595.8 )     (867.7 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (145.2 )     (282.5 )
 
 
Total shareholders’ equity
    1,362.6       1,750.0  
 
 
    $ 5,002.8     $ 6,035.7  
 
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

We identify your world 37


 

 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

 
                         
(In millions, except per share amounts)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Net sales
  $ 5,952.7     $ 6,710.4     $ 6,307.8  
Cost of products sold
    4,366.2       4,983.4       4,585.4  
 
 
Gross profit
    1,586.5       1,727.0       1,722.4  
Marketing, general and administrative expense
    1,268.8       1,304.3       1,182.5  
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges
    832.0              
Interest expense
    85.3       115.9       105.2  
Other expense, net
    191.3       36.2       59.4  
 
 
Income (loss) before taxes
    (790.9 )     270.6       375.3  
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
    (44.2 )     4.5       71.8  
 
 
Net income (loss)
  $ (746.7 )   $ 266.1     $ 303.5  
 
 
                         
Per share amounts:
                       
Net income (loss) per common share
  $ (7.21 )   $ 2.70     $ 3.09  
 
 
Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution
  $ (7.21 )   $ 2.70     $ 3.07  
 
 
Dividends
  $ 1.22     $ 1.64     $ 1.61  
 
 
                         
Average shares outstanding:
                       
Common shares
    103.6       98.4       98.1  
Common shares, assuming dilution
    103.6       98.7       98.9  
 
 
Common shares outstanding at end of year
    105.3       98.4       98.4  
 
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

38 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 
                                                                 
                      Cost of
    Employee
          Accumulated
       
    Common
    Capital in
          unallocated
    stock
          other
       
    stock, $1
    excess of
    Retained
    ESOP
    benefit
    Treasury
    comprehensive
       
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)   par value     par value     earnings     shares     trust     stock     income (loss)     Total  
   
 
Fiscal year ended 2006
  $   124.1     $   881.5     $ 2,155.6     $      (5.7 )   $   (602.5 )   $   (806.7 )   $ (50.1 )   $ 1,696.2  
Comprehensive income:
                                                               
Net income
                    303.5                                       303.5  
Other comprehensive income:
                                                               
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                                    105.5       105.5  
Effective portion of gains or losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $(.1)
                                                    .2       .2  
Net actuarial loss, prior service cost and net transition asset, net of tax of $(10)
                                                    29.2       29.2  
                                                     
                                                     
Other comprehensive income
                                                    134.9       134.9  
                                                                 
Total comprehensive income
                                                            438.4  
Effects of change in accounting for income taxes
                    2.9                                       2.9  
Repurchase of 758,781 shares for treasury, net of shares issued
                                            (51.5 )             (51.5 )
Stock issued under option plans, including $19.3 of tax and dividends paid on stock held in stock trust
            19.3                       54.0                       73.3  
Dividends: $1.61 per share
                    (171.8 )                                     (171.8 )
ESOP transactions, net
                            1.9                               1.9  
Employee stock benefit trust market value adjustment
            (119.7 )                     119.7                        
 
 
Fiscal year ended 2007
    124.1       781.1       2,290.2       (3.8 )     (428.8 )     (858.2 )     84.8       1,989.4  
Comprehensive income:
                                                               
Net income
                    266.1                                       266.1  
Other comprehensive income (loss):
                                                               
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                                    (177.3 )     (177.3 )
Effective portion of gains or losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $(.6)
                                                    1.0       1.0  
Net actuarial loss, prior service cost and net transition asset, net of tax of $(103.5)
                                                    (191.0 )     (191.0 )
                                                     
                                                     
Other comprehensive loss
                                                    (367.3 )     (367.3 )
                                                                 
Total comprehensive loss
                                                            (101.2 )
Repurchase of 195,221 shares for treasury, net of shares issued
                                            (9.5 )             (9.5 )
Stock issued under option plans, including $13.4 of tax and dividends paid on stock held in stock trust
            36.2                       7.5                       43.7  
Dividends: $1.64 per share
                    (175.0 )                                     (175.0 )
ESOP transactions, net
                            2.6                               2.6  
Employee stock benefit trust market value adjustment
            (174.4 )                     174.4                        
 
 
Fiscal year ended 2008
    124.1       642.9       2,381.3       (1.2 )     (246.9 )     (867.7 )     (282.5 )     1,750.0  
Comprehensive income:
                                                               
Net loss
                    (746.7 )                                     (746.7 )
Other comprehensive income (loss):
                                                               
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                                    103.4       103.4  
Effective portion of gains or losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $2.9
                                                    4.8       4.8  
Net actuarial loss, prior service cost and net transition asset, net of tax of $6.2
                                                    29.1       29.1  
                                                     
                                                     
Other comprehensive income
                                                    137.3       137.3  
                                                                 
Total comprehensive loss
                                                            (609.4 )
Issuance of 6,459,088 shares for treasury in conjunction with HiMEDS conversion
            16.0                               296.9               312.9  
Employee stock benefit trust transfer of 686,500 shares to treasury
                                    25.0       (25.0 )              
Stock issued under option plans, including $8.2 of tax and dividends paid on stock held in stock trust
            28.1                       14.7                       42.8  
Dividends: $1.22 per share
                    (134.9 )                                     (134.9 )
ESOP transactions, net
                            1.2                               1.2  
Employee stock benefit trust market value adjustment
            35.9                       (35.9 )                      
 
 
Fiscal year ended 2009
  $ 124.1     $ 722.9     $ 1,499.7     $     $ (243.1 )   $ (595.8 )   $ (145.2 )   $ 1,362.6  
 
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

We identify your world 39


 

 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

 
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Operating Activities
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ (746.7 )   $ 266.1     $ 303.5  
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation
    187.6       204.6       184.1  
Amortization
    79.7       73.8       53.2  
Provision for doubtful accounts
    19.3       17.7       18.7  
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges
    832.0              
Asset impairment and net loss on sale and disposal of assets of $9.4, $6.5, and $10.9 in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively
    48.0       16.8       44.0  
Loss from debt extinguishment
    21.2              
Stock-based compensation
    25.8       29.0       21.6  
Other non-cash expense and loss
    22.0       11.3        
Other non-cash income and gain
    (8.7 )     (12.4 )     (1.0 )
Changes in assets and liabilities and other adjustments, net of the effect of business acquisitions:
                       
Trade accounts receivable
    95.7       57.7       (17.7 )
Inventories
    133.3       16.5       (5.3 )
Other current assets
    40.6       (30.0 )     18.8  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    (52.4 )     (15.8 )     (87.1 )
Taxes on income
    .3       34.3       6.1  
Deferred taxes
    (91.0 )     (114.2 )     (37.5 )
Other assets
    2.3       20.8       (17.1 )
Long-term retirement benefits and other liabilities
    (40.0 )     (36.5 )     15.1  
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    569.0       539.7       499.4  
 
 
                         
Investing Activities
                       
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
    (72.2 )     (128.5 )     (190.5 )
Purchase of software and other deferred charges
    (30.6 )     (63.1 )     (64.3 )
Payments for acquisitions
          (131.2 )     (1,291.9 )
(Purchases) proceeds from sale of investments, net
    (.5 )     17.2        
Other
    (2.5 )     12.1       3.5  
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities
    (105.8 )     (293.5 )     (1,543.2 )
 
 
                         
Financing Activities
                       
Net (decrease) increase in borrowings (maturities of 90 days or less)
    (192.3 )     (390.1 )     792.2  
Additional borrowings (maturities longer than 90 days)
          400.1       688.8  
Payments of debt (maturities longer than 90 days)
    (108.3 )     (50.7 )     (222.0 )
Dividends paid
    (134.9 )     (175.0 )     (171.8 )
Purchase of treasury stock
          (9.8 )     (63.2 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net
    .6       2.7       38.1  
Other
    2.2       14.3       (6.7 )
 
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (432.7 )     (208.5 )     1,055.4  
 
 
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash balances
    2.1       (3.7 )     1.4  
 
 
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
    32.6       34.0       13.0  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
    105.5       71.5       58.5  
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
  $ 138.1     $ 105.5     $ 71.5  
 
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

40 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 
 
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Nature of Operations
Avery Dennison Corporation (the “Company”) is an industry leader that develops innovative identification and decorative solutions for businesses and consumers worldwide. The Company’s products include pressure-sensitive labeling materials; graphics imaging media; retail apparel ticketing and branding systems; RFID inlays and tags; office products; specialty tapes; and a variety of specialized labels for automotive, industrial and durable goods applications.
 
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of majority-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts, transactions and profits are eliminated in consolidation. Investments in certain affiliates (20% to 50% ownership) are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. Investments representing less than 20% ownership are accounted for by the cost method of accounting.
 
Financial Presentation
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
 
Segment Reporting
The Company has determined that it has three reportable segments for financial reporting purposes:
  o  Pressure-sensitive Materials — manufactures and sells pressure-sensitive roll label materials, films for graphic and reflective applications, performance polymers (largely adhesives used to manufacture pressure-sensitive materials), and extruded films
  o  Retail Information Services — designs, manufactures and sells a wide variety of price marking and brand identification products, including tickets, tags and labels, and related services, supplies and equipment
  o  Office and Consumer Products — manufactures and sells a variety of office and consumer products, including labels, binders, dividers, sheet protectors, and writing instruments
 
Certain operating segments are aggregated or combined based on materiality, quantitative factors, and similar qualitative economic characteristics, including primary products, production processes, customers, and distribution methods. Operating segments that do not exceed the quantitative thresholds or are not considered for aggregation are reported in a category entitled “other specialty converting businesses,” which is comprised of several businesses that produce specialty tapes and highly engineered labels, including radio-frequency identification (“RFID”) inlays and other converted products.
In 2009, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment contributed approximately 56% of the Company’s total sales, while the Retail Information Services segment and the Office and Consumer Products segment contributed approximately 22% and 14%, respectively, of the Company’s total sales. The other specialty converting businesses contributed the remaining 8% of the Company’s total sales. International and domestic operations generated approximately 66% and 34%, respectively, of the Company’s total sales in 2009. Refer to Note 12, “Segment Information,” for further information.
 
Fiscal Year
The Company’s 2009 fiscal year consisted of a 53-week period ending January 2, 2010, with the extra week reflected in the first quarter. The Company’s 2008 and 2007 fiscal years consisted of 52-week periods ending December 27, 2008 and December 29, 2007, respectively. Normally, each fiscal year consists of 52 weeks, but every fifth or sixth fiscal year consists of 53 weeks.
 
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions for the reporting period and as of the financial statement date. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expense. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, deposits in banks, and short-term investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. The carrying value of these assets approximates fair value due to the short maturity of the instruments. Cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows:
 
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Interest, net of capitalized amounts
  $ 78.3     $ 114.6     $ 93.6  
Income taxes, net of refunds
    47.5       77.0       106.2  
 
 
 
In 2009, 2008 and 2007, non-cash activities included accruals for capital expenditures of approximately $8 million, $5 million and $14 million, respectively, due to the timing of payments. In 2009, the Company transferred approximately 687,000 common shares, totaling $25 million from “Employee stock benefit trust” to “Treasury stock at cost” related to the funding of employee benefit obligations.
 
Accounts Receivable
The Company records trade accounts receivable at the invoiced amount. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents allowances for trade accounts receivable that are estimated to be partially or entirely uncollectible. The customer complaint reserve represents estimated sales returns and allowances. These allowances are used to reduce gross trade receivables to their net realizable values. The Company records these allowances based on estimates related to the following factors:
  o  Customer-specific allowances
  o  Amounts based upon an aging schedule
  o  An estimated amount, based on the Company’s historical experience
 
No single customer represented 10% or more of the Company’s net sales or trade receivables at year end 2009 and 2008. However, the ten largest customers at year end 2009 represented approximately 13% of trade accounts receivable and consisted of six customers of the Company’s Office and Consumer Products segment and four customers of the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment. The Company does not generally require its customers to provide collateral.

We identify your world 41


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower-of-cost-or-market value and are categorized as raw materials, work-in-progress or finished goods. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Inventory reserves are recorded for matters such as damaged, obsolete, excess and slow-moving inventory. The Company uses estimates to record these reserves. Slow-moving inventory is reviewed by category and may be partially or fully reserved for depending on the type of product and the length of time the product has been included in inventory.
 
Inventories at end of year were as follows:
 
                 
(In millions)   2009     2008  
   
 
Raw materials
  $  217.9     $  256.2  
Work-in-progress
    119.6       143.4  
Finished goods
    205.2       248.6  
 
 
Inventories at lower of cost or market (approximates replacement cost)
    542.7       648.2  
Inventory reserves
    (65.4 )     (64.6 )
 
 
Inventories, net
  $ 477.3     $ 583.6  
 
 
 
Property, Plant and Equipment
Major classes of property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and were as follows:
 
                 
(In millions)   2009     2008  
   
 
Land
  $ 68.4     $ 68.4  
Buildings and improvements
    764.1       745.5  
Machinery and equipment
    2,334.8       2,301.5  
Construction-in-progress
    40.6       57.7  
 
 
Property, plant and equipment
    3,207.9       3,173.1  
Accumulated depreciation
    (1,853.2 )     (1,680.1 )
 
 
Property, plant and equipment, net
  $ 1,354.7     $ 1,493.0  
 
 
 
Depreciation is generally computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from five to forty-seven years for buildings and improvements and two to fifteen years for machinery and equipment. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the term of the associated leases. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred; renewals and betterments are capitalized. Upon the sale or retirement of assets, the accounts are relieved of the cost and the related accumulated depreciation, with any resulting gain or loss included in net income.
 
Software
The Company capitalizes internal and external software costs that are incurred during the application development stage of the software development, including costs incurred for the design, coding, installation to hardware, testing, and upgrades and enhancements that provide additional functionalities and capabilities to the software and hardware of the chosen path. Internal and external software costs during the preliminary project stage are expensed, as well as those costs during the post-implementation and/or operation stage are expensed, including internal and external training costs and maintenance costs.
Capitalized software, which is included in “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, is amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the software, ranging from two to ten years. Capitalized software costs were as follows:
 
                 
(In millions)   2009     2008  
   
 
Cost
  $ 364.0     $ 335.5  
Accumulated amortization
    (214.1 )     (188.0 )
 
 
    $ 149.9     $ 147.5  
 
 
 
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
Impairment charges are recorded when the carrying amounts of long-lived assets are determined not to be recoverable. Impairment is measured by assessing the usefulness of an asset or by comparing the carrying value of an asset to its fair value. Fair value is typically determined using quoted market prices, if available, or an estimate of future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Historically, changes in market conditions and management strategy have caused the Company to reassess the carrying amount of its long-lived assets.
 
Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions
Business combinations are accounted for by the purchase method, and the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible assets and identified intangible assets acquired is considered goodwill. As a result, the Company discloses goodwill separately from other intangible assets. Other identifiable intangibles include customer relationships, patents and other acquired technology, trade names and trademarks, and other intangibles.
The Company’s reporting units for the purpose of performing the impairment tests for goodwill consist of roll materials; retail information services; office and consumer products; graphics and reflective products; industrial products; and business media. In performing the required impairment tests, the Company primarily applies a present value (discounted cash flow) method to determine the fair value of the reporting units with goodwill. The Company performs its annual impairment test of goodwill during the fourth quarter.
Certain factors may result in the need to perform an impairment test prior to the fourth quarter, including significant underperformance of the Company’s business relative to expected operating results, significant adverse economic and industry trends, significant decline in the Company’s market capitalization for an extended period of time relative to net book value, or a decision to divest an individual business within a reporting unit.
The Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units, using various valuation techniques, with the primary technique being a discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis requires the Company to make various judgmental assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates. Assumptions about discount rates are based on a weighted-average cost of capital for comparable companies. Assumptions about sales, operating margins, and growth rates are based on the Company’s forecasts, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data. Assumptions are also made for varying perpetual growth rates for periods beyond the long-term business plan period.
Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step is to identify if a potential impairment exists by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the

42 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to have a potential impairment and the second step of the impairment is not necessary. However, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of impairment loss to recognize, if any.
The second step, if necessary, compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying amount, then goodwill is not considered impaired. However, if the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
See also Note 3, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions.”
 
Foreign Currency
Asset and liability accounts of international operations are translated into U.S. dollars at current rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the weighted-average currency rate for the fiscal year. Translation gains and losses of subsidiaries operating in hyperinflationary economies, if any, are included in net income in the period incurred. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in income in the period incurred. Gains and losses resulting from hedging the value of investments in certain international operations and from translation of balance sheet accounts are recorded directly as a component of other comprehensive income.
Transactions in foreign currencies (including receivables, payables and loans denominated in currencies other than the functional currency) decreased net income by $2.8 million in 2009, and increased net income by $16.1 million in 2008 and $1.4 million in 2007. In 2008, transactions in foreign currencies included a foreign currency net gain related to certain intercompany transactions of approximately $9 million. These results exclude the effects of translation of foreign currencies on the Company’s financial statements.
The Company had no operations in hyperinflationary economies in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007.
 
Financial Instruments
The Company enters into certain foreign exchange hedge contracts to reduce its risk from exchange rate fluctuations associated with receivables, payables, loans and firm commitments denominated in certain foreign currencies that arise primarily as a result of its operations outside the U.S. The Company enters into certain interest rate contracts to help manage its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. The Company also enters into certain natural gas and other commodity futures contracts to hedge price fluctuations for a portion of its anticipated domestic purchases. The maximum length of time in which the Company hedges its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions is generally 12 to 24 months.
On the date the Company enters into a derivative contract, it determines whether the derivative will be designated as a hedge. Those derivatives not designated as hedges are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with changes in the fair value recognized in earnings. Those derivatives designated as hedges are classified as either (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment (a “fair value” hedge); or (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows that are to be received or paid in connection with a recognized asset or liability (a “cash flow” hedge). The Company generally does not purchase or hold any foreign currency, interest rate or commodity contracts for trading purposes.
The Company assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether hedges are highly effective. If it is determined that a hedge is not highly effective, the Company prospectively discontinues hedge accounting. For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the related gains and losses is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, and the ineffective portion is reported in earnings. Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged forecasted transaction is consummated. In the event the anticipated transaction is no longer likely to occur, the Company recognizes the change in fair value of the instrument in current period earnings. Changes in fair value hedges are recognized in current period earnings. Changes in the fair value of underlying hedged items (such as recognized assets or liabilities) are also recognized in current period earnings and offset the changes in the fair value of the derivative.
In the Statement of Cash Flows, hedge transactions are classified in the same category as the item hedged, primarily in operating activities.
See also Note 5, “Financial Instruments.”
 
Fair Value Measurements
The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities which are required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which the Company would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The Company determines fair value based on a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which it uses to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions to determine the best estimate of fair value.
 
Revenue Recognition
Sales are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is determinable, delivery has occurred based on applicable sales terms, and collection is reasonably assured. Sales terms are generally f.o.b. (free on board) shipping point or f.o.b. destination, depending upon local business customs. For most regions in which the Company operates, f.o.b. shipping point terms are utilized and sales are recorded at the time of shipment, because this is when title and risk of loss are transferred. In certain regions, notably in Europe, f.o.b. destination terms are generally utilized and sales are recorded when the products are delivered to the customer’s “normal place of delivery,” because this is when title and risk of loss are transferred. Furthermore, sales, provisions for estimated returns, and the cost of products sold are recorded at the time title transfers to customers and when the customers assume the risks and rewards of ownership. Actual product returns are charged against estimated sales return allowances.

We identify your world 43


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
Sales rebates and discounts are common practice in the industries in which the Company operates. Volume, promotional, price, cash and other discounts and customer incentives are accounted for as a reduction to gross sales. Rebates and discounts are recorded based upon estimates at the time products are sold. These estimates are based upon historical experience for similar programs and products. The Company reviews such rebates and discounts on an ongoing basis and accruals for rebates and discounts are adjusted, if necessary, as additional information becomes available.
 
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs included in “Marketing, general and administrative expense” were $23.7 million in 2009, $22.6 million in 2008, and $31 million in 2007. The Company’s policy is to expense advertising costs as incurred.
 
Research and Development
Research and development costs are related to research, design and testing of new products and applications and are expensed as incurred. Research and development expense was $90.7 million in 2009, $94 million in 2008, and $95.5 million in 2007.
 
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
Assumptions used in determining projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets for the Company’s pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans are evaluated by management in consultation with outside actuaries. In the event that the Company determines that changes are warranted in the assumptions used, such as the discount rate, expected long-term rate of return, or health care costs, future pension and postretirement benefit expenses could increase or decrease. Due to changing market conditions or changes in the participant population, the actuarial assumptions that the Company uses may differ from actual results, which could have a significant impact on the Company’s pension and postretirement liability and related cost. Refer to Note 6, “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits,” for further information on such assumptions.
 
Product Warranty
The Company provides for an estimate of costs that may be incurred under its basic limited warranty at the time product revenue is recognized. These costs primarily include materials and labor associated with the service or sale of the product. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of units installed or sold, historical and anticipated rate of warranty claims on those units, cost per claim to satisfy the Company’s warranty obligation and availability of insurance coverage. As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future expectations, the Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as necessary. The Company’s liability associated with product warranty was $2 million and $1.9 million at year end 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s stock-based compensation expense is the estimated fair value of options granted, amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The fair value of the Company’s stock option awards is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires input assumptions for the Company’s expected dividend yield, expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and the expected option term.
The fair value of certain stock-based awards that are subject to performance metrics based on market conditions is determined using the Monte-Carlo simulation model, which utilizes multiple input variables, including expected volatility assumptions and other assumptions to estimate the probability of satisfying the market condition target stipulated in the award.
The Company uses the short-cut method to calculate the historical pool of windfall tax benefits related to employee stock-based compensation awards. In addition, the Company elected to follow the tax ordering laws to determine the sequence in which deductions and net operating loss carryforwards are utilized, as well as the direct-only approach to calculating the amount of windfall or shortfall tax benefits.
See also Note 9, “Shareholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation.”
 
Environmental Expenditures
Environmental expenditures are generally expensed. However, environmental expenditures for newly acquired assets and those which extend or improve the economic useful life of existing assets are capitalized and amortized over the remaining asset life. During each annual reporting period, the Company reviews its estimates of costs of compliance with environmental laws related to remediation and cleanup of various sites, including sites in which governmental agencies have designated the Company as a potentially responsible party. When it is probable that obligations have been incurred and where a range of the cost of compliance or remediation can be estimated, the best estimate within the range is accrued. When the best estimate within the range cannot be determined, the low end of the range is accrued. Potential insurance reimbursements are not offset against potential liabilities, and such liabilities are not discounted. Refer to Note 8, “Contingencies,” for further information.
 
Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company recognizes a liability for the fair value of conditional asset retirement obligations based on estimates determined through present value techniques. An asset retirement is ‘conditional’ when the timing and (or) method of settlement of the retirement obligation is conditional upon a future event that may or may not be within the control of the Company. The Company’s asset retirement obligations primarily relate to lease restoration costs. Certain potential obligations have not been included in the Company’s estimate, because the range of time over which the Company may settle the obligation or the method of settlement is unknown or cannot be reasonably estimated. The Company’s estimated liability associated with asset retirement obligations was $7.9 million and $1.6 million at year end 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Restructuring and Severance Costs
In the U.S., the Company has a severance pay plan (“Pay Plan”), which provides eligible employees with severance payments in the event of an involuntary termination due to qualifying cost reduction actions. Severance pay is calculated by using a severance benefit formula under the Pay Plan. Accordingly, the provisions for such amounts and other related exit costs are recorded when they are probable and estimable. In the absence of a Pay Plan or established local practices for overseas jurisdictions, liability for

44 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
severance and other employee-related costs is recognized when the liability is incurred. See also Note 10, “Cost Reduction Actions.”
 
Taxes on Income
Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting purposes. Such amounts are adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect changes in tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the Company’s deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
When establishing a valuation allowance, the Company considers future sources of taxable income such as “future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards” and “tax planning strategies.” A tax planning strategy is defined as “an action that: is prudent and feasible; an enterprise ordinarily might not take, but would take to prevent an operating loss or tax credit carryforward from expiring unused; and would result in realization of deferred tax assets.” In the event the Company determines that the deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future, the valuation adjustment to the deferred tax assets is charged to earnings in the period in which the Company makes such a determination. The Company has also acquired certain net deferred tax assets with existing valuation allowances. If it is later determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized, the Company will release the valuation allowance to current earnings or adjust the purchase price allocation.
The Company calculates its current and deferred tax provision based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed in subsequent years. Adjustments based on filed returns are recorded when identified.
The amount of income taxes the Company pays is subject to ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. The Company’s estimate of the potential outcome of any uncertain tax issue is subject to management’s assessment of relevant risks, facts, and circumstances existing at that time. The Company applies a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company records a liability for the difference between the benefit recognized and measured and the tax position taken or expected to be taken on the tax return. To the extent that the Company’s assessment of such tax positions changes, the change in estimate is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. The Company reports tax-related interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense.
Investment tax credits are accounted for in the period earned in accordance with the flow-through method.
At the beginning of the first quarter of 2007 (December 31, 2006), the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for income taxes and recognized a decrease of $2.9 million in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as an increase to the beginning balance of retained earnings.
See also Note 11, “Taxes Based on Income.”
 
Net Income Per Share
 
Net income per common share amounts were computed as follows:
 
                             
(In millions, except per share amounts)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
(A)
 
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
  $ (746.7 )   $ 266.1     $ 303.5  
 
 
(B)
 
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
    103.6       98.4       98.1  
   
Dilutive shares (additional common shares issuable under employee stock options, performance units, restricted stock units and restricted stock)
          .3       .8  
 
 
(C)
 
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, assuming dilution
    103.6       98.7       98.9  
 
 
Net income (loss) per common share (A) ¸ (B)
  $ (7.21 )   $ 2.70     $ 3.09  
 
 
Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution (A) ¸ (C)
  $ (7.21 )   $ 2.70     $ 3.07  
 
 
 
In 2009, the effect of dilutive securities (for example, employee stock options, performance units (“PUs”), restricted stock units (” RSUs”) and shares of restricted stock) was not dilutive because the Company generated a net operating loss. Employee stock options, PUs, RSUs and shares of restricted stock excluded from the computation totaled approximately 11 million shares in 2009.
In 2008 and 2007, certain employee stock options, PUs, RSUs and shares of restricted stock were not included in the computation of net income per common share, assuming dilution, because they would not have had a dilutive effect. Employee stock options, PUs, RSUs and shares of restricted stock excluded from the computation totaled approximately 10 million shares in 2008 and 4 million shares in 2007.
As further discussed in the “Recent Accounting Requirements” section below, effective at the beginning of 2009, the Company adopted additional guidance regarding the calculation of earnings per share. This did not have a material impact on net income (loss) per share.
 
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss), foreign currency translation adjustment, net actuarial loss, prior service cost and net transition assets, net of tax, and the gains or losses on the effective portion of cash flow and firm commitment hedges, net of tax, that are currently presented as a component of shareholders’ equity.

We identify your world 45


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss (net of tax, with the exception of the foreign currency translation adjustment), at end of year were as follows:
 
                 
(In millions)   2009     2008  
   
 
Foreign currency translation adjustment
  $ 169.2     $ 65.8  
Net actuarial loss, prior service cost and net transition assets, less amortization, net of tax benefits of $146.7 and $155.1 at year end 2009 and 2008, respectively
    (303.4 )     (332.5 )
Net loss on derivative instruments designated as cash flow and firm commitment hedges, net of tax benefits of $6.6 and $9.5 at year end 2009 and 2008, respectively
    (11.0 )     (15.8 )
 
 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
  $ (145.2 )   $ (282.5 )
 
 
 
Cash flow and firm commitment hedging instrument activities in other comprehensive loss, net of tax, were as follows:
 
                 
(In millions)   2009     2008  
   
 
Beginning accumulated derivative loss
  $ (15.8 )   $ (16.8 )
Net loss (gain) reclassified to earnings
    15.2       (2.9 )
Net change in the revaluation of hedging transactions
    (10.4 )     3.9  
 
 
Ending accumulated derivative loss
  $ (11.0 )   $ (15.8 )
 
 
 
Business Combinations
The Company records the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquired businesses at fair value, and the Company makes estimates and assumptions to determine such fair values.
The Company utilizes a variety of assumptions and estimates that are believed to be reasonable in determining fair value for assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These assumptions and estimates include estimated future cash flows, growth rates, current replacement cost for similar capacity for certain assets, market rate assumptions for certain obligations and certain potential costs of compliance with environmental laws related to remediation and cleanup of acquired properties. The Company also utilizes information obtained from management of the acquired businesses and its historical experience from previous acquisitions.
The Company applies significant assumptions and estimates in determining certain intangible assets resulting from the acquisitions (such as customer relationships, patents and other acquired technology, and trademarks and trade names and related applicable useful lives), property, plant and equipment, receivables, inventories, investments, tax accounts, environmental liabilities, stock option awards, lease commitments and restructuring and integration costs. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur, which may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results. As such, decreases to fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (including cost estimates for certain obligations and liabilities) are recorded as an adjustment to goodwill indefinitely, whereas increases to the estimates are recorded as an adjustment to goodwill during the purchase price allocation period (generally within one year of the acquisition date) and as operating expenses thereafter.
 
Recent Accounting Requirements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative non-governmental U.S. GAAP. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification changed the manner in which U.S. GAAP guidance is referenced, but did not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued changes to consolidation accounting. Among other items, these changes respond to concerns about the application of certain key provisions of previous accounting standards, including those regarding the transparency of the involvement with variable interest entities. These changes are effective for calendar year companies beginning on January 1, 2010. The Company does not expect these changes to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.
The FASB issued in May 2009, and amended in February 2010, a new accounting standard on subsequent events. This standard defines what qualifies as a subsequent event — those events or transactions that occur following the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued, or are available to be issued. This standard was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this accounting standard in the second quarter of 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued changes to disclosure requirements regarding fair value of financial instruments, which require disclosure about fair value of financial instruments, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position, in interim financial information. These changes also require fair value information to be presented together with the related carrying amount and disclosure regarding the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value. These changes were effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company has included the required disclosures in Note 4, “Debt.”
The FASB issued in December 2007, and amended in April 2009, a revised accounting standard for business combinations. This standard defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. In general, this standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the fair value of all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date as the fair value measurement point; and modifies the disclosure requirements. This standard applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this standard has not had a material impact on the Company’s financial results of operations and financial condition. There have been no acquisitions since the effective date.
In December 2008, the FASB issued changes to disclosure requirements about postretirement benefit plan assets, which provides additional guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. These changes were effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. These changes increased the disclosures in the financial statements related to the assets of the Company’s pension and postretirement benefits plans. These disclosures are included in Note 6, “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits.”

46 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
In August 2008, the FASB issued additional accounting guidance regarding defensive intangible assets. This guidance clarifies that a defensive intangible asset should be accounted for as a separate unit of accounting. This applies to all intangible assets acquired, including intangible assets acquired in a business combination, in situations in which the acquirer does not intend to actively use the asset but intends to hold (lock up) the asset to prevent its competitors from obtaining access to the asset (defensive assets). This guidance was effective for intangible assets acquired on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on December 15, 2008. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s financial results of operations and financial condition because there have been no acquisitions since the effective date.
In June 2008, the FASB issued additional accounting guidance regarding the effect of share-based payments transactions on the computation of earnings per share. This guidance clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years and requires retrospective application. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial results of operations and financial condition.
In April 2008, the FASB issued changes to the method for determining the useful life of intangible assets. These changes modified factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used for purposes of determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. These changes were intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset for purposes of determining impairment and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset in a business combination and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These changes were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of these changes did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial results of operations and financial condition.
In March 2008, the FASB issued changes to disclosure requirements regarding derivative instruments and hedging activities. These changes were intended to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring enhanced disclosures of an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities and their effects on the entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. These disclosure requirements apply to all derivative instruments as well as related hedged items, bifurcated derivatives, and non-derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments. Entities with such instruments must provide more robust qualitative disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. These changes are effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. The Company has included the required disclosures in Note 5, “Financial Instruments.”
In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on non-controlling interests. This standard was effective for fiscal years and interim periods, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with earlier adoption prohibited. This standard requires the recognition of a non-controlling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the non-controlling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the statement of operations. This standard also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its non-controlling interest. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial results of operations and financial condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on fair value measurements, which was effective for fiscal years and interim periods after November 15, 2007. This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related disclosure requirements. This standard applies to all financial assets and liabilities and to all non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. This standard indicates, among other things, that a fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. This standard defines fair value based upon an exit price model. The Company applied the provisions of this standard to assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis as of the beginning of the 2009 fiscal year. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial results of operations or financial position.
 
Transactions with Related Persons
From time to time, the Company enters into transactions in the normal course of business with related persons. Management believes that such transactions are at arm’s length and for terms that would have been obtained from unaffiliated third persons.
One of the Company’s directors, Peter W. Mullin, is the chairman, chief executive officer and majority stockholder in various entities (collectively referred to as the “Mullin Companies”), which previously provided executive compensation, benefit consulting and insurance agency services. In October 2008, the above described operations of the Mullin Companies were sold to a subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc. (“Prudential”). During 2009, the Company paid premiums to insurance carriers for life insurance originally placed by the Mullin Companies in connection with various Company employee benefit plans (however, the interests of the Mullin Companies in this insurance were sold to Prudential in October 2008). Prudential has advised the Company that it earned commissions from such insurance carriers in an aggregate amount of approximately $.4 million, $.6 million, and $.4 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, for the placement and renewal of this insurance, in which Mr. Mullin had an interest of approximately $.09 million, $.3 million, and $.3 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Mr. Mullin’s interest in the 2009 commissions was determined in accordance with the terms of a commission sharing agreement entered into between Mr. Mullin and Prudential at the time of the sale.
The Mullin Companies own a minority interest in M Financial Holdings, Inc. (“MFH”). Substantially all of the life insurance policies, which the Company originally placed through the Mullin Companies, are issued by insurance carriers that participate in reinsurance agreements entered into between these insurance carriers and M Life Insurance Company (“M Life”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFH. Reinsurance returns earned by M Life are determined annually by the insurance carriers and can be negative or positive, depending upon the results of M Life’s aggregate reinsurance pool, which consists of the insured lives reinsured by M Life. The Mullin Companies have advised that in 2009, they did not receive any

We identify your world 47


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
distributions of net reinsurance gains (either in the form of gains subject to or without risk of forfeiture) ascribed by M Life to the Company’s life insurance policies referred to above. Such gains in 2008 and 2007 were not material.
 
NOTE 2. ACQUISITIONS
 
On June 15, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of Paxar Corporation (“Paxar”), a global leader in retail tag, ticketing, and branding systems. In accordance with the terms of the acquisition agreement, each outstanding share of Paxar common stock, par value $0.10, was converted into the right to receive $30.50 in cash. The total purchase price was approximately $1.33 billion for the outstanding shares of Paxar, including transaction costs of approximately $15 million. At June 15, 2007, outstanding options to purchase Paxar Common Stock, shares of Paxar restricted stock and Paxar performance share awards were converted into weight-adjusted options to purchase the Company’s common stock, shares of the Company’s restricted stock and, at the Company’s election, shares of the Company’s restricted stock or the Company’s restricted stock units, respectively. Since the date of acquisition, certain of these equity awards have vested on an accelerated basis.
The Paxar operations are included in the Company’s Retail Information Services segment. The combination of the Paxar business into the Retail Information Services segment increases the Company’s presence in the retail information and brand identification market, combines complementary strengths and broadens the range of the Company’s product and service capabilities, improves the Company’s ability to meet customer demands for product innovation and improved quality of service, and facilitates expansion into new product and geographic segments. The integration of the acquisition into the Company’s operations has resulted in significant cost synergies.
 
Employee-related Items
New employment agreements for certain key executives retained by the Company provided for approximately $8 million to be accrued over their requisite service periods, of which $5 million was recorded during 2007 and $2.8 million was recorded during 2008 in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
 
Pro Forma Results of Operations
The following table represents the unaudited pro forma results of operations for the Company as though the acquisition of Paxar had occurred at the beginning of 2007. The pro forma results include estimated interest expense associated with commercial paper borrowings to fund the acquisition; amortization of intangible assets that have been acquired; adjustment to income tax provision using the worldwide combined effective tax rates of both the Company and Paxar; elimination of intercompany sales and profit in inventory; fair value adjustments to inventory; and additional depreciation resulting from fair value amounts allocated to real and personal property over the estimated useful lives. The pro forma results of operations have been prepared based on the allocation of the purchase price. This pro forma information is for comparison purposes only, and is not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of 2007, nor is it necessarily indicative of future results.
 
             
(In millions, except per share amounts)   2007     (1)
Net sales
  $ 6,722.3      
             
Net income
    278.4      
             
Net income per common share
    2.84      
             
Net income per common share, assuming dilution
    2.81      
             
(1) The pro forma results of operations for fiscal year 2007 include the Company’s restructuring costs and other charges discussed in Note 12, “Segment Information.”
 
Prior to the acquisition, the Company sold certain roll materials products to Paxar. The Company’s net sales to Paxar prior to the acquisition were approximately $8 million during 2007.
 
Other Acquisitions
On April 1, 2008, the Company acquired DM Label Group (“DM Label”). DM Label operations are included in the Company’s Retail Information Services segment.
 
NOTE 3.  GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES RESULTING FROM BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
 
In connection with the preparation of the Company’s first quarter financial statements, the Company determined that there was a need to initiate an interim impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets “goodwill impairment.” The factors considered included both a sustained decline in the Company’s stock price and a decline in the Company’s 2009 revenue projections for the retail information services reporting unit, following lower than expected revenues in March 2009, which continued in April 2009. The peak season for the retail information services reporting unit has traditionally been March through the end of the second quarter.
The Company’s interim impairment analysis indicated that the fair value of each of the Company’s reporting units exceeded its carrying value, except for the Company’s retail information services reporting unit, which had a fair value less than its carrying value. In evaluating the fair value of the retail information services reporting unit, the Company assumed further declines in revenue for 2009 from 2008, reflecting continued and further weakness in the retail apparel market. The Company then assumed that revenues by 2012 would increase to levels comparable with 2007 (including estimated sales for Paxar and DM Label, adjusted for foreign currency translation). The Company also assumed a discount rate of 14.5% reflecting the increased uncertainty of global economic conditions in the first three months of 2009.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $832 million for the retail information services reporting unit, of which $820 million is related to goodwill and $12 million is related to indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company completed its interim goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of 2009, with no additional impairment charge recorded thereafter. Results from the Company’s annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of 2009 indicated that no impairment had occurred.
The primary factors contributing to the $832 million of non-cash impairment charges relative to the Company’s goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of 2008 were the assumed increase in the discount rate, the reduced assumptions for revenue growth through 2013, and the associated cash flow impact from these reduced projections. The change

48 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
in these factors reflected worsening economic projections and market conditions.
 
Goodwill
As part of the interim goodwill impairment test completed in the second quarter of 2009, which is discussed above, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $820 million for the retail information services reporting unit in the first quarter of 2009, with no additional impairment charge recorded thereafter. The total amount of goodwill assigned to the retail information services reporting unit prior to impairment charges was approximately $1.2 billion.
 
Changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill from operations for 2009 and 2008, by reportable segment, are as follows:
 
                                         
                      Other
       
    Pressure-
    Retail
    Office and
    specialty
       
    sensitive
    Information
    Consumer
    converting
       
(In millions)   Materials     Services     Products     businesses     Total  
   
 
Balance as of December 29, 2007
  $ 354.0     $ 1,137.7     $ 177.6     $ 14.0     $ 1,683.3  
Goodwill acquired during the period(1)
          45.1                   45.1  
Acquisition adjustments(2)
    .3       10.3                   10.6  
Transfers(3)
          10.4             (10.4 )      
Translation adjustments
    (19.9 )     8.1       (10.4 )     (.1 )     (22.3 )
 
 
Balance as of December 27, 2008
  $ 334.4     $ 1,211.6     $ 167.2     $ 3.5     $ 1,716.7  
Acquisition adjustments(4)
          30.9                   30.9  
Goodwill impairment charges
          (820.0 )                 (820.0 )
Translation adjustments
    17.0       .3       5.8       .1       23.2  
 
 
Balance as of January 2, 2010
  $ 351.4     $ 422.8     $ 173.0     $ 3.6     $ 950.8  
 
 
Goodwill Summary:
                                       
Goodwill
  $ 351.4     $ 1,242.8     $ 173.0     $ 3.6     $ 1,770.8  
Accumulated impairment losses
          (820.0 )                 (820.0 )
 
 
Balance as of January 2, 2010
  $ 351.4     $ 422.8     $ 173.0     $ 3.6     $ 950.8  
 
 
(1) Goodwill acquired during the period related to the DM Label acquisition in April 2008.
 
(2) Acquisition adjustments in 2008 consisted of opening balance sheet adjustments associated with the Paxar acquisition in June 2007.
 
(3) Related to the transfer of a business from other specialty converting businesses to Retail Information Services to align with a change in the Company’s internal reporting structure.
 
(4) Acquisition adjustments in 2009 consisted of opening balance sheet adjustments associated with the DM Label acquisition in April 2008 of $32.6 and other acquisition adjustments of $(1.7).
 
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
In connection with the acquisition of Paxar, the Company acquired approximately $30 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets, consisting of certain trade names and trademarks, which are not subject to amortization because they have an indefinite useful life. As part of the interim goodwill impairment test completed in the second quarter of 2009, which is discussed above, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charge of $12 million related to these indefinite-lived intangible assets in the first quarter of 2009, with no additional impairment charge recorded thereafter. The carrying value of these indefinite-lived intangible assets was $17.9 million and $29.5 million at January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008, respectively, which included $.1 million and $.5 million of negative currency impact, respectively.
 
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
The following table sets forth the Company’s finite-lived intangible assets resulting from business acquisitions at January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008, which continue to be amortized:
 
                                                 
          2009           2008  
         
    Gross
          Net
    Gross
          Net
 
    Carrying
    Accumulated
    Carrying
    Carrying
    Accumulated
    Carrying
 
(In millions)   Amount     Amortization     Amount     Amount     Amortization     Amount  
         
 
Customer relationships
  $ 295.0     $ 94.8     $ 200.2     $ 295.9     $ 67.4     $ 228.5  
Patents and other acquired technology
    53.6       23.5       30.1       53.6       18.8       34.8  
Trade names and trademarks(1)
    47.0       39.8       7.2       45.1       38.1       7.0  
Other intangibles
    13.9       7.1       6.8       8.8       5.0       3.8  
 
 
Total
  $ 409.5     $ 165.2     $ 244.3     $ 403.4     $ 129.3     $ 274.1  
 
 
(1) Includes a reclassification from “Other assets” of approximately $1 during fiscal year 2009.

We identify your world 49


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
 
Amortization expense on finite-lived intangible assets resulting from business acquisitions was $33.5 million for 2009, $32.8 million for 2008, and $19.9 million for 2007. The estimated amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets resulting from completed business acquisitions for each of the next five fiscal years is expected to be approximately $33 million in 2010, $33 million in 2011, $33 million in 2012, $31 million in 2013, and $28 million in 2014.
The weighted-average amortization periods from the date of acquisition for finite-lived intangible assets resulting from business acquisitions are fourteen years for customer relationships, thirteen years for patents and other acquired technology, eleven years for trade names and trademarks, seven years for other intangibles and thirteen years in total. As of January 2, 2010, the weighted-average remaining useful life of acquired finite-lived intangible assets are nine years for customer relationships, seven years for patents and other acquired technology, five years for trade names and trademarks, four years for other intangibles and eight years in total.
 
NOTE 4.  DEBT
 
At January 2, 2010, short-term variable rate borrowings were $415 million (weighted-average interest rate of 0.2%) and were from commercial paper issuance. At December 27, 2008, short-term variable rate borrowings were $558 million at December 27, 2008 (weighted-average interest rate of 0.9%), and were from a mix of commercial paper issuance and the revolving credit agreement.
The Company had $60.1 million (weighted-average interest rate of 12.8%) and $106.4 million (weighted-average interest rate of 6.9%) of borrowings outstanding under foreign short-term lines of credit at January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008, respectively. Included in the balance at December 27, 2008 was $42.2 million of debt outstanding under an agreement for a 364-day revolving credit facility in which a foreign bank provides the Company up to Euro 30 million ($42.2 million) in borrowings through March 5, 2009.
Uncommitted lines of credit were approximately $357 million at January 2, 2010. The Company’s uncommitted lines of credit have no commitment expiration date, and may be cancelled at any time by the Company or the banks.
Available short-term financing arrangements totaled approximately $882 million at January 2, 2010.
Commitment fees related to the Company’s committed lines of credit in 2009, 2008, and 2007 were $2.3 million, $.8 million, and $1 million, respectively.
Long-term debt and its respective weighted-average interest rates at January 2, 2010 consisted of the following:
 
                 
(In millions)   2009     2008  
   
 
Medium-term notes:
               
Series 1995 at 7.5% — due 2015 through 2025
  $ 50.0     $ 50.0  
Long-term notes:
               
Senior notes due 2013 at 4.9%
    250.0       250.0  
Senior notes due 2033 at 6.0%
    150.0       150.0  
Bank term loan due 2011 at a floating rate of 2.7%
    340.0       400.0  
Senior notes due 2017 at 6.6%
    249.0       249.0  
Senior notes due 2020 at 7.9%
    109.4       440.0  
Other long-term borrowings
    .8       6.3  
Less: Amount classified as current
    (60.5 )     (.5 )
 
 
Total Long-term debt
  $ 1,088.7     $ 1,544.8  
 
 
 
The Company’s medium-term notes have maturities from 2015 through 2025 and accrue interest at fixed rates.
Maturities of long-term debt during the years 2010 through 2014 are $60.5 million (classified as current), $280.2 million, $0 million, $250 million and $0 million, respectively, with $558.5 million maturing in 2015 and thereafter.
On March 10, 2009, the Company completed an exchange of approximately 6.6 million units (or 75.15%) of its HiMEDS units, stated amount $50.00 per unit (the “HiMEDS units”), in the form of Corporate HiMEDS units (the “Corporate HiMEDS units”), comprised of (i) a purchase contract obligating the holder to purchase from the Company its common stock shares, par value $1.00 per share (the “common stock”), and (ii) a 1/20 or 5.0% undivided beneficial interest in a $1,000 aggregate principal amount 5.350% senior note due November 15, 2020 (the “HiMEDS senior notes”), for 0.9756 shares of common stock and $6.50 in cash (which included the accrued and unpaid contract adjustment payments with respect to the purchase contracts and the accrued and unpaid interest with respect to the HiMEDS senior notes) for each Corporate HiMEDS unit. The Company issued approximately 6.5 million shares of its common stock and paid approximately $43 million in cash for the exchanged HiMEDS units with a carrying value of approximately $331 million. As a result of this exchange, the Company recorded a debt extinguishment loss of approximately $21 million (included in “Other expense, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations) in the first quarter of 2009, which included a write-off of $9.6 million related to unamortized debt issuance costs. These HiMEDS units were originally issued under a shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the fourth quarter of 2007. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $427 million, which were used to reduce commercial paper borrowings initially used to finance the Paxar acquisition. As of January 2, 2010, approximately two million HiMEDS units with a carrying value of approximately $109 million remained outstanding. The purchase contracts related to these units obligate the holders to purchase from the Company a certain number of common shares in November 2010 (depending on the stock price at the time).
On January 23, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to a credit agreement for a $1 billion revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”) with certain domestic and foreign banks, maturing August 10, 2012. The amendment increases the Company’s flexibility for a specified period of time under the financial covenants to which the Revolver is subject and excludes certain restructuring charges from the calculation of the financial ratios under those covenants. The amendment increases the annual interest rate of the Revolver to the annual rate of, at the Company’s option, either (i) between LIBOR plus 1.8% and LIBOR plus 3.5%, depending on the Company’s debt ratings by either Standard & Poor’s Rating Service (“S&P”) or Moody’s Investor Service (“Moody’s”), or (ii) the higher of (A) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (B) the prime rate, plus between 0.8% and 2.5%, depending on the Company’s debt ratings by either S&P or Moody’s. The amendment also provides for an increase in the facility fee payable under the Revolver to the annual rate of between 0.2% and 0.5%, depending on the Company’s debt ratings by either S&P or Moody’s. The Company previously amended the Revolver in August 2007, whereby commitments were increased from $525 million to $1 billion

50 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
and the maturity date was extended from July 2009 to August 2012. Financing available under the agreement was used as a commercial paper back-up facility and to finance other corporate requirements.
On January 23, 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into an amendment to a credit agreement for a $400 million term loan credit facility (“Credit Facility”) with certain domestic and foreign banks, maturing February 8, 2011. The subsidiary’s payment and performance under the agreement are guaranteed by the Company. Financing available under the agreement was permitted to be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes. The Company used the term loan credit facility to reduce commercial paper borrowings previously issued to fund the acquisition of Paxar. The amendment increases the Company’s flexibility for a specified period of time under the financial covenants to which the Credit Facility is subject and excludes certain restructuring charges from the calculation of the financial ratios under those covenants. The amendment also increases the annual interest rate of the Credit Facility to the annual rate of, at the subsidiary’s option, either (i) between LIBOR plus 2.0% and LIBOR plus 4.0%, depending on the Company’s debt ratings by either S&P or Moody’s, or (ii) the higher of (A) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (B) the prime rate, plus between 1.0% and 3.0%, depending on the Company’s debt ratings by either S&P or Moody’s. The amendment requires the partial repayment of the loans under the Credit Facility in $15 million quarterly installments beginning April 2009 through December 2010, and $280 million payable upon maturity.
The financial covenant ratios permitted under the above-mentioned amendments are as follows:
                                                                 
                                              Fourth
 
    First
    Second
    Third
    Fourth
    First
    Second
    Third
    Quarter
 
    Quarter
    Quarter
    Quarter
    Quarter
    Quarter
    Quarter
    Quarter
    2010 and
 
    2009     2009     2009     2009     2010     2010     2010     thereafter  
   
 
Interest Coverage Ratio (Minimum)
    2.50       2.25       2.10       2.25       2.60       3.00       3.25       3.50  
Leverage Ratio (Maximum)
    4.00       4.25       4.25       4.00       3.75       3.50       3.50       3.50  
 
 
 
As of January 2, 2010, the Company was in compliance with its financial covenants. The non-cash goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges recognized in the first quarter of 2009 had no adverse impact on the Company’s financial covenants. Refer to Note 3, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions,” for information regarding the impairments.
In February 2008, the Company terminated its bridge revolving credit agreement, dated June 13, 2007, with five domestic and foreign banks.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC to permit the issuance of debt and equity securities. Proceeds from the shelf offering may be used for general corporate purposes, including repaying, redeeming or repurchasing existing debt, and for working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions. This shelf registration replaced the shelf registration statement filed in 2004.
In September 2007, a subsidiary of the Company issued $250 million 10-year senior notes (guaranteed by the Company) bearing interest at a rate of 6.625% per year, due October 2017. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $247 million and were used to pay down current long-term debt maturities of $150 million and reduce commercial paper borrowings of $97 million initially used to finance the Paxar acquisition.
The Company’s total interest costs in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $89.5 million, $122.1 million and $111.1 million, respectively, of which $4.2 million, $6.2 million and $5.9 million, respectively, were capitalized as part of the cost of assets.
The fair value of the Company’s debt is estimated based on the discounted amount of future cash flows using the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The fair value of the Company’s total debt, including short-term borrowings, was $1.60 billion at January 2, 2010 and $1.94 billion at December 27, 2008. Fair value amounts were determined primarily based on Level 2 inputs. Refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
The Company had standby letters of credit outstanding of $52.5 million at January 2, 2010. The aggregate contract amount of outstanding standby letters of credit approximated fair value.
 
NOTE 5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
As of January 2, 2010, the U.S. dollar equivalent notional values of the Company’s outstanding commodity contracts and foreign exchange contracts were approximately $17 million and $1.1 billion, respectively.
The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position. The Company designates commodity forward contracts on forecasted purchases of commodities and foreign currency contracts on forecasted transactions as cash flow hedges and foreign currency contracts on existing balance sheet items as fair value hedges.
 
The following table provides the balances and locations of derivatives as of January 2, 2010:
 
                         
    Asset     Liability  
(In millions)   Balance Sheet Location   Fair Value     Balance Sheet Location   Fair Value  
   
 
Foreign exchange contracts
  Other current assets   $ 5.0     Other current liabilities   $ 6.5  
Commodity contracts
  Other current assets     .5     Other current liabilities     3.5  
 
 
        $ 5.5         $ 10.0  
 
 
 
Fair Value Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized in current earnings, resulting in no net material impact to income.

We identify your world 51


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
The following table provides the components of the gain (loss) recognized in income related to fair value hedging contracts. The corresponding gains or losses on the underlying hedged items approximated the net gain on these fair value hedging contracts.
 
             
(In millions)   Location of Gain (Loss) in Income   2009  
   
 
Foreign exchange contracts
  Cost of products sold   $ (2.8 )
Foreign exchange contracts
  Marketing, general and administrative expense     15.3  
 
 
        $ 12.5  
 
 
 
Cash Flow Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.
The following table provides the components of the gain (loss) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss on derivatives (effective portion) related to cash flow hedging contracts during 2009:
 
         
(In millions)   2009  
   
 
Foreign exchange contracts
  $ (7.7 )
Commodity contracts
    (2.7 )
 
 
    $ (10.4 )
 
 
 
The following table provides the components of the gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (effective portion) related to cash flow hedging contracts:
 
             
(In millions)   Location of Gain (Loss) in Income   2009  
   
 
Interest rate contracts
  Interest expense   $ (6.9 )
Foreign exchange contracts
  Cost of products sold     (2.5 )
Commodity contracts
  Cost of products sold     (5.8 )
 
 
        $ (15.2 )
 
 
 
The amount of gain or loss recognized in income related to the ineffective portion of, and the amounts excluded from, effectiveness testing for cash flow hedges and derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were not significant in 2009.
The aggregate reclassification from other comprehensive income to earnings for settlement or ineffectiveness of hedge activity was a net gain of $2.9 million and a net loss of $10.5 million during 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effect of the settlement of currency hedges included in this reclassification is offset by the currency impact of the underlying hedged activity. A net loss of approximately $6 million is expected to be reclassified from other comprehensive income to earnings within the next 12 months.
In 2007, the Company entered into certain interest rate option contracts to hedge its exposure related to interest rate increases in connection with anticipated long-term debt issuances. Such debt issuances were intended to replace short-term borrowings initially used to finance the Paxar acquisition, as well as pay down current long-term debt maturities. In connection with these transactions, the Company paid $11.5 million as option premiums, of which $4.8 million was recognized as a cash flow hedge loss in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in 2007, and $6.7 million is being amortized over the life of the related forecasted hedged transactions.
The counterparties to foreign exchange and natural gas forward, option and swap contracts consist primarily of major international financial institutions. The Company centrally monitors its positions and the financial strength of its counterparties. Therefore, although the Company may be exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties, it does not anticipate such losses. During 2009, the Company did not experience any such losses.
 
NOTE 6.  PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
 
Defined Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors a number of defined benefit plans covering eligible U.S. employees and employees in certain other countries. It is the Company’s policy to make contributions that are sufficient to meet the minimum funding requirements of applicable laws and regulations, plus additional amounts, if any, that management determines to be appropriate, to these plans. Benefits payable to employees are based primarily on years of service and employees’ pay during their employment with the Company. Certain benefits provided by one of the Company’s U.S. defined benefit plans may be paid, in part, from an employee stock ownership plan. While the Company has not expressed any intent to terminate these plans, the Company may do so at any time.
The Company’s U.S. defined benefit pension plans and early retiree medical plan were closed to employees hired after December 31, 2008. Employees who participated in these plans before December 31, 2008 continued to participate and accrue pension benefits after satisfying the eligibility requirements of these plans. In connection with these closures, the Avery Dennison Corporation Employee Savings Plan (“Savings Plan” — a 401(k) savings plan covering its U.S. employees) increased the Company’s maximum matching contribution. This enhancement is only available to employees who are not eligible to participate in the Company’s defined benefit pension plans and early retiree medical plan.
 
Plan Assets
Assets of the Company’s U.S. defined benefit pension plans are invested in a diversified portfolio that consists primarily of equity and fixed income securities. Furthermore, equity investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks, including growth, value, and both small and large capitalization stocks. The Company’s target plan asset investment allocation in the U.S. is 75% in equity securities and 25% in fixed income securities and cash, subject to periodic fluctuations in these respective asset classes. The investment objective of the plans are to maximize the total rate of return (income and appreciation) within the limits of prudent risk-taking and Section 404 of ERISA. The plans are diversified across asset classes, striving to achieve an optimal balance between risk and return and between income and capital appreciation. Because many of the pension liabilities are long-term, the investment horizon is also long term, but the investment plan must also ensure adequate near-term liquidity to meet benefit payments.
Assets of the Company’s international plans are invested in accordance with local accepted practice and include equity securities, fixed income securities, insurance contracts, real estate and cash. Asset

52 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
allocations and investments vary by country and plan. The Company’s target plan asset investment allocation for its international plans combined is 49% in equity securities, 38% in fixed income securities and cash, and 13% in insurance contracts and real estate funds, subject to periodic fluctuations in these respective asset classes.
The weighted-average asset allocations for the Company’s defined benefit pension plans at end of year 2009 and 2008, by asset category, are as follows:
 
                                 
    2009     2008  
    U.S.     Int’l     U.S.     Int’l  
   
Equity securities
    71 %     42 %     60 %     43 %
Fixed income securities and cash
    29       47       40       49  
Insurance contracts and real estate funds
          11             8  
 
 
Total
    100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value at year end 2009:
  o  Cash is valued at nominal value.
  o  Money market funds are valued at a net asset value (“NAV”).
  o  Mutual funds are valued at fair value as determined by quoted market prices, based upon the NAV of shares held by the plans at year end.
  o  Commingled/pooled funds are comprised of shares or units in commingled funds that are not publically traded and are valued at net unit value, as determined by the fund’s trustees based on the underlying securities in the trust. Real estate commingled/pooled funds are funds with a direct investment in a pool of real estate properties and are valued based on valuation of the underlying investments, which include inputs such as cost, discounted future cash flows, independent appraisals and market-based comparable data.
  o  Common stock is valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded.
  o  Real estate investment trusts are valued based on quoted prices in active markets.
  o  Bonds and debentures consist primarily of government bonds, corporate bonds, and financial debentures. Government bonds are issued directly by government-sponsored enterprises. Corporate bonds and financial debentures consist of fixed income securities issued by corporations and financial institutions. These assets are valued at average price provided by independent pricing companies.
  o  Insurance contracts are valued at book value, which approximates fair value, and is calculated using the prior year balance plus or minus investment returns and changes in cash flows.
  o  Multi-asset common trust funds are invested in equity securities, fixed income securities, cash, and real estate funds. Multi-asset common trust funds are valued at the net asset value per share multiplied by the number of shares held as of the measurement date.
 
The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the plans believe its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.
 
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the U.S. plans’ assets at fair value as of year end 2009:
 
                                 
          Fair Value Measurements Using  
          Quoted
    Significant
    Significant
 
          Prices in
    Other
    Other
 
          Active
    Observable
    Unobservable
 
          Markets
    Inputs
    Inputs
 
(In millions)   Total     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
   
 
Assets:
                               
Cash
  $ .3     $ .3     $     $      –  
Fixed income securities
                               
Money market funds
    40.5             40.5        
Commingled/pooled funds
    97.8             97.8        
 
 
Total fixed income securities
    138.3             138.3        
 
 
Equity securities
                               
Common stock
    174.9       174.9              
Mutual funds
    15.2       15.2              
Commingled/pooled funds
    137.3             137.3        
 
 
Total equity securities
    327.4       190.1       137.3        
 
 
Real estate investment trusts
    1.9       1.9              
 
 
Total U.S. plan assets at fair value
  $   467.9     $ 192.3     $ 275.6     $  
 
 
Other assets(1)
    (.2 )                        
                         
                         
Total U.S. plan assets
  $ 467.7                          
                         
                         
(1) Includes accrued receivables and pending broker settlements at year end 2009.

We identify your world 53


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
 
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the international plans’ assets at fair value as of year end 2009:
 
                                 
          Fair Value Measurements Using  
          Quoted
    Significant
    Significant
 
          Prices in
    Other
    Other
 
          Active
    Observable
    Unobservable
 
          Markets
    Inputs
    Inputs
 
(In millions)   Total     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
   
 
Assets:
                               
Cash
  $ 4.7     $ 4.7     $     $  
Fixed income securities
                               
Mutual funds
    .2       .2              
Bonds and debentures
    1.0             1.0        
Commingled/pooled funds
    179.8             179.8        
 
 
Total fixed income securities
    181.0       .2       180.8        
 
 
Equity commingled/pooled funds
    163.9             163.9        
 
 
Insurance contracts
    26.9                   26.9  
Real estate commingled/pooled funds
    18.2             18.2        
Multi-asset common trust funds
    7.0             7.0        
 
 
Total international plan assets at fair value
  $ 401.7     $ 4.9     $ 369.9     $ 26.9  
 
 
Other assets(1)
    .4                          
                         
                         
Total international plan assets
  $ 402.1                          
                         
                         
(1) Includes accrued receivables and pending broker settlements at year end 2009.
 
The following table presents a reconciliation of Level 3 assets held during the year ended January 2, 2010:
 
         
    Level 3 assets
    Insurance
(In millions)   Contracts
 
 
Beginning balance at December 27, 2008
  $             23.0  
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    .9  
Net purchases, issuances and settlements
    1.8  
Net transfers in (out) of Level 3
     
Impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
    1.2  
 
 
Ending balance at January 2, 2010
  $ 26.9  
 
 
 
Postretirement Health Benefits
The Company provides postretirement health benefits to certain U.S. retired employees up to the age of 65 under a cost-sharing arrangement, and provides supplemental Medicare benefits to certain U.S. retirees over the age of 65. The Company’s policy is to fund the cost of the postretirement benefits on a cash basis. While the Company has not expressed any intent to terminate postretirement health benefits, the Company may do so at any time.
 
Plan Assumptions
Discount Rate
The Company, in consultation with its actuaries, annually reviews and determines the discount rates to be used in connection with its postretirement obligations. The assumed discount rate for each pension plan reflects market rates for high quality corporate bonds currently available. In the U.S., the Company’s discount rate was determined by evaluating several yield curves consisting of large populations of high quality corporate bonds. The projected pension benefit payment streams were then matched with the bond portfolios to determine a rate that reflected the liability duration unique to the Company’s plans.
 
Long-term Return on Assets
The Company determines the long-term rate of return assumption for plan assets by reviewing the historical and expected returns of both the equity and fixed income markets, taking into consideration that assets with higher volatility typically generate a greater return over the long run. Additionally, current market conditions, such as interest rates, are evaluated and peer data is reviewed to check for reasonability and appropriateness.
 
Healthcare Cost Trend Rate
For measurement purposes, a 9% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2010. This rate is expected to decrease to approximately 5% by 2014.
A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
 
                 
    One-percentage-point
    One-percentage-point
 
(In millions)   increase     decrease  
   
 
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
  $             .30     $             (.27 )
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
    2.47       (2.21 )
 
 

54 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
Plan Balance Sheet Reconciliations
The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets, funded status of the plans and accumulated other comprehensive income:
 
Plan Benefit Obligations
                                                 
      U.S. Postretirement
 
    Pension Benefits     Health Benefits  
         
    2009     2008     2009
    2008
 
(In millions)   U.S.     Int’l     U.S.     Int’l              
         
 
Change in projected benefit obligation:
                                               
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
  $ 611.9     $ 449.9     $ 581.7     $ 515.7     $ 31.8     $ 29.7  
Service cost
    18.9       11.8       19.5       14.1       1.0       1.0  
Interest cost
    38.8       25.8       36.1       28.1       1.9       1.8  
Participant contribution
          4.3             4.0       1.8       1.9  
Amendments
          (.3 )           .8              
Actuarial loss (gain)
    63.2       (25.0 )     8.1       (45.7 )     5.3       2.4  
Plan transfer(1)
    2.0             1.9                    
Benefits paid
    (41.2 )     (20.1 )     (35.4 )     (18.7 )     (4.8 )     (5.0 )
Net transfer in(2)
          .3             6.5              
Pension curtailment
                      (.2 )            
Pension settlements
          (.8 )           (.8 )            
Foreign currency translation
          19.9             (53.9 )            
 
 
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
  $ 693.6     $ 465.8     $ 611.9     $ 449.9     $ 37.0     $ 31.8  
 
 
                                                 
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year
  $ 658.0     $ 439.2     $ 586.8     $ 417.7                  
                 
                 
(1) Plan transfer represents transfer from the Company’s savings plan.
 
(2) Net transfer in represents certain retirement plans assumed from DM Label in 2008.
 
Plan Assets
                                                 
                U.S. Postretirement
 
    Pension Benefits     Health Benefits    
         
    2009     2008     2009
    2008
 
(In millions)   U.S.     Int’l     U.S.     Int’l    
         
 
Change in plan assets:
                                               
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
  $ 386.6     $ 325.0     $ 601.1     $ 461.6     $     $  
Actual return on plan assets
    86.7       60.8       (184.5 )     (100.5 )            
Plan transfer(1)
    2.0             1.9                    
Employer contribution
    33.5       16.5       3.5       16.6       3.0       3.1  
Participant contribution
          4.3             4.0       1.8       1.9  
Benefits paid
    (41.1 )     (20.1 )     (35.4 )     (18.7 )     (4.8 )     (5.0 )
Net transfer in(2)
                      (.3 )            
Pension settlements
          (.8 )           (.8 )            
Adjustment(3)
          .7                          
Foreign currency translation
          15.7             (36.9 )            
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
  $ 467.7     $ 402.1     $ 386.6     $ 325.0     $     $  
 
 
(1) Plan transfer represents transfer from the Company’s savings plan.
 
(2) Net transfer in represents valuation of additional pension plans.
 
(3) Adjustment represents additional plan assets related to a German pension plan.

We identify your world 55


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
 
Funded Status
                                                 
                U.S. Postretirement
 
    Pension Benefits     Health Benefits  
         
    2009     2008     2009
    2008
 
(In millions)   U.S.     Int’l     U.S.     Int’l    
         
 
Funded status of the plans:
                                               
Noncurrent assets
  $     $ 45.7     $     $ .8     $     $  
Current liabilities
    (3.1 )     (2.4 )     (7.7 )     (2.4 )     (3.0 )     (2.7 )
Noncurrent liabilities
    (222.8 )     (107.0 )     (217.6 )     (123.3 )     (34.0 )     (29.1 )
 
 
Plan assets less than benefit obligations
  $ (225.9 )   $ (63.7 )   $ (225.3 )   $ (124.9 )   $ (37.0 )   $ (31.8 )
 
 
 
                                                                         
                                        U.S. Postretirement
 
    Pension Benefits     Health Benefits  
         
    2009     2008     2007     2009
    2008
    2007
 
    U.S.     Int’l     U.S.     Int’l     U.S.     Int’l    
         
 
Weighted-average assumptions used for determining year end obligations:
                                                                       
Discount rate
    6.00 %     5.72 %     6.60 %     5.74 %     6.55 %     5.53 %     5.50 %     6.60 %     6.30 %
Rate of increase in future compensation levels
    3.59       2.99       3.59       2.59       3.59       2.66                    
 
 
 
For U.S. and international plans combined, the projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $952.2 million and $616.9 million, respectively, at year end 2009 and $1,057.9 million and $706.9 million, respectively, at year end 2008.
For U.S. and international plans combined, the accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $897.8 million and $609.5 million, respectively, at year end 2009 and $797.4 million and $498.9 million, respectively, at year end 2008.
The amount in non-current pension assets represents the net assets of the Company’s overfunded plans, which consist of a few international plans. The amounts in current and non-current pension liabilities represent the net obligation of the Company’s underfunded plans, which consist of all U.S. and several international plans.
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”)
The pretax amounts recognized in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:
 
                                                 
                            U.S. Postretirement
 
          Pension Benefits           Health Benefits  
         
    2009     2008     2009
    2008
 
(In millions)   U.S.     Int’l     U.S.     Int’l    
         
 
Net actuarial loss (gain)
  $ 359.3     $ (1.3 )   $ 344.3     $ (1.8 )   $ 25.6     $ 21.8  
Prior service cost (credit)
    4.7       4.1       5.6       4.8       (18.5 )     (20.5 )
Net transition obligation
          78.9             133.9              
 
 
Net amount recognized in AOCI
  $ 364.0     $ 81.7     $ 349.9     $ 136.9     $ 7.1     $ 1.3  
 
 
 
The after-tax amounts and reconciliation of AOCI components as of January 2, 2010 are as follows:
 
                                                         
                            U.S. Postretirement
 
    Pension Benefits     Health Benefits  
         
    Before-Tax
    Before-Tax
                Before-
             
    Amounts
    Amounts
    Tax
    Net-of-Tax
    Tax
    Tax
    Net-of-Tax
 
(In millions)   U.S.     Int’l     Effect     Amount     Amount     Effect     Amount  
         
 
AOCI at December 27, 2008
  $ 349.9     $ 136.9     $ (155.1 )   $ 331.7     $ 1.3     $ (.5 )   $ .8  
Less: Amortization
    (11.0 )     (2.2 )     4.6       (8.6 )     .5       (.2 )     .3  
     
     
Net AOCI
    338.9       134.7       (150.5 )     323.1       1.8       (.7 )     1.1  
Net actuarial loss (gain)
    25.1       (52.7 )(1)     3.7       (23.9 )     5.3       (2.0 )     3.3  
Prior service cost (credit)
          (.3 )     .1       (.2 )                  
 
 
AOCI at January 2, 2010
  $ 364.0     $ 81.7     $ (146.7 )   $ 299.0     $ 7.1     $ (2.7 )   $ 4.4  
 
 
(1) Net of foreign currency translation loss of $6.2.

56 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
 
Plan Income Statement Reconciliations
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost:
 
                                                                         
                                        U.S. Postretirement
 
    Pension Benefits     Health Benefits  
         
    2009     2008     2007     2009
    2008
    2007
 
(In millions)   U.S.     Int’l     U.S.     Int’l     U.S.     Int’l    
         
 
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
                                                                       
Service cost
  $ 18.9     $ 11.8     $ 19.5     $ 14.1     $ 18.5     $ 14.4     $ 1.0     $ 1.0     $ 1.0  
Interest cost
    38.8       25.8       36.1       28.1       34.1       24.1       1.9       1.8       1.6  
Expected return on plan assets
    (48.6 )     (26.8 )     (50.9 )     (29.0 )     (48.9 )     (24.4 )                  
Recognized net actuarial loss
    9.3       2.1       6.0       3.6       9.6       8.0       1.5       1.5       1.3  
Amortization of prior service cost
    .8       .5       1.1       1.4       1.9       .7       (2.0 )     (2.0 )     (2.0 )
Amortization of transition obligation (asset)
          (.6 )           (.6 )           (1.1 )                  
Recognized loss (gain) on curtailment and settlement of obligation
    .9       .2             (.1 )                              
 
 
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 20.1     $ 13.0     $ 11.8     $ 17.5     $ 15.2     $ 21.7     $ 2.4     $ 2.3     $ 1.9  
 
 
 
                                                                         
                                        U.S. Postretirement
 
    Pension Benefits     Health Benefits  
    2009     2008     2007     2009
    2008
    2007
 
    U.S.     Int’l     U.S.     Int’l     U.S.     Int’l    
         
 
Weighted-average assumptions used for
determining net periodic cost:
                                                                       
Discount rate
    6.60 %     5.74 %     6.55 %     5.53 %     5.90 %     4.67 %     6.60 %     6.30 %     5.75 %
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
    8.75       6.51       8.75       6.66       8.75       6.30                    
Rate of increase in future compensation levels
    3.59       2.59       3.59       2.66       3.59       2.90                    
 
 
 
Plan Contributions
In 2010, the Company expects to contribute approximately $3.2 million (and may contribute up to an additional $25 million) to its U.S. pension plans, a minimum of $17.6 million to its international pension plans, and approximately $3.1 million to its postretirement benefit plan.
 
Future Benefit Payments
Benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are as follows:
 
                         
                U.S. Postretirement
 
    Pension Benefits     Health Benefits  
(In millions)   U.S.     Int’l        
         
 
2010
  $ 37.5     $ 19.2     $ 3.1  
2011
    38.6       18.6       3.1  
2012
    39.7       20.4       2.9  
2013
    41.0       21.1       2.9  
2014
    42.4       22.5       2.9  
2015 – 2019
    250.7       136.3       15.7  
 
 
 
Estimated Amortization Amounts in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The Company’s estimates of fiscal year 2010 amortization of amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:
 
                         
                U.S. Postretirement
 
    Pension Benefits     Health Benefits  
    2009     2009
 
(In millions)   U.S.     Int’l    
         
 
Net actuarial loss
  $ 18.2     $ 2.5     $ 2.0  
Prior service cost (credit)
    .8       .5       (2.0 )
Net transition obligation (asset)
          (.6 )      
 
 
Net amount to be recognized
  $ 19.0     $ 2.4     $  
 
 
 
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company sponsors various defined contribution plans worldwide, with the largest plan being the Savings Plan. The Company matches participant contributions to the Savings Plan based on a formula within the plan. Beginning March 2009, the Company’s match to the Savings Plan was funded by shares in the Company’s Employee Stock Benefit Trust (“ESBT”). During 2009, the Company expensed $9.2 million related to its match to participant contributions in the Company’s defined contribution plan. This amount was recorded in “Marketing, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 9, “Shareholders’ Equity and Stock-based Compensation,” for more information.
 
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)
The Savings Plan had a leveraged ESOP feature, which allowed the plan to borrow funds to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at market prices. Savings Plan expense consisted primarily of stock contributions from the ESOP to participant accounts. As of March 2009, the shares in the ESOP were fully allocated to participants.
ESOP expense is accounted for under the cost of shares allocated method. Net ESOP expense for 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $1.2 million, $1 million, and $.2 million, respectively. Company contributions to pay interest or principal on ESOP borrowings were $2.2 million, $3.7 million, and $2.4 million, in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In 2009, interest costs incurred by the ESOP and dividends on unallocated ESOP shares used for debt service were not significant. Interest costs incurred by the ESOP were $.3 million in 2008 and $.6 million in 2007. Dividends on unallocated ESOP shares used for debt service were $.4 million in 2008 and $.7 million in 2007.
The cost of shares allocated to the ESOP for 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $1.3 million, $2.8 million, and $2.1 million, respectively. Of the total

We identify your world 57


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
shares held by the ESOP at year end 2008, .8 million shares were allocated and .1 million shares were unallocated.
 
Other Retirement Plans
The Company has deferred compensation plans which permit eligible employees and directors to defer a portion of their compensation. The deferred compensation, together with certain Company contributions, earns specified and variable rates of return. As of year end 2009 and 2008, the Company had accrued $128.4 million and $131.7 million, respectively, for its obligations under these plans. These obligations are funded by corporate-owned life insurance contracts and standby letters of credit. As of year end 2009 and 2008, these obligations were secured by standby letters of credit of $24 million and $28 million, respectively. To assist in the funding of these plans, the Company has purchased corporate-owned life insurance contracts. Proceeds from the insurance policies are payable to the Company upon the death of covered participants. The cash surrender value of these policies, net of outstanding loans, included in “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, was $170 million and $165.4 million at year end 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company’s expense, which includes Company contributions and interest expense, was $7 million, $9.5 million, and $3.1 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. A portion of the interest on certain Company contributions may be forfeited by participants if employment is terminated before age 55 other than by reason of death, disability or retirement.
 
NOTE 7. COMMITMENTS
 
Minimum annual rental commitments on operating leases having initial or remaining noncancellable lease terms of one year or more are as follows:
 
         
Year   (In millions)  
   
 
2010
  $ 66.0  
2011
    53.0  
2012
    39.4  
2013
    27.0  
2014
    21.1  
2015 and thereafter
    33.2  
 
 
Total minimum lease payments
  $ 239.7  
 
 
 
Operating leases relate primarily to office and warehouse space, and equipment for electronic data processing and transportation. The terms of these leases do not impose significant restrictions or unusual obligations, except as noted below. There were no significant capital lease obligations as of January 2, 2010.
On September 9, 2005, the Company completed the lease financing for a commercial facility (the “Facility”) located in Mentor, Ohio, used primarily for the new headquarters and research center for the Company’s roll materials group. The Facility consists generally of land, buildings, equipment and office furnishings. The Company has leased the Facility under an operating lease arrangement, which contains a residual value guarantee of $33.4 million.
Rent expense for operating leases, which includes maintenance and insurance costs and property taxes, was approximately $100 million in 2009, approximately $105 million in 2008 and approximately $95 million in 2007.
 
NOTE 8. CONTINGENCIES
 
Legal Proceedings
On April 24, 2003, Sentry Business Products, Inc. filed a purported class action on behalf of direct purchasers of label stock in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the Company, UPM-Kymmene Corporation (“UPM”), Bemis Company Inc. (“Bemis”), and certain of their subsidiaries seeking treble damages and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, with allegations including that the defendants attempted to limit competition among themselves through anticompetitive understandings. Ten similar complaints were filed in various federal district courts. In November 2003, the cases were transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and consolidated for pretrial purposes. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on February 16, 2004, which the Company answered on March 31, 2004. On April 14, 2004, the court separated the proceedings as to class certification and merits discovery, and limited the initial phase of discovery to the issue of the appropriateness of class certification. On January 4, 2006, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On January 20, 2006, the Company filed an answer to the amended complaint. On August 14, 2006, the plaintiffs moved to certify a proposed class. The court substantively granted class certification on November 19, 2007. On July 22, 2008, the court held a hearing to set a schedule for merits discovery. On May 12, 2009, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with plaintiffs. Without admitting liability, the Company agreed to pay plaintiffs $36.5 million, plus up to $.5 million related to notice and administration expenses, in two equal installments of $18.5 million, which were paid on May 27, 2009 and July 15, 2009. On June 10, 2009, the district court entered an order preliminarily approving the settlement, and on September 17, 2009, the district court issued an order of final approval and judgment, dismissing all claims against the Company with prejudice. The Company recorded an accrual of $37 million for this settlement in the first quarter of 2009.
On May 21, 2003, The Harman Press filed in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, California, a purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers of label stock against the Company, UPM and UPM’s subsidiary Raflatac (“Raflatac”), seeking treble damages and other relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, with allegations including that the defendants attempted to limit competition among themselves through anticompetitive understandings. Three similar complaints were filed in various California courts. In November 2003, on petition from the parties, the California Judicial Council ordered the cases be coordinated for pretrial purposes. The cases were assigned to a coordination trial judge in the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco on March 30, 2004. On September 30, 2004, the Harman Press amended its complaint to add Bemis’ subsidiary Morgan Adhesives Company (“MACtac”) as a defendant. On January 21, 2005, American International Distribution Corporation filed a purported class action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Superior Court for Chittenden County, Vermont. Similar actions were filed by Richard Wrobel, on February 16, 2005, in the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas; and by Chad and Terry Muzzey, on February 16, 2005, in the District Court of Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska. On February 17, 2005, Judy Benson filed a purported multi-state class action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Circuit Court for Cocke County, Tennessee. Without admitting liability, the Company has agreed to pay plaintiffs $2 million to resolve all claims related to the purported state class actions in the states of Kansas, Nebraska, Tennessee and Vermont, which

58 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
was paid on December 28, 2009. These settlements remain subject to court approval, and a hearing in their regard is set for March 10, 2010. The Company recorded $2 million in the third quarter of 2009 in respect of the settlement of these claims. The Company intends to defend the purported California class action vigorously.
The Board of Directors created an ad hoc committee comprised of certain independent directors to oversee the foregoing matters.
The Company is unable to predict the effect of these matters at this time, although the effect could be adverse and material.
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in claims, inquiries, and other regulatory and compliance matters, most of which are routine to the nature of the business. Based upon current information, management believes that the impact of the resolution of these other matters is not material to the Company’s financial position, or is not estimable.
 
Environmental Matters
As of January 2, 2010, the Company has been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and/or other responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) at fourteen waste disposal or waste recycling sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or proceedings concerning alleged soil and/or groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of the Company’s liability has been agreed. The Company is participating with other PRPs at such sites, and anticipates that its share of cleanup costs will be determined pursuant to remedial agreements entered into in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other governmental authorities.
The Company has accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites, including sites in which governmental agencies have designated the Company as a PRP, where it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. However, because of the uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future expense to remediate the currently identified sites and any sites that could be identified in the future for cleanup could be higher than the liability currently accrued.
The activity in 2009 and 2008 related to environmental liabilities, which includes costs associated with compliance and remediation, was as follows:
 
                 
    January 2,
    December 27,
 
(In millions)   2010     2008  
   
 
Balance at beginning of year
  $        58.5     $        37.8  
Purchase price adjustments related to acquisitions
    2.1       24.6  
Accruals
    1.0       .9  
Payments
    (5.1 )     (4.8 )
 
 
Balance at end of year
  $ 56.5     $ 58.5  
 
 
 
As of January 2, 2010, approximately $11 million of the total balance was classified as short-term.
These estimates could change depending on various factors, such as modification of currently planned remedial actions, changes in remediation technologies, changes in site conditions, a change in the estimated time to complete remediation, changes in laws and regulations affecting remediation requirements and other factors.
 
Other
In 2005, the Company contacted relevant authorities in the U.S. and reported on the results of an internal investigation of potential violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The transactions at issue were carried out by a small number of employees of the Company’s reflective business in China, and involved, among other things, impermissible payments or attempted impermissible payments. The payments or attempted payments and the contracts associated with them appear to have been minor in amount and of limited duration. Sales of the Company’s reflective business in China in 2005 were approximately $7 million. In addition, on or about October 10, 2008, the Company notified relevant authorities that it had discovered questionable payments to certain foreign customs and other regulatory officials by some employees of its acquired companies. These payments were not made for the purpose of obtaining business from any governmental entity. Corrective and disciplinary actions have been taken with respect to both internal investigations and the Company has taken remedial measures to comply with the provisions of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. On July 28, 2009, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the SEC regarding the foregoing actions. Without admitting or denying liability, the Company agreed to disgorge approximately $.3 million and pay a $.2 million civil penalty. On August 10, 2009, the Company was advised by the U.S. Department of Justice that it has declined to take action against the Company in connection with the China reflective matters, which were voluntarily disclosed by the Company.
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits, claims, inquiries, and other regulatory and compliance matters, most of which are routine to the nature of the Company’s business. Based upon current information, management believes that the impact of the resolution of these other matters is not material to the Company’s financial position, or is not estimable.
The Company participates in international receivable financing programs with several financial institutions whereby advances may be requested from these financial institutions. Such advances are guaranteed by the Company. At January 2, 2010, the Company had guaranteed approximately $16 million.
As of January 2, 2010, the Company guaranteed up to approximately $17 million of certain foreign subsidiaries’ obligations to their suppliers, as well as approximately $442 million of certain subsidiaries’ lines of credit with various financial institutions.
As of January 2, 2010, approximately two million HiMEDS units with a carrying value of approximately $109 million remained outstanding. The purchase contracts related to these units obligate the holders to purchase from the Company a certain number of common shares in November 2010 (depending on the stock price at the time). Refer to Note 4, “Debt,” for more information.
 
NOTE 9. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
 
Common Stock and Common Stock Repurchase Program
The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation authorizes five million shares of $1 par value preferred stock (none outstanding), with respect to which the Board of Directors may fix the series and terms of issuance, and 400 million shares of $1 par value voting common stock.
The Board of Directors previously authorized the issuance of up to 18 million shares to be used for the issuance of stock options and the funding of other Company obligations arising from various employee

We identify your world 59


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
benefit plans. As of January 2, 2010, the remaining shares available of approximately 7 million are held in the ESBT. The ESBT common stock is carried at market value with changes in share price from prior reporting periods reflected as an adjustment to capital in excess of par value.
On October 26, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional 5 million shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, resulting in a total authorization of approximately 7.4 million shares at that date. The repurchased shares may be reissued under the Company’s stock option and incentive plans or used for other corporate purposes. At January 2, 2010, approximately 3.9 million shares were available for repurchase under the Board of Directors’ authorization.
 
Stock Option and Incentive Plans
The Company maintains various stock option and incentive plans. Under these plans, stock options granted to directors and employees may be granted at no less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. Options generally vest ratably over a two-year period for directors and over a four-year period for employees. Unexercised options expire ten years from the date of grant. All stock options granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
The Company’s stock-based compensation expense is the estimated fair value of options granted, amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The fair value of the Company’s stock option awards is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires input assumptions for the Company’s expected dividend yield, expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and the expected option term. The following describes the assumptions used in estimating fair value of granted stock-options.
Risk-free interest rate was based on the 52-week average of the Treasury-Bond rate that has a term corresponding to the expected option term.
Expected stock price volatility for options represents an average of implied and historical volatility.
Expected dividend yield was based on the current annual dividend divided by the 12-month average of the Company’s monthly stock price prior to grant.
Expected option term was determined based on historical experience under the Company’s stock option plan.
Forfeiture rate of 5% was determined based on historical data of the Company’s stock option forfeitures.
The weighted-average fair value per share of options granted during 2009 was $6.57 compared to $13.82 for the year ended 2008, and $15.07 for the year ended 2007.
The underlying assumptions used were as follows:
 
                         
    2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Risk-free interest rate
    2.76 %     4.15 %     4.68 %
Expected stock price volatility
    41.51       29.86       24.75  
Expected dividend yield
    3.83       2.76       2.53  
Expected option term
    6.1 years       6 years       5.8 years  
 
 
 
Net income for 2009, 2008 and 2007 included pretax stock-based compensation expense, which related to stock-options, PUs, RSUs and restricted stock, of $25.8 million, $29 million, and $21.6 million, respectively. These expenses were included in “Marketing, general and administrative expense” and were recorded in corporate expense and the Company’s operating segments, as appropriate. The total recognized tax benefit related to these stock-based compensation expenses for 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $8.5 million, $9.7 million, and $7.2 million, respectively. No stock-based compensation cost was capitalized for the years ended 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
 
The following table sets forth stock option information related to the Company’s stock option plans during 2009:
 
                                 
                Weighted-
       
          Weighted-
    average
       
    Number
    average
    remaining
    Aggregate
 
    of options
    exercise
    contractual
    intrinsic value
 
    (in thousands)     price     life (in years)     (in millions)  
   
 
Outstanding at December 27, 2008
    10,835.7     $      56.67       5.88     $      1.7  
Granted
    2,213.1       22.59                  
Exercised
    (26.7 )     21.50                  
Forfeited or expired
    (2,261.9 )     56.80                  
 
 
Outstanding at January 2, 2010
    10,760.2     $ 49.72       5.87     $ 34.0  
Options vested and expected to vest at January 2, 2010
    10,529.4       50.07       5.81       32.0  
Options exercisable at January 2, 2010
    7,193.9     $ 56.51       4.56     $ 4.3  
 
 
 
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $.2 million in 2009, $1.9 million in 2008 and $15.4 million in 2007. Cash received by the Company from the exercise of these stock options was approximately $.6 million in 2009, $3 million in 2008 and $38 million in 2007. The tax deduction associated with these options exercised was $.1 million in 2009, $.6 million in 2008 and $5 million in 2007. The intrinsic value of the stock options is based on the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.

60 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
The following table provides a summary of the Company’s stock option plans for the last three years:
 
                                                 
    2009     2008     2007  
               
    Number
    Weighted-
    Number
    Weighted-
    Number
    Weighted-
 
    of options
    average
    of options
    average
    of options
    average
 
    (in thousands)     exercise price     (in thousands)     exercise price     (in thousands)     exercise price  
               
 
Outstanding at beginning of year
    10,835.7     $ 56.67       9,619.2     $ 57.29       10,188.4     $ 58.47  
Granted
    2,213.1       22.59       2,167.8       51.42       52.5       61.62  
Converted from Paxar
                            955.4       31.82  
Exercised
    (26.7 )     21.50       (182.4 )     36.66       (1,011.5 )     48.91  
Forfeited or expired
    (2,261.9 )     56.80       (768.9 )     54.37       (565.6 )     53.87  
 
 
Outstanding at end of year
    10,760.2     $ 49.72       10,835.7     $ 56.67       9,619.2     $ 57.29  
 
 
 
The Company generally grants its annual stock option awards to employees and directors. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation awards granted to retirement-eligible employees be treated as though they were immediately vested; as a result, the pretax compensation expense related to stock options granted to retirement-eligible of approximately $.5 million and $3 million were recognized during 2009 and 2008, respectively, and are included in the stock option expense noted below. During 2007, the recognized pretax compensation expense related to stock options granted to retirement-eligible employees was not significant, as the Company did not grant its annual stock option awards to employees and directors.
Net income for 2009, 2008 and 2007 included pretax stock option expense of $17 million, $18.6 million, and $15.8 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes the Company’s unvested stock options during 2009:
 
                 
    Number of
    Weighted-
 
    options
    average
 
    (in thousands)     exercise price  
   
 
Unvested options outstanding at December 27, 2008
    2,838.5     $      55.50  
Granted
    2,213.1       22.59  
Vested
    (1,179.6 )     53.44  
Forfeited
    (305.7 )     52.57  
 
 
Unvested options outstanding at January 2, 2010
    3,566.3     $ 36.01  
 
 
 
As of January 2, 2010, the Company had approximately $26 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards granted under the Company’s plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of approximately 3 years.
 
The following table summarizes information on stock options outstanding and exercisable at January 2, 2010:
 
                                             
      Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
         
            Weighted-
                   
            average
             
      Number
    remaining
    Weighted-
    Number
    Weighted-
 
      outstanding
    contractual life
    average
    exercisable
    average
 
Range of exercise prices   (in thousands)     (in years)     exercise price     (in thousands)     exercise price  
         
$ 19.20 to 28.63       2,145.3       8.65     $ 21.49       242.2     $ 21.36  
  30.05 to 45.53       532.7       5.79       35.49       355.7       34.78  
  49.44 to 57.96       3,640.7       5.34       53.27       2,412.6       54.05  
  58.72 to 67.80       4,441.5       4.97       62.15       4,183.4       61.82  
 
 
$ 19.20 to 67.80       10,760.2       5.87     $ 49.72       7,193.9     $ 56.51  
 
 

We identify your world 61


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
The following section presents the same information as above, but excludes the impact of Paxar converted stock options.
 
Stock Option Awards Excluding Paxar Converted Stock Options
The following table sets forth stock option information relative to the Company’s stock option plans, excluding Paxar converted stock options, during 2009:
 
                                 
                Weighted-
       
          Weighted-
    average
       
    Number
    average
    remaining
    Aggregate
 
    of options
    exercise
    contractual
    intrinsic value
 
    (in thousands)     price     life (in years)     (in millions)  
   
 
Outstanding at December 27, 2008
    10,296.1     $ 58.02       5.97     $ .1  
Granted
    2,213.1       22.59                  
Exercised
                           
Forfeited or expired
    (2,204.6 )     57.40                  
 
 
Outstanding at January 2, 2010
    10,304.6     $ 50.54       5.99     $ 31.2  
Options vested and expected to vest at January 2, 2010
    10,073.7       50.93       5.93       29.1  
Options exercisable at January 2, 2010
    6,738.3     $ 58.23       4.65     $ 1.4  
 
 
 
Excluding Paxar converted stock option exercises, there were no stock options exercised in 2009. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $.3 million in 2008 and $13.4 million in 2007. Cash received by the Company from the exercise of these stock options was $.2 million in 2008 and $36.2 million in 2007. The tax deduction associated with these options exercised was $.1 million in 2008 and $4.7 million in 2007. The intrinsic value of the stock options is based on the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
The pretax compensation expense related to stock options granted to retirement-eligible of approximately $.5 million and $3 million were recognized during 2009 and 2008, respectively, and are included in the stock option expense noted below. During 2007, the recognized pretax compensation expense related to stock options granted to retirement-eligible employees was not significant, as the Company did not grant its annual stock option awards to employees and directors.
Net income for 2009, 2008 and 2007 included pretax stock option expense of $16.8 million, $18 million, and $14.7 million, respectively.
 
The following table provides a summary of the Company’s stock option plans, excluding Paxar converted stock options, for the last three years:
 
                                                 
    2009     2008     2007  
               
    Number
    Weighted-
    Number
    Weighted-
    Number
    Weighted-
 
    of options
    average
    of options
    average
    of options
    average
 
    (in thousands)     exercise price     (in thousands)     exercise price     (in thousands)     exercise price  
               
 
Outstanding at beginning of year
    10,296.1     $ 58.02       8,974.3     $ 59.20       10,188.4     $ 58.47  
Granted
    2,213.1       22.59       2,167.8       51.42       52.5       61.62  
Exercised
                (81.7 )     45.19       (940.4 )     50.33  
Forfeited or expired
    (2,204.6 )     57.40       (764.3 )     54.49       (326.2 )     61.80  
 
 
Outstanding at end of year
    10,304.6     $ 50.54       10,296.1     $ 58.02       8,974.3     $ 59.20  
 
 
 
The following table summarizes the Company’s unvested stock options, excluding Paxar converted stock options, during 2009:
 
                 
    Number of options
    Weighted-average
 
    (in thousands)     exercise price  
   
 
Unvested options outstanding at December 27, 2008
    2,824.0     $ 55.59  
Granted
    2,213.1       22.59  
Vested
    (1,166.0 )     53.62  
Forfeited
    (304.8 )     52.61  
 
 
Unvested options outstanding at January 2, 2010
    3,566.3     $ 36.01  
 
 
 
As of January 2, 2010, the Company had approximately $26 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards granted under the Company’s plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of approximately 3 years.

62 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
The following table summarizes information on stock options outstanding and exercisable, excluding Paxar converted stock options, at January 2, 2010:
 
                                             
      Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
         
            Weighted-
                   
            average
    Weighted-
          Weighted-
 
      Number
    remaining
    average
    Number
    average
 
      outstanding
    contractual life
    exercise
    exercisable
    exercise
 
Range of exercise prices   (in thousands)     (in years)     price     (in thousands)     price  
         
 
$ 19.20 to 28.63       2,030.8       9.08     $ 21.49       127.7     $ 21.23  
  30.53 to 45.53       191.6       9.18       37.58       14.6       45.53  
  49.44 to 57.96       3,640.7       5.34       53.27       2,412.6       54.05  
  58.72 to 67.80       4,441.5       4.97       62.15       4,183.4       61.82  
 
 
$ 19.20 to 67.80       10,304.6       5.99     $ 50.54       6,738.3     $ 58.23  
 
 
 
Performance Units
Since the second quarter of 2008, following the Company’s shareholders’ approval of the amended and restated stock option and incentive plan on April 24, 2008, the Company has granted PUs to certain eligible employees of the Company. These PUs are payable in shares of the Company’s common stock at the end of a three-year cliff vesting period provided that certain performance metrics are achieved at the end of each respective performance period. The pretax compensation expense related to PUs was $3.1 million and $1.2 million for the years ended 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of January 2, 2010, the Company had approximately $4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to these PUs, which reflects the Company’s current expectation of meeting certain performance metrics. This cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of approximately 2 years.
 
The following table summarizes information about awarded PUs:
 
                 
          Weighted-
 
    Number of
    average
 
    PUs
    grant-date
 
    (in thousands)     fair value  
   
 
Unvested at December 27, 2008
    254.8     $ 43.94  
Granted
    474.7       12.06  
Vested
    (15.8 )     35.98  
Forfeited
    (62.5 )     31.28  
 
 
Unvested at January 2, 2010(1)
    651.2     $ 22.12  
 
 
(1) At the end of each respective performance period, the actual number of shares issued can range from 0% to 200% of the target shares granted.
 
Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock
In December 2005, the Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors approved the award of RSUs, which were issued under the Company’s stock option and incentive plan. RSUs are granted to two groups of employees as described below. Certain RSUs include dividend equivalents in the form of additional RSUs, which are equivalent to the amount of the dividend paid or property distributed on a single share of common stock multiplied by the number of RSUs in the employee’s account. Vesting for the two groups of RSUs is as follows:
 
  o  A vesting period of 3 years provided that a certain performance objective is met at the end of the third year after the year of the award. If the performance objective is not achieved at the end of the third year, the same unvested RSUs will be subject to meeting the performance objective at the end of the fourth year, and if not achieved at the end of the fourth year, then the fifth year following the year of grant, or
  o  A vesting period of 1 to 5 years provided that employment continues for 1 to 5 years after the date of the award.
For both groups, if the above vesting conditions are not met, the RSUs will be forfeited.
The following table summarizes information about awarded RSUs:
 
                 
          Weighted-
 
    Number of
    average
 
    RSUs
    grant-date
 
    (in thousands)     fair value  
   
 
Unvested at December 27, 2008
    423.8     $ 57.53  
Granted
    543.4       17.47  
Vested
    (114.9 )     51.42  
Forfeited
    (69.0 )     39.25  
 
 
Unvested at January 2, 2010
    783.3     $ 32.24  
 
 
 
The total compensation expense related to RSUs and restricted stock is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.
The pretax compensation expense related to RSUs was $5.5 million, $7.8 million and $4.3 million for the years ended 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The tax deduction associated with the vesting of RSUs and the related issuance of common stock was approximately $1.5 million in 2009, $.8 million in 2008 and $.1 million in 2007.
During 2005, the Company also awarded 30,000 shares of restricted stock, which vest in two equal increments, the first vested in 2009 and the second will vest in 2012. Pretax compensation expense for this award was approximately $.1 million in 2009, and $.3 million each in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation awards granted to retirement-eligible employees as though they were immediately vested; as a result, the pretax compensation expense related to RSUs granted to retirement-eligible employees was recognized and included in the compensation expense noted above.
As of January 2, 2010, the Company had approximately $12 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs and restricted stock. This cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining requisite service period (weighted-average remaining service period of approximately 2 years for RSUs and 3 years for restricted stock).

We identify your world 63


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
Paxar Converted Stock Option Awards
In connection with the Paxar acquisition in 2007, the Company converted Paxar’s stock options based on the acquisition price of $30.50 per share divided by the Company’s twenty-day average stock price prior to the acquisition date, which was $64.82. The total number of stock options resulting from this conversion was approximately 955,000 shares, of which approximately 234,000 shares were associated with change-in-control provisions. The total equity compensation recorded in “Capital in excess of par value” in the Shareholders’ equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheet was approximately $24 million for Paxar’s converted stock options. This amount was reduced by approximately $2 million related to unvested stock options.
The Company’s stock-based compensation expense associated with Paxar converted stock options was based on the estimated fair value as of June 15, 2007, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining requisite service period. The Black-Scholes assumptions used were consistent with those used by the Company during the second quarter of 2007.
 
The following table sets forth stock option information relative to Paxar converted stock option plans during 2009:
 
                                 
                Weighted-
       
          Weighted-
    average
       
    Number
    average
    remaining
    Aggregate
 
    of options
    exercise
    contractual
    intrinsic value
 
    (in thousands)     price     life (in years)     (in millions)  
   
 
Outstanding at December 27, 2008
    539.6     $ 30.93       4.07     $ 1.6  
Exercised
    (26.7 )     21.50                  
Forfeited or expired
    (57.3 )     33.94                  
 
 
Outstanding at January 2, 2010
    455.6     $ 31.10       3.16     $ 2.8  
Options vested and exercisable at January 2, 2010
    455.6     $ 31.10       3.16     $ 2.8  
 
 
 
The total intrinsic value of Paxar converted stock options exercised was $.2 million in 2009, $1.6 million in 2008 and $2 million in 2007. Cash received by the Company from the exercise of these stock options was $.6 million in 2009, $2.5 million in 2008 and $1.9 million in 2007. The tax deduction associated with these exercised options was $.1 million in 2009, $.5 million in 2008 and $.2 million in 2007. The intrinsic value of the stock options is based on the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
 
The following table summarizes Paxar converted unvested stock options during 2009:
 
                 
          Weighted-
 
    Number
    average
 
    of options
    exercise
 
    (in thousands)     price  
   
 
Unvested options outstanding at December 27, 2008
    14.5     $ 38.07  
Vested
    (13.6 )     38.07  
Forfeited
    (.9 )     38.07  
 
 
Unvested options outstanding at January 2, 2010
        $  
 
 
 
The pretax compensation expense related to Paxar converted stock options was approximately $.2 million in 2009, $.6 million in 2008 and $1 million in 2007. As of January 2, 2010, the Company had no additional unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested Paxar converted stock option awards.
 
The following table summarizes information on the Paxar converted stock options outstanding and exercisable at January 2, 2010:
 
                                             
      Options outstanding     Options exercisable  
         
            Weighted-
                   
            average
                   
      Number
    remaining
    Weighted-
    Number
    Weighted-
 
      outstanding
    contractual life
    average
    exercisable
    average
 
Range of exercise prices   (in thousands)     (in years)     exercise price     (in thousands)     exercise price  
         
 
$ 19.80 to 24.68       114.5       1.00     $ 21.52       114.5     $ 21.52  
  30.05 to 43.25       341.1       3.88       34.32       341.1       34.32  
 
 
$ 19.80 to 43.25       455.6       3.16     $ 31.10       455.6     $ 31.10  
 
 
 
Paxar Converted Performance Share Awards
Additionally, the Company converted Paxar’s performance share awards into approximately 80,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, based on the acquisition price of $30.50 per share divided by the Company’s twenty-day average stock price prior to the acquisition date, which was $64.82. The total equity compensation of approximately $5 million for vested and unvested performance share awards, recorded in “Capital in excess of par value” in the Shareholders’ equity section of

64 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
the Consolidated Balance Sheet was calculated using the Company’s ending stock price at June 15, 2007 of $66.69. This amount was reduced by approximately $3 million related to unvested performance share awards.
The pretax compensation expense related to Paxar converted performance share awards was $.1 million in 2009, $1.1 million in 2008 and $.9 million in 2007. The tax deduction associated with the vesting of performance shares and the related issuance of common stock was $.4 million in 2009 and $.2 million in 2008.
As of January 2, 2010, the Company had no additional unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested converted Paxar performance share awards.
 
NOTE 10. COST REDUCTION ACTIONS
 
Severance charges recorded under the restructuring actions below are included in “Other accrued liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Severance and other employee costs represent cash paid or to be paid to employees terminated under these actions. Asset impairments are based on the estimated market value of the assets. Charges below are included in “Other expense, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
 
2009
In 2009, the Company continued its cost reduction efforts that were initiated in late 2008, resulting in a reduction of approximately 3,335 positions, impairment of certain assets, and lease cancellations. At January 2, 2010, approximately 1,020 employees impacted by these actions remain with the Company, and are expected to leave in 2010. Pretax charges related to these actions totaled $129.1 million, including severance and related costs of $86.8 million, impairment of fixed assets, buildings, land and patents of $39.9 million, and lease cancellation charges of $2.4 million. The table below details the accruals and payments related to these actions:
 
                                         
    Pressure-
    Retail
    Office and
    Other
       
    sensitive
    Information
    Consumer
    specialty
       
    Materials
    Services
    Products
    converting
       
(In millions)   Segment     Segment     Segment     businesses     Total  
   
Total severance and other employee costs accrued during the period ended
                                       
April 4, 2009
  $ 7.6     $ 5.8     $ .9     $ 2.8     $ 17.1  
July 4, 2009
    13.4       4.6       .3       7.5       25.8  
October 3, 2009
    3.9       21.0       (.2 )     2.3       27.0  
January 2, 2010
    2.3       6.3       8.0       .3       16.9  
 
 
Total expense accrued during 2009
    27.2       37.7       9.0       12.9       86.8  
2009 Settlements
    (19.5 )     (23.6 )     (.3 )     (11.0 )     (54.4 )
 
 
Balance at January 2, 2010
  $ 7.7     $ 14.1     $ 8.7     $ 1.9     $ 32.4  
 
 
Asset Impairments
                                       
Machinery and equipment
  $ 2.7     $ 10.6     $ .7     $ 14.0     $ 28.0  
Buildings
    .7       2.4       3.9       .9       7.9  
Land
    .1                         .1  
Patents
    1.9       .2       .4       1.4       3.9  
Other
                                       
Lease cancellations
    1.7       .7                   2.4  
 
 
    $ 7.1     $ 13.9     $ 5.0     $ 16.3     $ 42.3  
 
 
 
2008
In 2008, the Company implemented cost reduction actions, including the new action initiated in the fourth quarter, resulting in a reduction of approximately 1,475 positions, impairment of certain assets and software, as well as lease cancellations. At January 2, 2010, approximately 5 employees impacted by these actions remain with the Company, and are expected to leave in 2010. Pretax charges related to these actions totaled $40.7 million, including

We identify your world 65


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
severance and related costs of $29.8 million, impairment of fixed assets and buildings of $7.7 million, lease cancellation charges of $2.3 million and software impairment of $.9 million. The table below details the accruals and payments related to these actions:
 
                                         
    Pressure-
    Retail
    Office and
    Other
       
    sensitive
    Information
    Consumer
    specialty
       
    Materials
    Services
    Products
    converting
       
(In millions)   Segment     Segment     Segment     businesses     Total  
   
 
Total severance and other employee costs accrued during the period ended
                                       
March 29, 2008
  $ 1.5     $ 1.4     $ .2     $ .2     $ 3.3  
June 28, 2008
    .2       2.8       4.2             7.2  
September 27, 2008
    2.5       1.4       3.2       1.6       8.7  
December 27, 2008
    2.5       3.8       3.1       1.2       10.6  
 
 
Total expense accrued during 2008
    6.7       9.4       10.7       3.0       29.8  
2008 Settlements
    (1.5 )     (4.7 )     (5.2 )     (1.1 )     (12.5 )
2009 Settlements
    (5.0 )     (4.6 )     (4.8 )     (1.8 )     (16.2 )
 
 
Balance at January 2, 2010
  $ .2     $ .1     $ .7     $ .1     $ 1.1  
 
 
Asset Impairments
                                       
Machinery and equipment
  $ 4.9     $ 1.3     $ 1.2     $ .2     $ 7.6  
Buildings
          .1                   .1  
Other
                                       
Lease cancellations
    .9       1.4                   2.3  
Software impairment
                .9             .9  
 
 
    $ 5.8     $ 2.8     $ 2.1     $ .2     $ 10.9  
 
 
 
2007
In 2007, the Company continued its cost reduction efforts that were initiated in late 2006 and implemented additional actions resulting in a reduction of approximately 615 positions, impairment of certain assets and software, as well as lease cancellations. At January 2, 2010, no employees impacted by these actions remain with the Company. Pretax charges related to these actions totaled $57.5 million, including severance and other employee costs of $21.6 million, impairment of fixed assets and buildings of $17.4 million, software impairment of $17.1 million and lease cancellation charges of $1.4 million.
 
NOTE 11. TAXES BASED ON INCOME
 
Taxes based on income (loss) were as follows:
 
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Current:
                       
U.S. federal tax
  $ (15.6 )   $ 34.1     $ 23.9  
State taxes
    1.8       4.2       1.3  
International taxes
    61.3       96.6       80.8  
 
 
      47.5       134.9       106.0  
 
 
Deferred:
                       
U.S. federal tax
    (39.2 )     (36.5 )     (15.4 )
State taxes
    (7.6 )     2.3       (1.7 )
International taxes
    (44.9 )     (96.2 )     (17.1 )
 
 
      (91.7 )     (130.4 )     (34.2 )
 
 
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
  $ (44.2 )   $ 4.5     $ 71.8  
 
 
 
The principal items accounting for the difference in taxes as computed at the U.S. statutory rate, and as recorded, were as follows:
 
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Computed tax at 35% of income (loss) before taxes
  $ (276.8 )   $ 94.7     $ 131.4  
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
                       
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit
    (7.9 )     3.5       (1.2 )
Foreign earnings taxed at different rates
    (5.9 )     (62.2 )     (117.0 )
Valuation allowance
    4.0       (45.3 )     59.9  
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment
    276.4              
Deferred compensation assets
    (30.5 )            
U.S. federal tax credits (R&D and low-income housing)
    (2.8 )     (5.2 )     (4.4 )
Tax contingencies and audit settlements
    7.2       24.8       0.8  
Other items, net
    (7.9 )     (5.8 )     2.3  
 
 
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
  $ (44.2 )   $ 4.5     $ 71.8  
 
 

66 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
Consolidated income (loss) before taxes for U.S. and international operations was as follows:
 
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
U.S. 
  $ (412.6 )   $ (14.2 )   $ 19.8  
International
    (378.3 )     284.8       355.5  
 
 
Income (loss) before taxes
  $ (790.9 )   $ 270.6     $ 375.3  
 
 
 
The effective tax rate was approximately 6% for the full year 2009 compared with approximately 2% for the full year 2008. The 2009 effective tax rate is most significantly influenced by the non-cash goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges, as these expenses are largely not tax deductible, and from one-time benefits from tax planning actions, partially offset by increases to the Company’s tax reserves.
Income taxes have not been provided on certain undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries of approximately $1.23 billion and $1.63 billion at years ended 2009 and 2008, respectively, because such earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that would be payable upon distribution of these earnings. Deferred taxes have been accrued for earnings that are not considered indefinitely reinvested. The repatriation accrual for 2009 and 2008 is $21.7 million and $12.5 million, respectively.
Deferred income taxes reflect the temporary differences between the amounts at which assets and liabilities are recorded for financial reporting purposes and the amounts utilized for tax purposes. The primary components of the temporary differences that gave rise to the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
 
                 
(In millions)   2009     2008  
   
 
Accrued expenses not currently deductible
  $ 65.8     $ 59.4  
Net operating losses
    214.7       235.5  
Tax credit carryforwards
    101.8       70.5  
Capital loss carryforward
    14.1       14.5  
Postretirement and postemployment benefits
    94.8       57.7  
Pension costs
    107.3       114.9  
Inventory reserves
    11.3       10.6  
Other assets
    1.7       11.3  
Valuation allowance
    (115.4 )     (109.2 )
 
 
Total deferred tax assets(1)
    496.1       465.2  
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
    (184.3 )     (222.1 )
Repatriation accrual
    (21.7 )     (12.5 )
Foreign operating loss recapture
          (39.1 )
Other liabilities
    (13.0 )     (11.1 )
 
 
Total deferred tax liabilities(1)
    (219.0 )     (284.8 )
 
 
Total net deferred tax assets (liabilities) from operations
  $ 277.1     $ 180.4  
 
 
(1) Reflects gross amount before jurisdictional netting of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
 
A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. When establishing a valuation allowance, the Company considers future sources of taxable income such as “future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards” and “tax planning strategies.”
Net operating loss carryforwards of foreign subsidiaries for 2009 and 2008 were $709.6 million and $762.6 million, respectively. The decrease in 2009 is attributable to certain European statutory investment value increases, partially offset by net operating losses generated in 2009. If unused, foreign net operating losses of $37.1 million will expire between 2010 and 2013, and $101.9 million will expire after 2013. Net operating losses of $570.6 million can be carried forward indefinitely. Tax credit carryforwards of both domestic and foreign subsidiaries for 2009 and 2008 totaled $101.8 million and $70.5 million, respectively. If unused, tax credit carryforwards of $3.8 million will expire between 2010 and 2012, $22.6 million will expire between 2013 and 2017, and $66.6 million will expire after 2017. Tax credit carryforwards of $8.8 million can be carried forward indefinitely. The Company has established a valuation allowance for the net operating loss and credit carryforwards not expected to be utilized. The valuation allowance for 2009 and 2008 is $115.4 million and $109.2 million, respectively. Similar to prior years, the Company has reorganized some of its operations and intercompany financing which results in current or future year profits in jurisdictions that previously had recognized losses. These profits allow realization of net operating loss deferred assets, and as such the Company has released valuation allowances.
The Company has been granted tax holidays in several jurisdictions including Bangladesh, China, Thailand and Vietnam. The tax holidays expire between 2010 and 2017. These tax holidays benefit the Company’s consolidated effective tax rate on operations by less than 1%.
 
Tax Benefit Reserve
On January 2, 2010, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits totaled $182.0 million, including $121.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits which, if recognized, would reduce the annual effective income tax rate. As of December 27, 2008, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits totaled $163.7 million, including $97.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits which, if recognized, would reduce the annual effective income tax rate.
Where applicable, the Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits from its global operations in income tax expense. The Company recognized $1.1 million, $7.6 million and $.7 million of interest and penalties in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company has accrued for $23.4 million and $15.4 million of interest and penalties in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in 2009 and 2008, respectively.

We identify your world 67


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
 
                 
(In millions)   2009     2008  
   
 
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 142.9     $ 114.5  
Acquired balance
    8.0        
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
    32.0       23.1  
Additions for tax position of prior years
    9.8       37.8  
Reductions for tax positions of prior years:
               
Changes in judgment
    (1.8 )     (0.2 )
Settlements
    (2.1 )     (2.5 )
Lapses of applicable statute
    (41.9 )     (23.0 )
Changes due to translation of foreign currencies
    4.8       (6.8 )
 
 
Balance at end of year (excluding interest and penalties)
    151.7       142.9  
Interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions
    30.3       20.8  
 
 
Balance at end of year (including interest and penalties)
  $ 182.0     $ 163.7  
 
 
 
The amount of income taxes the Company pays is subject to ongoing audits by taxing jurisdictions around the world. The Company’s estimate of the potential outcome of any uncertain tax issue is subject to management’s assessment of relevant risks, facts, and circumstances existing at that time. The Company believes that it has adequately provided for reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to these matters. However, the Company’s future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to its estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are made or resolved, which may impact the Company’s effective tax rate. With some exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2005.
It is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months, the Company may realize a decrease in its gross uncertain tax positions by approximately $63 million, primarily as the result of cash payments and closing tax years. The Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that cash payments of up to $16 million relating to gross uncertain tax positions could be paid within the next 12 months.
 
NOTE 12. SEGMENT INFORMATION
 
The accounting policies of the segments are described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” Intersegment sales are recorded at or near market prices and are eliminated in determining consolidated sales. The Company evaluates performance based on income from operations before interest expense and taxes. General corporate expenses are also excluded from the computation of income from operations for the segments.
The Company does not disclose total assets by reportable segment since the Company does not produce and review such information internally. The Company does not disclose revenues from external customers for each product because it is impracticable to do so. As the Company’s reporting structure is not organized by country, results by individual country are not provided because it is impracticable to do so.
Financial information by reportable segment and other businesses from operations is set forth below. Beginning in 2009, the Company modified its approach to allocating Corporate costs to its reportable segments to better reflect the costs required to support operations within segment results. Prior year amounts have been restated to conform with the new methodology.
 
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Net sales to unaffiliated customers:
Pressure-sensitive Materials
  $ 3,300.0     $ 3,643.8     $ 3,497.7  
Retail Information Services
    1,323.2       1,548.7       1,175.4  
Office and Consumer Products
    849.3       935.8       1,016.2  
Other specialty converting businesses
    480.2       582.1       618.5  
 
 
Net sales to unaffiliated customers
  $ 5,952.7     $ 6,710.4     $ 6,307.8  
 
 
                         
Intersegment sales:
                       
Pressure-sensitive Materials
  $ 148.9     $ 172.4     $ 164.9  
Retail Information Services
    1.6       2.1       2.1  
Office and Consumer Products
    .7       1.2       1.6  
Other specialty converting businesses
    16.2       26.4       19.9  
Eliminations
    (167.4 )     (202.1 )     (188.5 )
 
 
Intersegment sales
  $     $     $  
 
 
 
Income (loss) before taxes:
Pressure-sensitive Materials
  $ 184.7     $ 257.2     $ 322.3  
Retail Information Services
    (900.4 )     11.3       (4.6 )
Office and Consumer Products
    118.1       145.7       174.6  
Other specialty converting businesses
    (42.7 )     7.4       27.7  
Corporate expense
    (65.3 )     (35.1 )     (39.5 )
Interest expense(4)
    (85.3 )     (115.9 )     (105.2 )
 
 
Income (loss) before taxes
  $ (790.9 )(1)   $ 270.6 (2)   $ 375.3 (3)
 
 
                         
Capital expenditures:
                       
Pressure-sensitive Materials
  $ 41.5     $ 50.1     $ 78.3  
Retail Information Services
    19.6       45.0       43.2  
Office and Consumer Products
    5.6       6.1       17.1  
Other specialty converting businesses
    7.6       16.6       46.2  
Corporate
    1.3       1.4       1.5  
 
 
Capital expenditures(5)
  $ 75.6     $ 119.2     $ 186.3  
 
 
                         
Depreciation expense:
                       
Pressure-sensitive Materials
  $ 86.2     $ 91.7     $ 91.2  
Retail Information Services
    58.3       65.6       42.5  
Office and Consumer Products
    13.6       17.0       21.8  
Other specialty converting businesses
    25.6       26.3       24.6  
Corporate
    3.9       4.0       4.0  
 
 
Depreciation expense
  $ 187.6     $ 204.6     $ 184.1  
 
 
 
(1) Results for 2009 included “Other expense, net” totaling $191.3, consisting of restructuring costs, asset impairment charges and lease cancellation costs of $129.1, legal settlement costs of $41, and a loss of $21.2 from debt extinguishment. Of the total $191.3, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment recorded $75.3, the Retail Information Services segment recorded $51.6, the

68 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
Office and Consumer Products segment recorded $14, the other specialty converting businesses recorded $29.2 and Corporate recorded $21.2.
 
Additionally, 2009 operating loss for the Retail Information Services segment included $832 of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges taken in the first quarter of 2009.
 
(2) Results for 2008 included “Other expense, net” totaling $36.2, consisting of restructuring costs, asset impairment charges and lease cancellation costs of $40.7, partially offset by a gain on sale of investments of $(4.5). Of the total $36.2, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment recorded $12.6, the Retail Information Services segment recorded $12.2, the Office and Consumer Products segment recorded $12.7, the other specialty converting businesses recorded $3.2 and Corporate recorded $(4.5).
 
Additionally, 2008 operating income for the Retail Information Services segment included $24.1 of transition costs associated with the Paxar and DM Label acquisitions.
 
(3) Results for 2007 included “Other expense, net” totaling $59.4, consisting of asset impairment charges, restructuring costs and lease cancellation charges of $57.5, a cash flow hedge loss of $4.8, and expenses related to a divestiture of $.3, partially offset by a reversal related to a lawsuit of $(3.2). Of the total $59.4, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment recorded $14.3, the Retail Information Services segment recorded $31.3, the Office and Consumer Products segment recorded $4.8, the other specialty converting businesses recorded $4.2 and Corporate recorded $4.8.
 
Additionally, 2007 operating income for the Retail Information Services segment included $43 of transition costs associated with the Paxar acquisition.
 
(4) Interest expense during 2009, 2008 and 2007 included $42, $65.5 and $40.8, respectively, of interest associated with borrowings to fund the Paxar and DM Label acquisitions.
 
(5) Includes capital expenditures accrued but not paid of approximately $8 in 2009, approximately $5 in 2008 and approximately $14 in 2007. Capital expenditures refer to purchases of property, plant and equipment.
 
Financial information relating to the Company’s operations by geographic area is set forth below:
 
                         
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007  
   
 
Net sales to unaffiliated customers:
U.S. 
  $ 2,026.4     $ 2,218.4     $ 2,333.2  
Europe
    1,949.4       2,366.6       2,149.9  
Asia
    1,236.8       1,297.6       1,070.9  
Latin America
    394.2       448.0       396.7  
Other international
    345.9       379.8       357.1  
 
 
Net sales
  $ 5,952.7     $ 6,710.4     $ 6,307.8  
 
 
Property, plant and equipment, net:
U.S. 
  $ 509.3     $ 604.2     $ 637.9  
International
    845.4       888.8       953.5  
 
 
Property, plant and equipment, net
  $ 1,354.7     $ 1,493.0     $ 1,591.4  
 
 
 
Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location to which the product is shipped. Export sales from the United States to unaffiliated customers are not a material factor in the Company’s business.
 
NOTE 13. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
 
                                 
    First
    Second
    Third
    Fourth
 
(In millions, except per share data)   Quarter(1)      Quarter(2)      Quarter(3)      Quarter(4)   
   
 
2009
                               
Net sales
  $ 1,426.2     $ 1,455.4     $ 1,549.3     $ 1,521.8  
Gross profit
    345.1       390.3       436.0       415.1  
Net income (loss)
    (898.9 )     39.8       62.5       49.9  
Net income (loss) per common share
    (8.99 )     .38       .59       .47  
Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution
    (8.99 )     .38       .59       .47  
 
 
2008
                               
Net sales
  $ 1,645.2     $ 1,828.9     $ 1,724.8     $ 1,511.5  
Gross profit
    424.0       490.3       434.3       378.4  
Net income
    68.4       92.4       62.7       42.6  
Net income per common share
    .70       .94       .64       .43  
Net income per common share, assuming dilution
    .69       .93       .63       .43  
 
 
(1) Results in the first quarter of 2009 included pretax “Other expense, net” totaling $97.3 consisting of asset impairment charges of $21.9, restructuring costs of $17.1, lease cancellation charges of $.1, an accrual for a legal settlement of $37, and a loss of $21.2 from debt extinguishment. Additionally, results included goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges of $832.
 
Results in the first quarter of 2008 included pretax “Other expense, net” totaling $5.6 consisting of restructuring costs of $3.3 and asset impairment charges of $2.3. Additionally, results included transition costs associated with acquisition integrations of $7.
 
(2) Results in the second quarter of 2009 included pretax “Other expense, net” totaling $29.6 consisting of restructuring costs of $25.8 asset impairment charges of $3.3, and lease cancellation charges of $.5.
 
Results in the second quarter of 2008 included pretax “Other expense, net” totaling $5.8 consisting of restructuring costs of $7.2 and asset impairment charges of $1.7, and lease cancellation charges of $1.4, partially offset by a gain on sale of investments of $(4.5). Additionally, results included transition costs associated with acquisition integrations of $5.7.
 
(3) Results in the third quarter of 2009 included pretax “Other expense, net” totaling $35.5 consisting of restructuring costs of $27 and asset impairment charges of $4.7, lease cancellation charges of $1.8, and legal settlement charges of $2.
 
Results in the third quarter of 2008 included pretax “Other expense, net” totaling $12.5 consisting of restructuring costs of $8.7 and asset impairment charges of $3, and lease cancellation charges of $.8. Additionally, results included transition costs associated with acquisition integrations of $5.2.
 
(4) Results in the fourth quarter of 2009 included pretax “Other expense, net” totaling $28.9 consisting of restructuring costs of $16.9, asset impairment charges of $9.9, lease cancellation charges of $.1, and legal settlement charges of $2. Additionally, results included out-of-period adjustments related to deferred compensation assets of $4.9 and a deferred tax asset of $1, which decreased net income by $5.9.
 
Results in the fourth quarter of 2008 included pretax “Other expense, net” totaling $12.3 consisting of restructuring costs of $10.6, and asset impairment charges of $1.7. Additionally, results included transition costs associated with acquisition integrations of $6.2.

We identify your world 69


 

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

 
 
NOTE 14. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of January 2, 2010:
 
                                 
          Fair Value Measurements Using  
             
                Significant
    Significant
 
                Other
    Other
 
          Quoted Prices in
    Observable
    Unobservable
 
          Active Markets
    Inputs
    Inputs
 
(In millions)   Total     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
   
 
Assets:
                               
Available for sale securities
  $        11.9     $ 11.9     $     $  –  
Derivative assets
    5.5       .5       5.0        
Liabilities:
                               
Derivative liabilities
  $ 10.0     $ 3.5     $ 6.5     $  
 
 
 
Available for sale securities are measured at fair value using quoted prices and classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Derivatives that are exchange-traded are measured at fair value using quoted market prices and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Derivatives measured based on inputs that are readily available in public markets are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
The following table summarizes the fair value measurements of assets measured on a non-recurring basis during 2009:
 
                                         
          Fair Value Measurements Using        
                   
                Significant
    Significant
       
          Quoted Prices in
    Other
    Other
       
          Active Markets
    Observable Inputs
    Unobservable Inputs
    Total
 
(In millions)   Total     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Gains (Losses)  
   
 
Goodwill
  $        415.0     $   –     $     $ 415.0     $ (820.0 )
Indefinite-lived intangible asset
    18.0                   18.0       (12.0 )
Long-lived assets
    11.0             8.0       3.0       (20.3 )
 
 
 
Long-lived assets with carrying amounts totaling $31.3 million were written down to their fair values totaling $11 million, resulting in impairment charges of $20.3 million during 2009. These charges are included in “Other expense, net” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Goodwill with a carrying amount of $1.2 billion was written down to its estimated implied fair value of $415 million, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $820 million in the first quarter of 2009. Additionally, certain indefinite-lived assets with a carrying value of approximately $30 million were written down to their estimated implied fair value of $18 million, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $12 million in the first quarter of 2009. These charges are included in “Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Refer to Note 3, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions,” for further information.

70 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
STATEMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
The consolidated financial statements and accompanying information were prepared by and are the responsibility of management. The statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, as such, include amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments.
 
Oversight of management’s financial reporting and internal accounting control responsibilities is exercised by the Board of Directors, through an Audit Committee, which consists solely of outside directors. The Committee meets periodically with financial management, internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm to obtain reasonable assurance that each is meeting its responsibilities and to discuss matters concerning auditing, internal accounting control and financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm and the Company’s internal audit department have free access to meet with the Audit Committee without management’s presence.
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
 
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the Company’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, management has concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 2, 2010. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2010 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
 
     
 
Dean A. Scarborough
President and
Chief Executive Officer
  Daniel R. O’Bryant
Executive Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer

We identify your world 71


 

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Avery Dennison Corporation:
 
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Avery Dennison Corporation and its subsidiaries at January 2, 2010 and December 27, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 2, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 2, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
 
As discussed in Note 1, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for income taxes in 2007.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 26, 2010

72 Avery Dennison Corporation 2009 Annual Report


 

 
Corporate Information

 
Counsel
Latham & Watkins LLP
Los Angeles, California
 
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
 
Transfer Agent — Registrar
Computershare Trust Co., N.A.
P. O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
(877) 498-8861
(800) 952-9245 (hearing impaired number)
www.computershare.com/investor
 
Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at 1:30 p.m. on April 22, 2010 in the Conference Center of the Avery Dennison Miller Corporate Center, 150 North Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, California.
 
The DirectSERVICEtm Investment Program
Shareholders of record may reinvest their cash dividends in additional shares of Avery Dennison common stock at market price. Investors may also invest optional cash payments of up to $12,500 per month in Avery Dennison common stock at market price. Avery Dennison investors not yet participating in the program, as well as brokers and custodians who hold Avery Dennison common stock for clients, may obtain a copy of the program by writing to The DirectSERVICEtm Investment Program, c/o Computershare (include a reference to Avery Dennison in the correspondence), P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078, or calling (877) 498-8861, or logging onto their web site at http://www.computershare.com/investor.
 
Direct Deposit of Dividends
Avery Dennison shareholders may deposit quarterly dividend checks directly into their checking or savings accounts. For more information, call Avery Dennison’s transfer agent and registrar, Computershare Trust Co., Inc., at (877) 498-8861.
 
Other Information
The Company is including, as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2009 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), certificates of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the Company submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), the Company’s annual written affirmation on April 30, 2009, along with the Chief Executive Officer’s certificate that he is not aware of any violation by the Company of NYSE’s Corporate Governance listing standards.
A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC, will be furnished to shareholders and interested investors free of charge upon written request to the Secretary of the Corporation. Copies may also be obtained from the Company’s web site, www.averydennison.com, in the “Investors” section.
 
Corporate Headquarters
Avery Dennison Corporation
Miller Corporate Center
150 North Orange Grove Boulevard
Pasadena, California 91103
Phone: (626) 304-2000
Fax: (626) 792-7312
 
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 7090
Pasadena, California 91109-7090
 
Stock and Dividend Data
Common shares of Avery Dennison are listed on the NYSE.
Ticker symbol: AVY
 
                                 
    2009     2008  
         
    High     Low     High     Low  
         
Market Price(1)
                               
First Quarter
  $ 33.61     $ 17.26     $ 53.14     $ 45.66  
Second Quarter
    29.76       23.94       53.07       43.61  
Third Quarter
    36.56       24.23       50.00       41.35  
Fourth Quarter
    40.02       34.81       44.49       25.02  
 
 
(1) Prices shown represent closing prices on the NYSE
                 
    2009     2008  
   
Dividends Per Common Share
               
First Quarter
  $ .41     $ .41  
Second Quarter
    .41       .41  
Third Quarter
    .20       .41  
Fourth Quarter
    .20       .41  
 
 
Total
  $ 1.22     $ 1.64  
 
 
                 
Number of shareholders of record as of year end
    8,180       8,584  
 
 

We identify your world 73

exv21
EXHIBIT 21
     
    JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY   IN WHICH ORGANIZED
ADC PHILIPPINES, INC.
  PHILIPPINES
ADESPAN S.R.L.
  ITALY
ADESPAN U.K. LIMITED
  UNITED KINGDOM
ADHIPRESS BANGLADESH LTD.
  BANGLADESH
ADHIPRESS (HONG KONG) LTD.
  HONG KONG
ADVANCE FAR INVESTMENTS LIMITED
  BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS
ALKAHN HONG KONG LABELS LTD.
  HONG KONG
AMERICAN TRIM PRODUCTS (ASIA) LIMITED
  HONG KONG
ARTISTIC INTERNATIONAL (HK) LTD.
  HONG KONG
ASTRIA S.R.L.
  ITALY
AVERY CORP.
  U.S.A.
AVERY DE MEXICO SRL DE CV
  MEXICO
AVERY DENNISON HOLDINGS (MALTA) LIMITED
  MALTA
AVERY DENNISON AUSTRALIA GROUP HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED
  AUSTRALIA
AVERY DENNISON AUSTRALIA INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS PTY LTD.
  AUSTRALIA
AVERY DENNISON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD.
  AUSTRALIA
AVERY DENNISON BELGIE BVBA
  BELGIUM
AVERY DENNISON BENELUX BVBA
  BELGIUM
AVERY DENNISON BULGARIA EOOD
  BULGARIA
AVERY DENNISON BV
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON CANADA CORPORATION
  CANADA
AVERY DENNISON CENTRAL EUROPE GMBH
  GERMANY
AVERY DENNISON CHILE S.A.
  CHILE
AVERY DENNISON COLOMBIA S. A.
  COLOMBIA
AVERY DENNISON CONVERTED PRODUCTS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V.
  MEXICO
AVERY DENNISON CONVERTED PRODUCTS EL SALVADOR S. A. DE C. V.
  EL SALVADOR
AVERY DENNISON COORDINATION CENTER BVBA
  BELGIUM
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
  U.S.A.
AVERY DENNISON C.A.
  VENEZUELA
AVERY DENNISON DE ARGENTINA S.A.
  ARGENTINA
AVERY DENNISON DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
  GERMANY
AVERY DENNISON DO BRASIL LTDA.
  BRAZIL
AVERY DENNISON DOMINICAN REPUBLIC S. A.
  DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
AVERY DENNISON EGYPT LLC
  EGYPT
AVERY DENNISON ETIKET TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
  TURKEY
AVERY DENNISON EUROPE GMBH
  SWITZERLAND
AVERY DENNISON EUROPE HOLDING (DEUTSCHLAND) GMBH & CO KG
  GERMANY
AVERY DENNISON FINANCE BELGIUM BVBA
  BELGIUM
AVERY DENNISON FINANCE GERMANY GMBH
  GERMANY
AVERY DENNISON FINANCE LUXEMBOURG II SARL
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON FINANCE LUXEMBOURG S. A. R. L.
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON FINANCE LUXEMBOURG III SARL
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON FOUNDATION
  U.S.A.
AVERY DENNISON FRANCE S.A.S.
  FRANCE
AVERY DENNISON G HOLDINGS I LLC
  U.S.A.
AVERY DENNISON G HOLDINGS III LLC
  U.S.A.
AVERY DENNISON G INVESTMENTS 111 LIMITED
  GIBRALTAR
AVERY DENNISON G INVESTMENTS V LIMITED
  GIBRALTAR
AVERY DENNISON GROUP DANMARK APS
  DENMARK
AVERY DENNISON GROUP SINGAPORE (PTE) LIMITED
  SINGAPORE

 


 

     
    JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY   IN WHICH ORGANIZED
AVERY DENNISON GULF FZCO
  UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
AVERY DENNISON HOLDING AG
  SWITZERLAND
AVERY DENNISON HOLDING GMBH
  GERMANY
AVERY DENNISON HOLDING LUXEMBOURG S. A. R. L.
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON HOLDING & FINANCE THE NETHERLANDS BV
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON HOLDINGS LLC
  U.S.A.
AVERY DENNISON HOLDINGS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
  NEW ZEALAND
AVERY DENNISON HONG KONG BV
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON HUNGARY LIMITED
  HUNGARY
AVERY DENNISON IBERICA, S.A.
  SPAIN
AVERY DENNISON INVESTMENT LUXEMBOURG II SARL
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON INVESTMENTS LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L.
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON INVESTMENTS LUXEMBOURG III SARL
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON INVESTMENTS LUXEMBOURG IV SARL
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON INVESTMENTS LUXEMBOURG V SCA
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON ITALIA S.R.L.
  ITALY
AVERY DENNISON JAPAN K.K.
  JAPAN
AVERY DENNISON KAGIT URUNLERI SANAYI TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
  TURKEY
AVERY DENNISON KOREA LIMITED
  KOREA
AVERY DENNISON LANKA (PRIVATE) LIMITED
  SRI LANKA
AVERY DENNISON LUXEMBOURG SALES SARL
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L.
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON MANAGEMENT GMBH
  GERMANY
AVERY DENNISON MANAGEMENT KGAA
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON MANAGEMENT S.A.R.L.
  LUXEMBOURG
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS EUROPE B.V.
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS EUROPE GMBH
  SWITZERLAND
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS FRANCE S.A.R.L.
  FRANCE
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS GMBH
  GERMANY
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS IRELAND LIMITED
  IRELAND
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS NEDERLAND BV
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
  NEW ZEALAND
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS PTY LIMITED
  AUSTRALIA
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS ROM SRL
  ROMANIA
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS RUSSIA LLC
  RUSSIA
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS SALES FRANCE S. A. S.
  FRANCE
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS SALES GERMANY GMBH
  GERMANY
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS SDN BHD
  MALAYSIA
AVERY DENNISON MATERIALS U.K. LIMITED
  UNITED KINGDOM
AVERY DENNISON MAURITIUS LTD.
  MAURITIUS
AVERY DENNISON MOROCCO SARL
  MOROCCO
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT 0 BV
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT I BV
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT II B. V.
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT III BV
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT IX BV
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT NORTH AMERICA BV
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT VI BV
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT VII B.V.
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT VIII COOPERATIEF U.A.
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT X B V
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON NETHERLANDS INVESTMENT XI COOPERATIEF U.A.
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON NORDIC APS
  DENMARK
AVERY DENNISON NORGE A/S
  NORWAY
AVERY DENNISON NTP A. S.
  NORWAY

 


 

     
    JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY   IN WHICH ORGANIZED
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE ACCESSORIES U.K. LIMITED
  UNITED KINGDOM
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY
  U.S.A.
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS DE MEXICO, S DE R.L. DE C.V.
  MEXICO
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS FRANCE S. A. S.
  FRANCE
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS HOLDINGS COMPANY
  U.S.A.
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS ITALIA S.R.L.
  ITALY
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING U.K. LTD.
  UNITED KINGDOM
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS PTY LIMITED
  AUSTRALIA
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS (NZ) LIMITED
  NEW ZEALAND
AVERY DENNISON OFFICE PRODUCTS (PTY.) LTD.
  SOUTH AFRICA
AVERY DENNISON OVERSEAS CORPORATION
  U.S.A.
AVERY DENNISON OVERSEAS CORPORATION (JAPAN BRANCH)
  JAPAN
AVERY DENNISON PENSION TRUSTEE LIMITED
  UNITED KINGDOM
AVERY DENNISON PERU S. R. L.
  PERU
AVERY DENNISON POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
  POLAND
AVERY DENNISON PRAHA SPOL. S R. O.
  CZECH REPUBLIC
AVERY DENNISON REFLECTIVES DO BRAZIL LTDA.
  BRAZIL
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES COLOMBIA S. A.
  COLOMBIA
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES DE MEXICO, S. A. DE C.V.
  MEXICO
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, S. A.
  DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES EL SALVADOR S. A. DE C. V.
  EL SALVADOR
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES GUATEMALA, S. A.
  GUATEMALA
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
  U.S.A.
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES UK LTD.
  UNITED KINGDOM
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES (PTY) LTD
  SOUTH AFRICA
AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES HONDURAS, S. R.L.
  HONDURAS
AVERY DENNISON RFID COMPANY
  U.S.A.
AVERY DENNISON RIS KOREA LTD.
  KOREA
AVERY DENNISON RIS MALAYSIA SDN BHD.
  MALAYSIA
AVERY DENNISON RIS TAIWAN LTD.
  TAIWAN
AVERY DENNISON RIS VIETNAM CO. LTD.
  VIETNAM
AVERY DENNISON R.I.S. FRANCE S. A. S.
  FRANCE
AVERY DENNISON R.I.S. IBERIA S.L.
  SPAIN
AVERY DENNISON R.I.S. ITALIA S.R.L.
  ITALY
AVERY DENNISON R.I.S. POLSKA SP.ZO.O
  POLAND
AVERY DENNISON SCANDINAVIA AB
  SWEDEN
AVERY DENNISON SCANDINAVIA APS
  DENMARK
AVERY DENNISON SCHWEIZ AG
  SWITZERLAND
AVERY DENNISON SECURITY PRINTING EUROPE APS
  DENMARK
AVERY DENNISON SHARED SERVICES, INC.
  U.S.A.
AVERY DENNISON SINGAPORE INVESTMENTS B.V.
  NETHERLANDS
AVERY DENNISON SINGAPORE (PTE) LTD
  SINGAPORE
AVERY DENNISON SOUTH AFRICA (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
  SOUTH AFRICA
AVERY DENNISON SUOMI OY
  FINLAND
AVERY DENNISON SVERIGE AB
  SWEDEN
AVERY DENNISON SYSTEMES D’ETIQUETAGE FRANCE S.A.S.
  FRANCE
AVERY DENNISON S.R.L.
  ROMANIA
AVERY DENNISON TEKSTIL URUNLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
  TURKEY
AVERY DENNISON TAIWAN LIMITED
  TAIWAN
AVERY DENNISON U.K. II LIMITED
  UNITED KINGDOM
AVERY DENNISON U.K. LIMITED
  UNITED KINGDOM
AVERY DENNISON VERMOGENSVERWALTUNGS GMBH & CO K.G.
  GERMANY
AVERY DENNISON ZWECKFORM AUSTRIA GMBH
  AUSTRIA
AVERY DENNISON ZWECKFORM OFFICE PRODUCTS EUROPE GMBH
  GERMANY

 


 

     
    JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY   IN WHICH ORGANIZED
AVERY DENNISON ZWECKFORM OFFICE PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING GMBH
  GERMANY
AVERY DENNISON (ASIA) HOLDINGS LIMITED
  MAURITIUS
AVERY DENNISON (CHINA) COMPANY LIMITED
  CHINA
AVERY DENNISON (FUZHOU) CONVERTED PRODUCTS LIMITED
  CHINA
AVERY DENNISON (GUANGZHOU) CONVERTED PRODUCTS LIMITED
  CHINA
AVERY DENNISON (GUANGZHOU) CO. LTD.
  CHINA
AVERY DENNISON (HONG KONG) LIMITED
  HONG KONG
AVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
  INDIA
AVERY DENNISON (IRELAND) LIMITED
  IRELAND
AVERY DENNISON (KUNSHAN) CO., LIMITED
  CHINA
AVERY DENNISON (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.
  MALAYSIA
AVERY DENNISON (QINGDAO) CONVERTED PRODUCTS LIMITED
  CHINA
AVERY DENNISON (SUZHOU) CO. LIMITED
  CHINA
AVERY DENNISON (THAILAND) LTD.
  THAILAND
AVERY DENNISON (VIETNAM) LIMITED
  VIETNAM
AVERY DENNISON, S.A. DE C.V.
  MEXICO
AVERY GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, INC.
  U.S.A.
AVERY GUIDEX LIMITED
  UNITED KINGDOM
AVERY HOLDING LIMITED
  UNITED KINGDOM
AVERY HOLDING S.A.S.
  FRANCE
AVERY LLC
  U.S.A.
AVERY OFFICE PRODUCTS PUERTO RICO L.L.C.
  PUERTO RICO
AVERY PACIFIC LLC
  U.S.A.
AVERY PROPERTIES PTY. LIMITED
  AUSTRALIA
BEST COURAGE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
  BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS
BONFIRE MANAGEMENT LIMITED
  BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS
BONNIE NICE INDUSTRIES LTD.
  HONG KONG
COLLITEX S.R.L.
  ITALY
CREATERO GMBH
  GERMANY
DAH MEI LABEL LIMITED
  HONG KONG
DENNISON COMERCIO, IMPORTACAS E EXPORTACAO LTDA.
  BRAZIL
DENNISON DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES
  U.S.A.
DENNISON INTERNATIONAL COMPANY
  U.S.A.
DENNISON MANUFACTURING COMPANY
  U.S.A.
DM LABELS & RIBBONS LIMITED
  UNITED KINGDOM
DONGGUAN DAH MEI LABEL CO. LIMITED
  CHINA
EDMOND PACKAGING (GUANGZHOU) LTD.
  CHINA
EUSTON FINANCIAL LIMITED
  BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS
INDUSTRIAL DE MARCAS LTDA
  COLOMBIA
INFODRAGON MANAGEMENT LIMITED
  BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS
JAC ASIA PACIFIC SDN BHD
  MALAYSIA
JAC CARIBE C.S.Z.
  DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
JAC DO BRASIL LTDA.
  BRAZIL
JAC NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
  NEW ZEALAND
JAC (U.K.) LIMITED
  UNITED KINGDOM
JACKSTADT FRANCE S.N.C.
  FRANCE
JACKSTADT SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD.
  SOUTH AFRICA
JINTEX LIMITED
  JERSEY
KUNSHAN DAH MEI WEAVING CO. LTD
  CHINA
L&E AMERICAS SERVICIOS, S. A. DE C.V.
  MEXICO
L&E PACKAGING FAR EAST LIMITED
  HONG KONG
MARKSTAR INTERNATIONAL LTD.
  HONG KONG
MODERN MARK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
  HONG KONG

 


 

     
    JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY   IN WHICH ORGANIZED
MONARCH INDUSTRIES, INC.
  U.S.A.
MONARCH MARKING SYSTEMS HOLDINGS LTD
  UNITED KINGDOM
MONARCH MARKING (S.E.A.) PTE. LTD
  SINGAPORE
MONARCH SERVICE BUREAU LTD.
  HONG KONG
NAPERVILLE GLOBAL LIMITED
  BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS
NEW WALES FINANCE LIMITED
  BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS
NEWCLASSIC INVESTMENT LIMITED
  BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS
PAXAR BANGLADESH LTD.
  BANGLADESH
PAXAR B. V.
  NETHERLANDS
PAXAR CANADA CORPORATION
  CANADA
PAXAR CORPORATION
  U.S.A.
PAXAR CORPORATION PTY LTD.
  AUSTRALIA
PAXAR CORPORATION (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.
  MALAYSIA
PAXAR CORPORATIVO MEXICO S. A. DE C. V.
  MEXICO
PAXAR DE COLOMBIA FTZ LTDA.
  COLOMBIA
PAXAR DE EL SALVADOR S. A. DE C. V.
  EL SALVADOR
PAXAR DE GUATEMALA, S. A.
  GUATEMALA
PAXAR DE MEXICO S. A. DE C. V.
  MEXICO
PAXAR DE NICARAGUA. S.A.
  NICARAGUA
PAXAR DO BRASIL LTDA
  BRAZIL
PAXAR EUROPE (1998) LTD.
  UNITED KINGDOM
PAXAR FAR EAST LTD.
  HONG KONG
PAXAR KOREA LTD.
  KOREA
PAXAR MOROC SARL
  MOROCCO
PAXAR PACKAGING (GUANGZHOU) LTD.
  CHINA
PAXAR PAKISTAN (PVT) LTD.
  PAKISTAN
PAXAR PERU S. A. C.
  PERU
PAXAR PRINTING & PACKAGING (SHANGHAI) LTD.
  CHINA
PAXAR SISTEMAS LTDA
  BRAZIL
PAXAR SYSTEMS (GUANGZHOU) LTD.
  CHINA
PAXAR (CHINA) LTD.
  HONG KONG
PAXAR (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD.
  SINGAPORE
PAXAR (THAILAND) LIMITED
  THAILAND
PT AVERY DENNISON INDONESIA
  INDONESIA
PT AVERY DENNISON PACKAGING INDONESIA
  INDONESIA
P. T. PACIFIC LABEL INDONESIA
  INDONESIA
P. T. PAXAR INDONESIA
  INDONESIA
RAXAP ARRENDADORA, S. A. DE C. V.
  MEXICO
RAXAP SERVICIOS, S. A. DE C. V.
  MEXICO
RF IDENTICS, INC.
  U.S.A.
RINKE DIS TISCARET LTD (SIRKETI)
  TURKEY
RINKE ETIKET SERVIS SANAYI VE TICARET LTD SIRKETI
  TURKEY
RINKE FAR EAST LTD
  HONG KONG
RIPRO FAR EAST LTD
  HONG KONG
RVL AMERICAS, S DE R.L. DE C.V.
  MEXICO
RVL CENTRAL AMERICA, S. A.
  GUATEMALA
RVL PACKAGING FAR EAST LIMITED
  HONG KONG
RVL PACKAGING SINGAPORE PTE LTD.
  SINGAPORE
RVL PHILIPPINES, INC.
  PHILIPPINES
RVL PRINTED LABEL FAR EAST LIMITED
  HONG KONG
RVL SERVICE, S. DE R. L. DE C. V.
  MEXICO
SECURITY PRINTING DIVISION, INC.
  U.S.A.
SINGAPORE LACES & LABELS (PTE) LIMITED
  SINGAPORE
SKILLFIELD INVESTMENTS LIMITED
  BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS

 


 

     
    JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY   IN WHICH ORGANIZED
SU ZHOU JI ZHONG GARMENTS ACCESSORY CO. LIMITED
  CHINA
SUZHOU FENG YI HENG YE DYE CO., LTD.
  CHINA
TESSITURA ITALIAN ETICHETTE S.R.L.
  ITALY
TIADECO PARTICIPACOES, LTDA.
  BRAZIL
TIGER EIGHT GROUP LIMITED
  BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS
UNIVERSAL PACKAGING & DESIGN, LTD.
  HONG KONG
WORLDWIDE RISK INSURANCE, INC.
  U.S.A.

 

exv24
Exhibit 24
Power of Attorney
WHEREAS, Avery Dennison Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned is a director of the Company;
NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Daniel R. O’Bryant, Mitchell R. Butier and Susan C. Miller, and each of them, as attorneys-in-fact for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, and in the capacity of the undersigned as a director of the Company, to execute the above referenced Form 10-K and any amendments or supplements thereto, hereby giving and granting to said attorneys-in-fact, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing required and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each attorney-in-fact may or shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney effective February 26, 2010.
         
Signature   Title   Date
/s/ Dean A. Scarborough
 
Dean A. Scarborough
  President and Chief Executive Officer, Director   February 26, 2010

 


 

         
Signature   Title   Date
/s/ Peter K. Barker
 
Peter K. Barker
  Director   February 26, 2010
/s/ Rolf Börjesson
 
Rolf Börjesson
  Director   February 26, 2010
/s/ John T. Cardis
 
John T. Cardis
  Director   February 26, 2010
/s/ Richard M. Ferry
 
Richard M. Ferry
  Director   February 26, 2010
/s/ Ken C. Hicks
 
Ken C. Hicks
  Director   February 26, 2010
/s/ Kent Kresa
 
Kent Kresa
  Chairman,
Director
  February 26, 2010
/s/ Peter W. Mullin
 
Peter W. Mullin
  Director   February 26, 2010
/s/ David E. I. Pyott
 
David E. I. Pyott
  Director   February 26, 2010
/s/ Debra L. Reed
 
Debra L. Reed
  Director   February 26, 2010
/s/ Patrick T. Siewert
 
Patrick T. Siewert
  Director   February 26, 2010
/s/ Julia A. Stewart
 
Julia A. Stewart
  Director   February 26, 2010

 

exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION
I, Dean A. Scarborough, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Avery Dennison Corporation;
 
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b)   designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
  c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  d)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
  a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     
 
  /s/ Dean A. Scarborough
 
   
 
  Dean A. Scarborough
 
  President and Chief Executive Officer
February 26, 2010

exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION
I, Daniel R. O’Bryant, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Avery Dennison Corporation;
 
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b)   designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
  c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  d)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
  a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     
 
   
 
  /s/ Daniel R. O’Bryant
 
   
 
  Daniel R. O’Bryant
 
  Executive Vice President, Finance, and
Chief Financial Officer
February 26, 2010

exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER*
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Avery Dennison Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:
  (i)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
  (ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 26, 2010
     
 
  /s/ Dean A. Scarborough
 
   
 
  Dean A. Scarborough
 
  President and Chief Executive Officer
*   The above certification accompanies the issuer’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and is furnished, not filed, as provided in SEC Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003.
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER*
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Avery Dennison Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:
  (i)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
  (ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 26, 2010
     
 
   
 
  /s/ Daniel R. O’Bryant
 
   
 
  Daniel R. O’Bryant
 
  Executive Vice President, Finance, and
Chief Financial Officer
*   The above certification accompanies the issuer’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and is furnished, not filed, as provided in SEC Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003.